Whole Grains, Refined Grains, and Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies

被引:75
|
作者
Gaesser, Glenn A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Coll Hlth Solut, Phoenix, AZ 85004 USA
关键词
diet; fiber; cereals; chronic disease; epidemiology; cohort; case-control; mortality; DOSE-RESPONSE METAANALYSIS; ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY; COLORECTAL-CANCER; DIETARY FACTORS; STOMACH-CANCER; GASTRIC-CANCER; BREAST-CANCER; PROSTATE-CANCER; GLYCEMIC INDEX; FIBER INTAKE;
D O I
10.3390/nu12123756
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for meta-analyses that provided risk estimates (+/- 95% confidence intervals) for associations between intakes of whole and refined grains and risk of total and site-specific cancer. The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Only meta-analyses that included whole grains and refined grains as separate food groups, and not as part of dietary patterns, were included. A total of 17 publications were identified that met inclusion criteria. Within these, results from a total of 54 distinct meta-analyses were reported for whole grains and 5 meta-analyses for refined grains. For total cancer mortality, 7 meta-analyses of cohort studies indicated that whole grain intake was associated with 6% to 12% lower risk in comparison of highest vs. lowest intake groups, and 3% to 20% lower risk for doses ranging from 15 to 90 g/day. For site-specific cancers, meta-analyses indicated that whole grain intake was consistently associated with lower risks of colorectal, colon, gastric, pancreatic, and esophageal cancers. Limited data were available for refined grains, with only 4 publications providing risk estimates, and only 1 of the meta-analyses included more than 3 studies. High intake of refined grains was associated with increased risk of colon and gastric cancer. By contrast, in the only dose-response meta-analysis, each 90 g/day consumption of refined grains was associated with a 6% lower risk of total cancer. In addition to the limited number of published meta-analyses on refined grains, results were also weakened due to the fact that refined grains were frequently defined to include both staple grain foods and indulgent grain foods, and the majority of studies included in the meta-analyses provided no specific definition of refined grains. Overall, meta-analyses of cohort and case-control studies consistently demonstrate that whole grain intake is associated with lower risk of total and site-specific cancer, and support current dietary recommendations to increase whole grain consumption. By contrast, the relationship between refined grain intake and cancer risk is inconclusive.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 23
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Methodology and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies in psychiatric epidemiology: systematic review
    Brugha, Traolach S.
    Matthews, Ruth
    Morgan, Zoe
    Hill, Trevor
    Alonso, Jordi
    Jones, David R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 200 (06) : 446 - 453
  • [32] A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses on Gene Polymorphisms and Gastric Cancer Risk
    Gianfagna, Francesco
    De Feo, Emma
    van Duijn, Cornelia M.
    Ricciardi, Gualtiero
    Boccia, Stefania
    CURRENT GENOMICS, 2008, 9 (06) : 361 - 374
  • [33] Diet and ovarian cancer risk: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of cohort studies
    Sun, Hui
    Gong, Ting-Ting
    Xia, Yang
    Wen, Zhao-Yan
    Zhao, Long-Gang
    Zhao, Yu-Hong
    Wu, Qi-Jun
    CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2021, 40 (04) : 1682 - 1690
  • [34] Consumption of Fish and ω-3 Fatty Acids and Cancer Risk: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies
    Lee, Keum Hwa
    Seong, Hyo Jin
    Kim, Gaeun
    Jeong, Gwang Hun
    Kim, Jong Yeob
    Park, Hyunbong
    Jung, Eunyoung
    Kronbichler, Andreas
    Eisenhut, Michael
    Stubbs, Brendon
    Solmi, Marco
    Koyanagi, Ai
    Hong, Sung Hwi
    Dragioti, Elena
    Machado de Rezende, Leandro Fornias
    Jacob, Louis
    Keum, NaNa
    van der Vliet, Hans J.
    Cho, Eunyoung
    Veronese, Nicola
    Grosso, Giuseppe
    Ogino, Shuji
    Song, Mingyang
    Radua, Joaquim
    Jung, Sun Jae
    Thompson, Trevor
    Jackson, Sarah E.
    Smith, Lee
    Yang, Lin
    Oh, Hans
    Choi, Eun Kyoung
    Shin, Jae Il
    Giovannucci, Edward L.
    Gamerith, Gabriele
    ADVANCES IN NUTRITION, 2020, 11 (05) : 1134 - 1149
  • [35] Type 2 diabetes and cancer: umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies
    Tsilidis, Konstantinos K.
    Kasimis, John C.
    Lopez, David S.
    Ntzani, Evangelia E.
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 350
  • [36] Physical Activity and Liver Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses
    Lin, Zhan-Zhou
    Xu, Yong-Cheng
    Liu, Cai-Xia
    Lu, Xue-Lan
    Wen, Fan-Yuan
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE, 2021, 31 (01): : 86 - 90
  • [37] Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized trials, and observational studies
    Ranstam, Jonas
    Wagner, Philippe
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2022, 93 : 1 - 2
  • [38] Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized trials, and observational studies
    Ranstam, Jonas
    Wagner, Philippe
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2022, 93 : 1 - 2
  • [39] Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Implantation: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies
    Chatterjee, Arka
    Bajaj, Navkaranbir S.
    McMahon, William S.
    Cribbs, Marc G.
    White, Jeremy S.
    Mukherjee, Amrita
    Law, Mark A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2017, 6 (08):
  • [40] Hepatitis B virus and the risk of coronary heart disease: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analyses of observational studies
    Wang, Yaqin
    Xiong, Jianping
    Niu, Meng
    Xu, Weiyu
    Xu, Ke
    Zhong, Hongshan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 265 : 204 - 209