Compression and buckling after impact response of resin-infused thermoplastic and thermoset 3D woven composites

被引:70
作者
Shah, S. Z. H. [1 ]
Megat-Yusoff, P. S. M. [1 ]
Karuppanan, S. [1 ]
Choudhry, R. S. [2 ]
Din, Israr Ud [3 ]
Othman, A. R. [1 ]
Sharp, K. [4 ]
Gerard, P. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol PETRONAS, Dept Mech Engn, Bandar Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia
[2] Univ Derby, Sch Comp & Engn, Mech Engn Discipline, Derby, England
[3] Natl Univ Sci & Technol NUST, Res Ctr Modelling & Simulat, Islamabad, Pakistan
[4] TexTech Ind Inc, 1 City Ctr, Portland, ME 04101 USA
[5] ARKEMA, Grp Rech Lacq, F-64170 Lacq, France
关键词
Compression after impact (CAI); Thermoplastic; Thermoset; Damage tolerance; Buckling; 3D composite; AFTER-IMPACT; DAMAGE TOLERANCE; BEHAVIOR; TOUGHNESS; 2D;
D O I
10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108592
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Damage tolerance of a unique resin-infused thermoplastic (Elium) 3D fibre-reinforced composite (3D-FRC) is compared with the conventional resin-infused thermoset (Epoxy) 3D-FRC using compression after impact (CAI) tests and finite element simulations. Higher damage tolerance is demonstrated for the thermoplastic 3D-FRC as its CAI failure strength and CAI stiffness is nearly insensitive to the impact energy levels and subsequent damage, while in contrast, both these properties for the thermoset 3D-FRC get compromised significantly. The buckling performance shows a gradual, almost linear, reduction in critical buckling (44.5% reduction in 0-100 J) for the thermoplastic 3D-FRC. In comparison, the thermoset 3D-FRC shows a much steeper drop in critical buckling, which becomes more pronounced for the higher impact energy cases (84.5% reduction in 0-100 J). It is postulated that the local plastic deformation of the thermoplastic matrix at the impact site as well as better interfacial adhesion is responsible for its better damage tolerance.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, D7137D7137M17 ASTM I
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, D7136D7136M05 ASTM I
[3]   Comparative study on repeated impact response of E-glass fiber reinforced polypropylene & epoxy matrix composites [J].
Arikan, Volkan ;
Sayman, Onur .
COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING, 2015, 83 :1-6
[4]   Low velocity impact response of 3D angle-interlock Kevlar/basalt reinforced polypropylene composites [J].
Bandaru, Aswani Kumar ;
Patel, Shivdayal ;
Sachan, Yogesh ;
Alagirusamy, R. ;
Bhatnagar, Naresh ;
Ahmad, Suhail .
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2016, 105 :323-332
[5]   Low velocity impact response of 2D and 3D Kevlar/polypropylene composites [J].
Bandaru, Aswani Kumar ;
Chavan, Vikrant V. ;
Ahmad, Suhail ;
Alagirusamy, R. ;
Bhatnagar, Naresh .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPACT ENGINEERING, 2016, 93 :136-143
[6]   Mode I fracture toughness and fractographic investigation of carbon fibre composites with liquid Methylmethacrylate thermoplastic matrix [J].
Bhudolia, Somen K. ;
Perrotey, Pavel ;
Joshi, Sunil C. .
COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING, 2018, 134 :246-253
[7]   Optimizing Polymer Infusion Process for Thin Ply Textile Composites with Novel Matrix System [J].
Bhudolia, Somen K. ;
Perrotey, Pavel ;
Joshi, Sunil C. .
MATERIALS, 2017, 10 (03)
[8]   Glass fibres reinforced acrylic thermoplastic resin-based tri-block copolymers composites: Low velocity impact response at various temperatures [J].
Boumbimba, R. Matadi ;
Coulibaly, M. ;
Khabouchi, A. ;
Kinvi-Dossou, G. ;
Bonfoh, N. ;
Gerard, P. .
COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2017, 160 :939-951
[9]   Observations of damage development from compression-after-impact experiments using ex situ micro-focus computed tomography [J].
Bull, D. J. ;
Spearing, S. M. ;
Sinclair, I. .
COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 97 :106-114
[10]   Impact behaviour of composites with different fibre architecture [J].
Chen, F. ;
Hodgkinson, J. M. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART G-JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2009, 223 (G7) :1009-1017