Industry 4.0 technologies in the manufacturing sector: Are we sure they are all relevant for environmental performance?

被引:130
作者
Chiarini, Andrea [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Verona, Dept Business Adm, Via Cantarane 24, I-37129 Verona, Italy
关键词
cybertechnology; environmental performance; Industry; 4; 0; smart technology;
D O I
10.1002/bse.2797
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This research contributes to the debate about the relevance of Industry 4.0 technologies in improving environmental performance in the manufacturing industry. We employed a qualitative-quantitative approach in which 19 Italian operations managers were interviewed and 260 managers responded to an online questionnaire. The effects of various technologies were ranked using ordinal regression. Comments and suggestions gave context to the quantitative results. Sensors, radio-frequency identification, artificial intelligence and analytics were found to be most relevant in improving environmental performance, whereas simulation software contributed moderately. Additive manufacturing, cobots, robots, automated mobile robots and automated guided vehicles had a negative effect, augmented reality had no effect and other technologies indirectly affected environmental performance. We also found a lack of knowledge and application as well as scepticism about technologies such as artificial intelligence and augmented reality. Finally, there was concern about the disposal of electrical and electronic waste produced by these technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:3194 / 3207
页数:14
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
Accredia-The Italian Accreditation Body, 2020, DATABANKS CERTIFICAT
[2]   A methodological framework for the inclusion of modern additive manufacturing into the production portfolio of a focused factory [J].
Achillas, Ch. ;
Aidonis, D. ;
Iakovou, E. ;
Thymianidis, M. ;
Tzetzis, D. .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2015, 37 :328-339
[3]  
Agresti A., 2002, CATEGORICAL DATA ANA, V2nd Edn, P320, DOI [DOI 10.1002/0471249688, DOI 10.1002/SMJ.331]
[4]   Impact mitigation or ecological restoration? Examining the environmental sustainability practices of multinational mining companies [J].
Amoah, Prince ;
Eweje, Gabriel .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 30 (01) :551-565
[5]  
Antonius R., 2003, Interpreting quantitative data with SPSS, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781849209328
[6]   The impact of ISO 14001 on firm environmental and economic performance: The moderating role of size and environmental awareness [J].
Arocena, Pablo ;
Orcos, Raquel ;
Zouaghi, Fedaous .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 30 (02) :955-967
[7]   Fog of Everything: Energy-Efficient Networked Computing Architectures, Research Challenges, and a Case Study [J].
Baccarelli, Enzo ;
Naranjo, Paola G. Vinueza ;
Scarpiniti, Michele ;
Shojafar, Mohammad ;
Abawajy, Jemal H. .
IEEE ACCESS, 2017, 5 :9882-9910
[8]   Role of institutional pressures and resources in the adoption of big data analytics powered artificial intelligence, sustainable manufacturing practices and circular economy capabilities [J].
Bag, Surajit ;
Pretorius, Jan Ham Christiaan ;
Gupta, Shivam ;
Dwivedi, Yogesh K. .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 163
[9]   Industry 4.0 and supply chain sustainability: framework and future research directions [J].
Bag, Surajit ;
Telukdarie, Arnesh ;
Pretorius, J. H. C. ;
Gupta, Shivam .
BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2021, 28 (05) :1410-1450
[10]  
BIOD A, 1994, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V3, P31, DOI DOI 10.1002/BSE.3280030104