Comparison of Different Electrical Resistivity Measurement Methods of Soft Marine Clays

被引:0
作者
Duan, Wei [1 ]
Cai, Guojun [1 ]
Liu, Songyu [1 ]
Li, Kuikui [1 ]
Puppala, Anand J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Inst Geotech Engn, Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Texas Arlington, Dept Civil Engn, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF GEOSHANGHAI 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE: MULTI-PHYSICS PROCESSES IN SOIL MECHANICS AND ADVANCES IN GEOTECHNICAL TESTING | 2018年
关键词
Electrical resistivity; Piezocone penetration test; Site characterization; Soft marine clay;
D O I
10.1007/978-981-13-0095-0_53
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The electrical resistivity of soil is one of the comprehensive indexes of the inherent property of soil, which has important theoretical signification and application value. The measured methods of soil electrical resistivity mainly can be divided into two groups: laboratory tests and in-situ tests. The in situ testing has been widely used in geotechnical site characterization due to its high accuracy and repeatability. Especially the emergence and development of resistivity piezocone penetration test (RCPTU), the RCPTU becomes the main tool of in situ measurement of the electrical resistivity of soil due to its not only include a conventional piezocone penetration test, but also provides a continuous profile of electrical resistivity. The objective of this paper was to compare the different methods for measuring the electrical resistivity of soil. First, the principle of the electrical resistivity of soil was briefly presented. Then, the comparison of different electrical resistivity measurement methods of soft marine clays was made based on the Ningbo marine clay and the advantages and disadvantages of various measured methods were also analyzed and summarized. The results of comparative analysis was verified the reliability of soil electrical resistivity measured by RCPTU.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 485
页数:9
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics [J].
Archie, GE .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF MINING AND METALLURGICAL ENGINEERS, 1942, 146 :54-61
[2]  
ARULANANDAN K, 1988, J GEOTECH ENG-ASCE, V114, P753, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1988)114:7(753)
[3]   DIELECTRIC METHOD FOR PREDICTION OF POROSITY OF SATURATED SOIL [J].
ARULANANDAN, K .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1991, 117 (02) :319-330
[4]  
ASTM D, 2000, D5778 ASTM
[5]   The micro-structures of clay given by resistivity measurements [J].
Fukue, M ;
Minato, T ;
Horibe, H ;
Taya, N .
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 1999, 54 (1-2) :43-53
[6]   Void Ratio Estimation of Soft Soils Using Electrical Resistivity Cone Probe [J].
Kim, Joon Han ;
Yoon, Hyung-Koo ;
Lee, Jong-Sub .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 137 (01) :86-93
[7]  
Long M, 2012, CAN GEOTECH J, V49, P1158, DOI [10.1139/T2012-080, 10.1139/t2012-080]
[8]  
Lunne T., 1997, CONE PENETRATION TES, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11204-010-9072-X
[9]   Experience from Two Resistivity Inversion Techniques Applied in Three Cases of Geotechnical Site Investigation [J].
Wisen, Roger ;
Christiansen, Anders V. ;
Dahlin, Torleif ;
Auken, Esben .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 134 (12) :1730-1742
[10]  
Zhou M, 2011, ROCK SOIL MECH, V32, P3269