Performance analysis of partially recuperative gas turbine combined cycle under off-design conditions

被引:33
作者
Liu, Taohong [1 ]
Zhang, Guoqiang [1 ]
Li, Yongyi [1 ]
Yang, Yongping [1 ]
机构
[1] North China Elect Power Univ, Beijing Key Lab Emiss Surveillance & Control Ther, Natl Thermal Power Engn & Technol Res Ctr, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
关键词
Partially recuperative; Recuperation adjustment; Combined cycle; Off-design performance; THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS; FUEL RECUPERATOR; HEAT-RECOVERY; POWER; PLANT; EFFICIENCY; REHEAT; AIR;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2018.01.075
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
A partially recuperative gas turbine combined cycle (GTCC(Pr)) is proposed in this paper to improve the off-design performance of power plants. The performance coupling with a new operation strategy is also analyzed. In the proposed GTCC(Pr), the gas flow at the outlet of the turbine is divided into two streams, and only a part of exhaust gas from the turbine is used to preheat the outlet air of the compressor. Exhaust gas streams from the recuperator are mixed with flue from the second reheater at the inlet of the first reheater to achieve similar temperature level. Specifically, the fraction of exhaust gas that preheats air can be changed to adjust the load of the combined cycle. The PG9351FA gas turbine unit is selected as the reference unit for comparison. Then, the design/off-design characteristics of the two cycles are compared and analyzed with the same turbine initial temperature. Results indicate that the partially recuperative GTCC(Pr) running with the new operation has better off-design performances than the reference unit with approximately 1.7% maximum difference of efficiency. At the design point, the exhaust gas used for partial recuperation only accounts for 10% of the total mass, and the effect of recuperation is not evident. Therefore, the two cycles possess nearly similar output and efficiency. The efficiency of partially recuperative GTCC(Pr) is nearly unchanged with the increasing recuperative mass fraction, which changes its specific power to adjust the load. At low loads, with decreasing turbine exhaust gas temperature, the efficiency improvement also decreases due to the partial recuperation. A comprehensive comparison with the reference unit revealed that GTCC(Pr) with the proposed "recuperation adjustment" method can maintain a higher off-design efficiency and slightly lower design power output compared with the conventional cycle. Specific power adjustment of recuperation is one of the efficient methods for load adjustment, and GTCC(Pr) is one of the best options.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 65
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, THESIS ZHEJIANG U ZH
[2]   Enhancing the efficiency and power of the triple-pressure reheat combined cycle by means of gas reheat, gas recuperation, and reduction of the irreversibility in the heat recovery steam generator [J].
Bassily, A. M. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2008, 85 (12) :1141-1162
[3]  
Bhargava R, 2002, J ENG GAS TURBINES P, V124
[4]   Optimum design and thermodynamic analysis of a gas turbine and ORC combined cycle with recuperators [J].
Cao, Yue ;
Gao, Yike ;
Zheng, Ya ;
Dai, Yiping .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 116 :32-41
[5]   Studying the effects of combining internal and external heat recovery on techno-economic performances of gas-steam power plants [J].
Carapellucci, Roberto ;
Giordano, Lorena .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 107 :34-42
[6]  
Celis C, 2008, P ASME TURB EXP
[7]  
Cordova JL, 2015, ASME TURB EXP 2015 T
[8]   Gas turbine performance at varying ambient temperature [J].
De Sa, Ashley ;
Al Zubaidy, Sarim .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 31 (14-15) :2735-2739
[9]   Thermoeconomic evaluation of the feasibility of highly efficient combined cycle power plants [J].
Franco, A ;
Casarosa, C .
ENERGY, 2004, 29 (12-15) :1963-1982
[10]  
Ganapathy V., 1990, SIMPLIFY HEAT RECOVE