Component Placement in Direct Lateral vs Minimally Invasive Anterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Radiographic Outcomes From a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:25
作者
Brun, Ole-Christian L. [1 ,2 ]
Sund, Helge N. [1 ,3 ]
Nordsletten, Lars [1 ,2 ]
Rohrl, Stephan M. [1 ]
Mjaaland, Knut E. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Ulleval Hosp, Div Orthopaed Surg, POB 4950 Nydalen, N-0424 Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[3] Sorlandet Hosp HF, Arendal, Kristiansand, Norway
关键词
total hip arthroplasty; randomized controlled trial; minimally invasive anterior approach; direct lateral approach; component placement; ACETABULAR COMPONENT; ANGLE; COMPLICATIONS; INCLINATION; WEAR;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.003
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: End-stage coxarthrosis is increasingly common; however, limited evidence exists on the effect of direct lateral approach (DLA) and minimally invasive direct anterior approach (MIDA) on component placement in total hip arthroplasty (THA). We therefore conducted a prospective, randomized controlled trial to determine the component placement in DLA vs MIDA in THA. Methods: Between January 2012 and June 2013, 164 patients with clinically and radiologically confirmed coxarthrosis aged 20-80 years were randomized to either DLA or MIDA (active comparator). Excluded were patients with previous ipsilateral hip surgery, a body mass index >35 kg/m(2), and/or mental disability. Primary clinical outcomes have been published elsewhere. Secondary outcomes included radiographic assessment of the acetabular component (cement-mantle thickness, inclination, and anteversion), femoral stem position (varus/valgus and THA index), offset restoration, and leg length discrepancy. Results: The mean cement-mantle was significantly thicker in zone 1 in the MIDA group (mean difference = 0.51 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09-0.93, P = .018), and the mean degrees of inclination and anteversion were higher in the MIDA group (mean difference = 2.5 degrees, 95% CI 0.3-4.6, P = .023 and mean difference = 3.6 degrees, 95% CI 2.2-5.0, P <. 0001, respectively). According to the defined reference range, cup inclination was more often adequate in the DLA group (67.9% (53/78) in the DLA group vs 52.4% (43/82) in the MIDA group, P = .045). There were no differences in frontal or lateral femoral stem position, global offset restoration, or leg length discrepancy. Conclusion: In this population of Norwegian patients with coxarthrosis, radiographic assessment showed limited differences in component placement between MIDA and DLA. The findings suggest that component placement is similar in the 2 surgical approaches. (c) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1718 / 1722
页数:5
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Influence of cup orientation on the wear performance of metal-on-metal hip replacements [J].
Angadji, A. ;
Royle, M. ;
Collins, S. N. ;
Shelton, J. C. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART H-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE, 2009, 223 (H4) :449-457
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, ORTHOP REV PAVIA
[3]   ABDUCTOR FUNCTION AFTER TOTAL HIP-REPLACEMENT - AN ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC AND CLINICAL REVIEW [J].
BAKER, AS ;
BITOUNIS, VC .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1989, 71 (01) :47-50
[4]   The direct anterior minimal invasive approach in total hip replacement: a prospective departmental study on the learning curve [J].
Brun, Ole-Christian L. ;
Mansson, Lukas ;
Nordsletten, Lars .
HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 28 (02) :156-160
[5]   STRESS DISTRIBUTIONS IN THE ACETABULAR REGION .2. EFFECTS OF CEMENT THICKNESS AND METAL BACKING OF THE TOTAL HIP ACETABULAR COMPONENT [J].
CARTER, DR ;
VASU, R ;
HARRIS, WH .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1982, 15 (03) :165-170
[6]  
Charnley J, 1978, LOW FRICTION ARTHROP, V1
[7]   Direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: Comparative outcomes and contemporary results [J].
Connolly, Keith P. ;
Kamath, Atul F. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS, 2016, 7 (02) :94-101
[8]   Learning curve in tissue sparing total hip replacement: Comparison between different approaches [J].
D'Arrigo C. ;
Speranza A. ;
Monaco E. ;
Carcangiu A. ;
Ferretti A. .
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2009, 10 (1) :47-54
[9]   Is there a role for femoral offset restoration during total hip arthroplasty? A systematic review [J].
De Fine, M. ;
Romagnoli, M. ;
Toscano, A. ;
Bondi, A. ;
Nanni, M. ;
Zaffagnini, S. .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2017, 103 (03) :349-355
[10]   High complication rate in the early experience of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty by the direct anterior approach [J].
Spaans, A. J. ;
Van den Hout, J. A. A. M. ;
Bolder, S. B. T. .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2013, 84 (01) :116-117