Combination Assessment of Clinical Complete Response of Patients With Rectal Cancer Following Chemoradiotherapy With Endoscopy and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

被引:16
|
作者
Ko, Hye Mi [1 ]
Choi, Yo Han [2 ]
Lee, Jeong Eun [3 ]
Ha Lee, Kyung [1 ]
Kim, Ji Yeon [1 ]
Kim, Jin Soo [1 ]
机构
[1] Chungnam Natl Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, 282 Munhwa Ro, Daejeon 35015, South Korea
[2] Chungcheongnam Do Seusan Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Seosan, South Korea
[3] Chungnam Natl Univ, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, Daejeon, South Korea
关键词
Rectal neoplasms; Chemoradiotherapy; Complete response; Endoscopy; Magnetic resonance imaging; PATHOLOGICAL COMPLETE RESPONSE; NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIATION; PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIATION; NONOPERATIVE TREATMENT; LOCAL RECURRENCE; STATISTICS NOTES; TUMOR RESPONSE; THERAPY; SURVIVAL; WAIT;
D O I
10.3393/ac.2018.10.15
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: The response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer can be assessed using digital rectal examination, endoscopy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Precise assessment of clinical complete response (CR) after CRT is essential when deciding between optimizing surgery or organ-preserving treatment. The objectives of this study were to correlate the CR finding in endoscopy and MRI with pathologic CR and to determine the appropriate approach for combining endoscopy and MRI to predict the pathologic CR in patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant CRT. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 102 patients with rectal cancer who underwent endoscopy and MRI at 2-4 weeks after CRT. We assigned a confidence level (1-4) for the endoscopic and MRI assessments. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were analyzed based on the endoscopy, MRI, and combination method findings. Diagnostic modalities were compared using the likelihood ratios. Results: Of 102 patients, 17 (16.7%) had a CR. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for the prediction CR of endoscopy with biopsy were 85.3%, 52.9%, and 91.8%, while those of MRI were 91.2%, 70.6%, and 95.3%, and those of combined endoscopy and MRI were 89.2%, 52.9%, and 96.5%, respectively. No significant differences were noted in the sensitivity and specificity of any each modality. The prediction rate for CR of the combination method was 92.6% after the posttest probability test. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that combining the interpretation of endoscopy with biopsy and MRI could provide a good prediction rate for CR in patients with rectal cancer after CRT.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 208
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] "Watch and Wait" for complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer
    Peacock, Oliver
    Chang, George J.
    MINERVA CHIRURGICA, 2019, 74 (06) : 481 - 495
  • [22] Improvement in the Assessment of Response to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and a Multigene Biomarker
    Cho, Eunhae
    Jung, Sung Woo
    Park, In Ja
    Jang, Jong Keon
    Park, Seong Ho
    Hong, Seung-Mo
    Lee, Jong Lyul
    Kim, Chan Wook
    Yoon, Yong Sik
    Lim, Seok-Byung
    Yu, Chang Sik
    Kim, Jin Cheon
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (14)
  • [23] Predictors of pathological complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer
    Mehraj, Asif
    Baba, Arshad A.
    Khan, Bushra
    Khan, Mudassir Ahmad
    Wani, Rauf A.
    Parray, Fazl Q.
    Chowdri, Nisar A.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 18 (09) : S391 - S396
  • [24] Magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of rectal cancer nodes after chemoradiotherapy: A single center experience
    Barbaro, Brunella
    Carafa, Maria Rachele PIa
    Minordi, Laura Maria
    Testa, Priscilla
    Tatulli, Giulia
    Carano, Davide
    Fiorillo, Claudio
    Chiloiro, Giuditta
    Romano, Angela
    Valentini, Vincenzo
    Gambacorta, Maria Antonietta
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 193
  • [25] A multiple-time-scale comparative study for the added value of magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomics in predicting pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer
    Peng, Wenjing
    Wan, Lijuan
    Wang, Sicong
    Zou, Shuangmei
    Zhao, Xinming
    Zhang, Hongmei
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [26] A Case with Rectal Cancer Relapses After Clinical Complete Remission Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
    Zhang, Ping-Bao
    Huang, Zi-Li
    Li, Jia-Bei
    Huang, Xiu-Yan
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2019, 11 : 10801 - 10806
  • [27] How to Combine Diffusion-Weighted and T2-Weighted Imaging for MRI Assessment of Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Rectal Cancer?
    Jang, Jong Keon
    Lee, Chul-min
    Park, Seong Ho
    Kim, Jong Hoon
    Kim, Jihun
    Lim, Seok-Byung
    Yu, Chang Sik
    Kim, Jin Cheon
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 22 (09) : 1451 - 1461
  • [28] Interpretation of Complete Tumor Response on MRI Following Chemoradiotherapy of Rectal Cancer: Inter-Reader Agreement and Associated Factors in Multi-Center Clinical Practice
    Kim, Hae Young
    Cho, Seung Hyun
    Jang, Jong Keon
    Kim, Bohyun
    Lee, Chul-min
    Lim, Joon Seok
    Moon, Sung Kyoung
    Oh, Soon Nam
    Seo, Nieun
    Park, Seong Ho
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 25 (04) : 351 - 362
  • [29] Clinical prediction model of pathological response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer
    Shin, Jung Kyong
    Huh, Jung Wook
    Lee, Woo Yong
    Yun, Seong Hyeon
    Kim, Hee Cheol
    Cho, Yong Beom
    Park, Yoon Ah
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [30] Carcinoembryonic Antigen Improves the Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Prediction of Pathologic Response after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Patients with Rectal Cancer
    Yoo, Gyu Sang
    Park, Hee Chul
    Yu, Jeong Il
    Choi, Doo Ho
    Cho, Won Kyung
    Park, Young Suk
    Park, Joon Oh
    Lim, Ho Yeong
    Kang, Won Ki
    Lee, Woo Yong
    Kim, Hee Cheol
    Yun, Seong Hyeon
    Cho, Yong Beom
    Park, Yoon Ah
    Song, Kyoung Doo
    Kim, Seok-Hyung
    Ha, Sang Yun
    CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2020, 52 (02): : 446 - 454