An Intersectional Approach to Research on Unemployment

被引:3
作者
Haskova, Hana [1 ]
Krizkova, Alena [1 ]
Pospisilova, Kristyna [1 ]
机构
[1] Sociol Ustav AV CR, Vvi, Jilska 1, Prague 11000 1, Czech Republic
来源
SOCIOLOGICKY CASOPIS-CZECH SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW | 2018年 / 54卷 / 02期
关键词
intersectionality; unemployment; inequalities; gender; logistic regression; interactions; LABOR-MARKET; GENDER; COMPLEXITY; EMPLOYMENT; RACE;
D O I
10.13060/00380288.2018.54.2.398
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
This article critically evaluates the use of an intergroup intersectional perspective in quantitative research on social inequalities and thereby helps to obtain deeper knowledge of the sources of inequality that impact chances of unemployment in the Czech Republic and contribute to the discussion of the benefits and limitations of using this approach. The advantage offered by the intersectional perspective is illustrated in an analysis of EU-SILC data. The analysis combines an additive and multiplicative (intersectional) approach to research on unemployment in the Czech Republic. An additive model of binary logistic regression is accompanied by binary logistic regression models with interactions. The aim is to identify the factors and the social positions that result from the interaction of these factors that together influence chances of unemployment. The analysis shows that one source of inequality in interaction with other sources can have an entirely different impact on chances of unemployment than individual factors have on their own. An example is the interaction of gender and parenthood, which creates different social positions for different subpopulations. Motherhood, fatherhood, and the absence of the need to care for a young child can generate specific (dis)advantages for women or men also depending on the nature of their employment.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 197
页数:27
相关论文
共 60 条
[31]   ECONOMIC RECESSION AND MENTAL-HEALTH - SOME CONCEPTUAL ISSUES [J].
JAHODA, M .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 1988, 44 (04) :13-23
[32]  
Jahoda R, 2011, STUDIE DISTRIBUCNICH
[33]  
Katrnák T, 2007, SOCIOL CAS, V43, P281
[34]  
Kolarova M, 2008, GENDER ROVNE PRILEZI, V9, P1
[35]  
KOTIKOVA J, 2003, TRH PRACE NEZAMESTNA, P128
[36]  
Kováts E, 2017, GENDER POLIT, P175, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-43533-6_12
[37]  
KRIZKOVA A., 2014, GENDER ROVNE PRILEZI, V15, P61, DOI DOI 10.13060/12130028.2014.15.2.131
[38]  
Lehmann S, 2015, CZECH REPUBLIC WORKI
[39]   Institutionalizing Intersectionality in the European Union? POLICY DEVELOPMENTS AND CONTESTATIONS [J].
Lombardo, Emanuela ;
Verloo, Mieke .
INTERNATIONAL FEMINIST JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2009, 11 (04) :478-495
[40]   Intersectionality: are we taking enough notice in the field of work and employment relations? [J].
McBride, Anne ;
Hebson, Gail ;
Holgate, Jane .
WORK EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIETY, 2015, 29 (02) :331-341