Measurement Bias in Multilevel Data

被引:64
作者
Jak, Suzanne [1 ]
Oort, Frans J. [1 ]
Dolan, Conor V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, NL-1018 VZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
cluster bias; measurement invariance; multilevel structural equation modeling; COVARIANCE STRUCTURE-ANALYSIS; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE; MODELS;
D O I
10.1080/10705511.2014.856694
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Measurement bias can be detected using structural equation modeling (SEM), by testing measurement invariance with multigroup factor analysis (Joreskog, 1971;Meredith, 1993;Sorbom, 1974) MIMIC modeling (Muthen, 1989) or restricted factor analysis (Oort, 1992,1998). In educational research, data often have a nested, multilevel structure, for example when data are collected from children in classrooms. Multilevel structures might complicate measurement bias research. In 2-level data, the potentially biasing trait or violator can be a Level 1 variable (e.g., pupil sex), or a Level 2 variable (e.g., teacher sex). One can also test measurement invariance with respect to the clustering variable (e.g., classroom). This article provides a stepwise approach for the detection of measurement bias with respect to these 3 types of violators. This approach works from Level 1 upward, so the final model accounts for all bias and substantive findings at both levels. The 5 proposed steps are illustrated with data of teacher-child relationships.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 39
页数:9
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Int J Educ Res, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0883-0355, DOI 10.1016/0883-0355(89)90002-5]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Methodology, DOI [10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86, DOI 10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86, 10.1027/1614-1881.1.3.86, DOI 10.1027/1614-1881.1.3.86]
[3]   Bayesian factor analysis for multilevel binary observations [J].
Ansari, A ;
Jedidi, K .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2000, 65 (04) :475-496
[4]   Using restricted factor analysis with latent moderated structures to detect uniform and nonuniform measurement bias; a simulation study [J].
Barendse, M. T. ;
Oort, F. J. ;
Garst, G. J. A. .
ASTA-ADVANCES IN STATISTICAL ANALYSIS, 2010, 94 (02) :117-127
[5]  
Barendse M. T., 2011, MEASUREMENT BI UNPUB
[6]  
BENTLER PM, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P238, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
[7]  
Browne M.W., 1993, SOCIOL METHOD RES, P445
[8]  
Bryk A. S., 1992, HIERARCHICAL LINEAR
[9]   Two failures of Spearman's hypothesis: The GATB in Holland and the JAT in South Africa [J].
Dolan, CV ;
Roorda, W ;
Wicherts, JM .
INTELLIGENCE, 2004, 32 (02) :155-173
[10]   An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data [J].
Flora, DB ;
Curran, PJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2004, 9 (04) :466-491