Combination Assessment of Clinical Complete Response of Patients With Rectal Cancer Following Chemoradiotherapy With Endoscopy and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

被引:16
|
作者
Ko, Hye Mi [1 ]
Choi, Yo Han [2 ]
Lee, Jeong Eun [3 ]
Ha Lee, Kyung [1 ]
Kim, Ji Yeon [1 ]
Kim, Jin Soo [1 ]
机构
[1] Chungnam Natl Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, 282 Munhwa Ro, Daejeon 35015, South Korea
[2] Chungcheongnam Do Seusan Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Seosan, South Korea
[3] Chungnam Natl Univ, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, Daejeon, South Korea
关键词
Rectal neoplasms; Chemoradiotherapy; Complete response; Endoscopy; Magnetic resonance imaging; PATHOLOGICAL COMPLETE RESPONSE; NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIATION; PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIATION; NONOPERATIVE TREATMENT; LOCAL RECURRENCE; STATISTICS NOTES; TUMOR RESPONSE; THERAPY; SURVIVAL; WAIT;
D O I
10.3393/ac.2018.10.15
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: The response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer can be assessed using digital rectal examination, endoscopy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Precise assessment of clinical complete response (CR) after CRT is essential when deciding between optimizing surgery or organ-preserving treatment. The objectives of this study were to correlate the CR finding in endoscopy and MRI with pathologic CR and to determine the appropriate approach for combining endoscopy and MRI to predict the pathologic CR in patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant CRT. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 102 patients with rectal cancer who underwent endoscopy and MRI at 2-4 weeks after CRT. We assigned a confidence level (1-4) for the endoscopic and MRI assessments. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were analyzed based on the endoscopy, MRI, and combination method findings. Diagnostic modalities were compared using the likelihood ratios. Results: Of 102 patients, 17 (16.7%) had a CR. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for the prediction CR of endoscopy with biopsy were 85.3%, 52.9%, and 91.8%, while those of MRI were 91.2%, 70.6%, and 95.3%, and those of combined endoscopy and MRI were 89.2%, 52.9%, and 96.5%, respectively. No significant differences were noted in the sensitivity and specificity of any each modality. The prediction rate for CR of the combination method was 92.6% after the posttest probability test. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that combining the interpretation of endoscopy with biopsy and MRI could provide a good prediction rate for CR in patients with rectal cancer after CRT.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 208
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Endoscopy and magnetic resonance imaging-based prediction of ypT stage in patients with rectal cancer who received chemoradiotherapy Results from a prospective study of 110 patients
    Cho, Min Soo
    Kim, HonSoul
    Han, Yoon Dae
    Hur, Hyuk
    Min, Byung Soh
    Baik, Seung Hyuk
    Cheon, Jae Hee
    Lim, Joon Seok
    Lee, Kang Young
    Kim, Nam Kyu
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (35) : e16614
  • [2] The Value of Endoscopy as a Predictive Factor when Evaluating the Clinical Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Patients with Rectal Cancer
    Bengulescu, Iustinian
    Radu, Petru
    Iorga, Cristian
    Bratucu, Mircea
    Pasnicu, Costin
    Garofil, Dragos
    Popa, Florian
    Strambu, Victor
    CHIRURGIA, 2020, 115 (03) : 373 - 379
  • [3] Assessment and management of the complete clinical response of rectal cancer to chemoradiotherapy
    Habr-Gama, A.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2006, 8 : 21 - 24
  • [4] Predictors of complete response and Disease recurrence Following chemoradiation for rectal cancer
    Bitterman, Danielle S.
    Salgado, Lucas Resende
    Moore, Harvey G.
    Sanfilippo, Nicholas J.
    Gu, Ping
    Hatzaras, Ioannis
    Du, Kevin L.
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2015, 5
  • [5] Clinical parameters predicting pathologic complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer
    Zeng, Wei-Gen
    Liang, Jian-Wei
    Wang, Zheng
    Zhang, Xing-Mao
    Hu, Jun-Jie
    Hou, Hui-Rong
    Zhou, Hai-Tao
    Zhou, Zhi-Xiang
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 34
  • [6] Response assessment after (chemo)radiotherapy for rectal cancer: Why are we missing complete responses with MRI and endoscopy?
    van der Sande, Marit E.
    Beets, Geerard L.
    Hupkens, Britt J. P.
    Breukink, Stephanie O.
    Melenhorst, Jamb
    Bakers, Frans C. H.
    Lambregts, Doenja M. J.
    Grabsch, Heike I.
    Beets-Tan, Regina G. H.
    Maas, Monique
    EJSO, 2019, 45 (06): : 1011 - 1017
  • [7] Assessment of Clinical Complete Response After Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer with Digital Rectal Examination, Endoscopy, and MRI
    Weiser, Martin R.
    Gollub, Marc J.
    Saltz, Leonard B.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 (12) : 3769 - 3771
  • [8] Clinical Prediction of Pathological Complete Response After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer
    Huh, Jung Wook
    Kim, Hyeong Rok
    Kim, Young Jin
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2013, 56 (06) : 698 - 703
  • [9] Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging assessment of whole tumour heterogeneity for chemoradiotherapy response prediction in rectal cancer
    Pham, Trang Thanh
    Liney, Gary
    Wong, Karen
    Henderson, Christopher
    Rai, Robba
    Graham, Petra L.
    Borok, Nira
    Truong, Minh Xuan
    Lee, Mark
    Shin, Joo-Shik
    Hudson, Malcolm
    Barton, Michael B.
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 18 : 26 - 33
  • [10] Predictors of Pathologic Complete Response Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer
    Al-Sukhni, Eisar
    Attwood, Kristopher
    Mattson, David M.
    Gabriel, Emmanuel
    Nurkin, Steven J.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (04) : 1177 - 1186