Measurement Invariance: Testing for It and Explaining Why It is Absent

被引:23
作者
Meitinger, Katharina [1 ]
Davidov, Eldad [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Schmidt, Peter [5 ]
Braun, Michael [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Fac Social & Behav Sci, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Cologne, Fac Management Econ & Social Sci, Cologne, Germany
[3] Univ Zurich, URPP Social Networks, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Univ Zurich, Dept Sociol, Zurich, Switzerland
[5] Univ Giessen, Ctr Int Dev & Environm Res ZEU, Giessen, Germany
[6] GESIS Leibniz Inst Social Sci, Mannheim, Germany
来源
SURVEY RESEARCH METHODS | 2020年 / 14卷 / 04期
关键词
measurement equivalence; comparability; bias; approximate measurement invariance; alignment; BSEM; MEASUREMENT EQUIVALENCE; BIAS;
D O I
10.18148/srm/2020.v14i4.7655
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
There has been a significant increase in cross-national and longitudinal data production in social science research in recent decades. Before drawing substantive conclusions based on cross-national and longitudinal survey data, researchers need to assess whether the constructs are measured in the same way across countries and time-points. If cross-national data are not tested for comparability, researchers risk confusing methodological artefacts as "real" substantive differences across countries. However, researchers often find it particularly difficult to establish the highest level of measurement invariance, that is, exact scalar invariance. When measurement invariance is rejected, it is crucial to understand why this was the case and to address its absence with approaches, such as alignment optimization or Bayesian structural equation modelling.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 349
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] TESTING DESTINATION IMAGE SCALE INVARIANCE FOR INTERGROUP COMPARISON
    Ceylan, Demet
    Cizel, Beykan
    Karakas, Hatice
    TOURISM ANALYSIS, 2020, 25 (2-3): : 239 - 251
  • [42] Testing Measurement Invariance in Physical Education and Exercise Science: A Tutorial Using the Well-Being Self-Efficacy Scale
    Pacewicz, Christine E.
    Hill, Christopher R.
    Lee, Seungmin
    Myers, Nicholas D.
    Prilleltensky, Isaac
    McMahon, Adam
    Pfeiffer, Karin A.
    Brincks, Ahnalee M.
    MEASUREMENT IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND EXERCISE SCIENCE, 2022, 26 (02) : 165 - 177
  • [43] Migrant Health Inequalities or Unequal Measurements? Testing for Cross-cultural and Longitudinal Measurement Invariance of Subjective Physical and Mental Health
    Holz, Manuel
    Mayerl, Jochen
    METHODS DATA ANALYSES, 2024, 18 (01): : 59 - 78
  • [44] The Child Behavior Checklist and Youth Self-Report in adolescents with epilepsy: Testing measurement invariance of the Attention and Thought Problems subscales
    Ferro, Mark A.
    Boyle, Michael H.
    Scott, James G.
    Dingle, Kaeleen
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2014, 31 : 34 - 42
  • [45] Measurement invariance testing for the United States identity scale (USIS) across non-hispanic black and white college students
    Rodil, Julia C.
    Meca, Alan
    Allison, Kelsie K.
    Martinez-Fuentes, Stefanie
    Cowan, Isis
    Gonzales-Backen, Melinda A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERCULTURAL RELATIONS, 2022, 86 : 134 - 144
  • [46] Measurement Invariance Across Groups in Latent Growth Modeling
    Kim, Eun Sook
    Willson, Victor L.
    STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2014, 21 (03) : 408 - 424
  • [47] Measurement invariance of organizational citizenship behavior across gender
    Jang, Seulki
    Allen, Tammy D.
    Kim, Eunsook
    O'Brien, Kimberly E.
    Cho, Inchul
    Ceylan, Savas
    APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW-PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE, 2022, 71 (04): : 1535 - 1564
  • [48] Measurement Invariance of Neuropsychological Tests in Diverse Older Persons
    Mungas, Dan
    Widaman, Keith F.
    Reed, Bruce R.
    Farias, Sarah Tomaszewski
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 25 (02) : 260 - 269
  • [49] Cross-Cultural Commonalities in Religiosity by Measurement Invariance
    Watanabe, Mitsuharu
    Kawabata, Akira
    Yumiyama, Tatsuya
    JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF RELIGION, 2022, 61 (3-4) : 690 - 709
  • [50] Why do People Disagree? Explaining and Endorsing the Possibility of Partiality in Judgments
    Mills, Candice M.
    Al-Jabari, Rawya M.
    Archacki, Melinda A.
    JOURNAL OF COGNITION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 13 (01) : 111 - 136