Component Placement in Direct Lateral vs Minimally Invasive Anterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Radiographic Outcomes From a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:25
作者
Brun, Ole-Christian L. [1 ,2 ]
Sund, Helge N. [1 ,3 ]
Nordsletten, Lars [1 ,2 ]
Rohrl, Stephan M. [1 ]
Mjaaland, Knut E. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Ulleval Hosp, Div Orthopaed Surg, POB 4950 Nydalen, N-0424 Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[3] Sorlandet Hosp HF, Arendal, Kristiansand, Norway
关键词
total hip arthroplasty; randomized controlled trial; minimally invasive anterior approach; direct lateral approach; component placement; ACETABULAR COMPONENT; ANGLE; COMPLICATIONS; INCLINATION; WEAR;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.003
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: End-stage coxarthrosis is increasingly common; however, limited evidence exists on the effect of direct lateral approach (DLA) and minimally invasive direct anterior approach (MIDA) on component placement in total hip arthroplasty (THA). We therefore conducted a prospective, randomized controlled trial to determine the component placement in DLA vs MIDA in THA. Methods: Between January 2012 and June 2013, 164 patients with clinically and radiologically confirmed coxarthrosis aged 20-80 years were randomized to either DLA or MIDA (active comparator). Excluded were patients with previous ipsilateral hip surgery, a body mass index >35 kg/m(2), and/or mental disability. Primary clinical outcomes have been published elsewhere. Secondary outcomes included radiographic assessment of the acetabular component (cement-mantle thickness, inclination, and anteversion), femoral stem position (varus/valgus and THA index), offset restoration, and leg length discrepancy. Results: The mean cement-mantle was significantly thicker in zone 1 in the MIDA group (mean difference = 0.51 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09-0.93, P = .018), and the mean degrees of inclination and anteversion were higher in the MIDA group (mean difference = 2.5 degrees, 95% CI 0.3-4.6, P = .023 and mean difference = 3.6 degrees, 95% CI 2.2-5.0, P <. 0001, respectively). According to the defined reference range, cup inclination was more often adequate in the DLA group (67.9% (53/78) in the DLA group vs 52.4% (43/82) in the MIDA group, P = .045). There were no differences in frontal or lateral femoral stem position, global offset restoration, or leg length discrepancy. Conclusion: In this population of Norwegian patients with coxarthrosis, radiographic assessment showed limited differences in component placement between MIDA and DLA. The findings suggest that component placement is similar in the 2 surgical approaches. (c) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1718 / 1722
页数:5
相关论文
共 34 条
[21]   A review of symptomatic leg length inequality following total hip arthroplasty [J].
McWilliams, Anthony B. ;
Grainger, Andrew J. ;
O'Connor, Philip J. ;
Redmond, Anthony C. ;
Stewart, Todd D. ;
Stone, Martin H. .
HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 23 (01) :6-14
[22]   The direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE [J].
Meermans, G. ;
Konan, S. ;
Das, R. ;
Volpin, A. ;
Haddad, F. S. .
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2017, 99B (06) :732-740
[23]   The difference between the radiographic and the operative angle of inclination of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty USE OF A DIGITAL PROTRACTOR AND THE CIRCUMFERENCE OF THE HIP TO IMPROVE ORIENTATION [J].
Meermans, G. ;
Goetheer-Smits, I. ;
Lim, R. F. ;
Van Doorn, W. J. ;
Kats, J. .
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2015, 97B (05) :603-610
[24]   Do Postoperative Results Differ in a Randomized Trial Between a Direct Anterior and a Direct Lateral Approach in THA? [J].
Mjaaland, Knut Erik ;
Kivle, Kjetil ;
Svenningsen, Svein ;
Nordsletten, Lars .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2019, 477 (01) :145-155
[25]   Comparison of Markers for Muscle Damage, Inflammation, and Pain Using Minimally Invasive Direct Anterior Versus Direct Lateral Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial [J].
Mjaaland, Knut Erik ;
Kivle, Kjetil ;
Svenningsen, Svein ;
Pripp, Are Hugo ;
Nordsletten, Lars .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2015, 33 (09) :1305-1310
[26]  
Pogliacomi Francesco, 2012, Acta Biomed, V83, P114
[27]   A prospective randomized comparison of the minimally invasive direct anterior and the transgluteal approach for primary total hip arthroplasty [J].
Reichert, Johannes C. ;
von Rottkay, Eberhard ;
Roth, Franz ;
Renz, Tim ;
Hausmann, Johannes ;
Kranz, Julius ;
Rackwitz, Lars ;
Noeth, Ulrich ;
Rudert, Maximilian .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2018, 19
[28]   Comparative retrospective study of the direct anterior and transgluteal approaches for primary total hip arthroplasty [J].
Reichert, Johannes C. ;
Volkmann, Maximilian R. ;
Koppmair, Maximilian ;
Rackwitz, Lars ;
Ludemann, Martin ;
Rudert, Maximilian ;
Noeth, Ulrich .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 39 (12) :2309-2313
[29]   Increased Complications in Obese Patients Undergoing Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty [J].
Russo, Matthew W. ;
Macdonell, J. Ryan ;
Paulus, Megan C. ;
Keller, Jarod M. ;
Zawadsky, Mark W. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2015, 30 (08) :1384-1387
[30]  
Scheerlinck T, 2014, ACTA ORTHOP BELG, V80, P336