Efficacy of Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix to Augment Peri-implant Soft Tissue Thickness Compared with Autogenous Connective Tissue Graf: A Systems is Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:43
作者
Gargallo-Albiol, Jordi [1 ,2 ]
Barootchi, Shayan [2 ]
Tavelli, Lorenzo [2 ]
Wang, Hom-Lay [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Int Catalunya, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Dent, Dept Periodont & Oral Med, 1011 North Univ Ave, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
collagen matrix; connective tissue; dental implants; keratinized tissue; meta-analysis; soft tissue management; CORONALLY ADVANCED FLAPS; FREE GINGIVAL GRAFT; KERATINIZED MUCOSA; DENTAL IMPLANTS; ROOT COVERAGE; VOLUME AUGMENTATION; RECESSION; HEALTH; OUTCOMES; PATIENT;
D O I
10.11607/jomi.7497
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Several approaches for increasing peri-implant mucosal thickness have been proposed, including autogenous, allogeneic, and xenogeneic grafts. The objective of this meta-analysis was to analyze whether xenogeneic matrices are viable alternatives to autogenous soft tissue grafts in peri-implant soft tissue augmentation. Materials and Methods: A systematic search was performed to select randomized clinical trials that compared connective tissue grafts and xenogeneic collagen matrices. The primary outcomes were the mucosal thickness and keratinized mucosa changes, while the secondary outcomes were patient morbidity, painkiller consumption, and surgical time required for the procedure. Results: Seven randomized clinical trials were included for the final evaluation with a total number of 218 implant sites (108 in the connective tissue graft group, 110 in the collagen matrix group) with 3 to 12 months (mean: 6 months) followup period. Results showed mucosal thickness increase in both buccal and crestal sites, but it did not yield statistical significance. The keratinized mucosa gain difference was only -0.06 mm (95% CI [-30.0, 0.18]) between the treatments. The postsurgical discomfort, increased consumption of painkillers, and reduction of treatment time (15.46 minutes less) differed significantly in favor of the collagen matrix group. Conclusion: Within the limits of this study, it can be concluded that collagen matrix and connective tissue graft are equivalent in peri-implant soft tissue augmentation.
引用
收藏
页码:1053 / 1064
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy of Xenogeneic Collagen Matrices in Augmenting Peri-Implant Soft Tissue: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Dadlani, Shashi
    Joseph, Betsy
    Anil, Sukumaran
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DENTAL RESEARCH, 2024, 10 (04):
  • [2] Collagen Matrix vs. Autogenous Connective Tissue Graft for Soft Tissue Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Vallecillo, Cristina
    Toledano-Osorio, Manuel
    Vallecillo-Rivas, Marta
    Toledano, Manuel
    Rodriguez-Archilla, Alberto
    Osorio, Raquel
    POLYMERS, 2021, 13 (11)
  • [3] Autogenous graft versus collagen matrices for peri-implant soft tissue augmentation. A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Tommasato, Grazia
    Del Fabbro, Massimo
    Oliva, Nadim
    Khijmatgar, Shahnawaz
    Grusovin, Maria Gabriella
    Sculean, Anton
    Canullo, Luigi
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2024, 28 (05)
  • [4] Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on peri-implant health or disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    Naenni, Nadja
    Figuero, Elena
    Hammerle, Christoph H. F.
    Schwarz, Frank
    Jung, Ronald E.
    Sanz-Sanchez, Ignacio
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2018, 29 : 32 - 49
  • [5] Clinical comparison of a xenogeneic collagen matrix versus subepithelial autogenous connective tissue graft for augmentation of soft tissue around implants
    De Angelis, P.
    De Angelis, S.
    Passarelli, P. C.
    Liguori, M. G.
    Pompa, G.
    Papi, P.
    Manicone, P. F.
    D'Addona, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 50 (07) : 956 - 963
  • [6] Coverage stability of peri-implant soft tissue dehiscence: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Amid, Reza
    Moscowchi, Anahita
    Azizi, Soroush
    Hosseini, Matineh
    Hartoonian, Serlie
    JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2024, 36 (02) : 284 - 294
  • [7] Comparative analysis of xenogeneic collagen matrix and autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft to increase soft tissue volume around dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ashurko, Igor
    Tarasenko, Svetlana
    Magdalyanova, Mary
    Bokareva, Svetlana
    Balyasin, Maxim
    Galyas, Anna
    Khamidova, Marina
    Zhornik, Mariia
    Unkovskiy, Alexey
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [8] Peri-implant soft tissue phenotype modification and its impact on peri-implant health: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Tavelli, Lorenzo
    Barootchi, Shayan
    Avila-Ortiz, Gustavo
    Urban, Istvan A.
    Giannobile, William, V
    Wang, Hom-Lay
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2021, 92 (01) : 21 - 44
  • [9] Connective tissue graft combined with autogenous bone graft in the treatment of peri-implant soft and hard tissue defect
    Deliberador, Tatiana Miranda
    Vieira, Juliana Souza
    Bonacin, Rodrigo
    Mueller Storrer, Carmen L.
    Santos, Felipe Rychuv
    Giovanini, Allan Fernando
    QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 46 (02): : 139 - 144
  • [10] Xenogeneic collagen matrix versus connective tissue graft for buccal soft tissue augmentation at implant site. A randomized, controlled clinical trial
    Cairo, Francesco
    Barbato, Luigi
    Tonelli, Paolo
    Batalocco, Guido
    Pagavino, Gabriella
    Nieri, Michele
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2017, 44 (07) : 769 - 776