Quality of nuchal translucency measurements in The Netherlands: a quantitative analysis

被引:20
作者
Koster, M. P. H. [1 ,2 ]
Wortelboer, E. J. [2 ]
Engels, M. A. J. [3 ]
Stoutenbeek, P. H. [2 ]
Elvers, L. H. [1 ]
Visser, G. H. A. [2 ]
Schielen, P. C. J. I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm RIVM, Diagnost Lab Infect Dis & Perinatal Screening, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Div Perinatol & Gynaecol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Free Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr Amsterdam VUMC, Div Perinatol & Gynaecol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Down syndrome; nuchal translucency; prenatal screening; quality assurance; DOWN-SYNDROME; DELTA-NT; ULTRASOUND; 1ST-TRIMESTER; MULTICENTER; THICKNESS; MEDIANS;
D O I
10.1002/uog.6398
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective The Dutch Centre for Population Research has specified quality demands for nuchal translucency (NT) measurement in The Netherlands. We performed an analysis of the quality of NT measurement in 2005-2006 and its influence on screening performance. Methods This was a retrospective study of records of NT measurements (n = 27738) obtained between January 2005 and December 2006 retrieved from the Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM). The performance of each individual operator was analyzed with regard to the quality standards, which involved calculation of operator-specific median NT-multiples of the median (MoM) values. For the entire population of operators, a curve was determined describing the relationship between crown-rump length and NT. Detection rates (DR) and false-positive rates (FPR) for Down syndrome were modeled with this new curve and compared to those originally obtained using previously published reference data. Results Only 22% of all operators met the quality requirement of performing more than 150 NT measurements per year. However, no relationship teas found between the number of measurements per operator and their median NT-MoM. The mean of all operator-specific median NT-MoM values was 0.94 (target value 1.0). Overall, operators with The Fetal Medicine Foundation certificate measured a significantly higher median NT-MoM (mean of operator-specific medians, 0.98) as compared to the non-certified operators (0.92). During the study period, the monthly median NT-MoM of all operators rose steadily, from 0.86 in January 2005 to 0.96 in December 2006. Recalculation of the risk for Dozen syndrome after adjusting the reference NT medians using our own data led to a modeled 4% increase in DR at a 5% FPR. Conclusion Improved monitoring of NT measurement put into effect during the study period seems to have led to an improvement in the accuracy of measurements. Strict quality demands, continued monitoring and scrupulous evaluation of individual operators is likely to lead to an even better performance. Copyright (C) 2009 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 141
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Real-time quality control of nuchal translucency measurements using the exponentially weighted moving average chart
    Hynek, Martin
    Zvarova, Jana
    Smetanova, Dagmar
    Stejskal, David
    Kalina, Jan
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 60 (01): : 84 - 89
  • [42] Assessment of sonographer nuchal translucency measurement performance - central tendency and dispersion
    Sahota, Daljit Singh
    Chen, Min
    Leung, Tak Yeung
    Chan, Lin Wai
    Fung, Tak Yuen
    Ting, Yuen Ha
    Lau, Tze Kin
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2011, 24 (06) : 812 - 816
  • [43] Difference in nuchal translucency between monozygotic and dizygotic spontaneously conceived twins
    Cheng, Po-Jen
    Huang, Shang-Yu
    Shaw, Sheng-Wen
    Hsiao, Ching-Hwa
    Kao, Chuan-Chi
    Chueh, Ho-Yen
    Hsieh, T'sang-T'ang
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2010, 30 (03) : 247 - 250
  • [44] Nuchal translucency: This is not so simple!
    Constant, M.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2014, 42 (12): : 820 - 821
  • [45] Setting up a Nuchal Translucency Clinic What Radiologists Need to Know
    Onyeacholem, Ifeanyi
    Kleiner, Beth
    Hull, Andrew D.
    Chibuk, Jason
    Romine, Lorene
    Anton, Tracy
    Pretorius, Dolores H.
    ULTRASOUND QUARTERLY, 2016, 32 (01) : 3 - 14
  • [46] Nuchal translucency screening: How do women actually utilize the results?
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    Musci, Thomas J.
    Belluomini, Jenny
    Main, Denise
    Otto, Carl
    Goldberg, James
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2007, 27 (02) : 119 - 123
  • [47] Reliability of manual and semi-automated measurements of nuchal translucency by experienced operators
    Pruksanusak, Ninlapa
    Pranpanus, Savitree
    Suwanrath, Chitkasaem
    Kor-anantakul, Ounjai
    Suntharasaj, Thitima
    Hanprasertpong, Tharangrut
    Liabsuetrakul, Tippawan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2013, 121 (03) : 240 - 242
  • [48] Quality assurance in prenatal screening for aneuploidies. epidemiologic assessment and quality control in nuchal translucency measurements: Results in a tertiary hospital over a 3-year period
    Paraiso Torras, B.
    Carretero Gomez, J. F.
    Maldonado del Valle, M. D.
    Penalver Marquina, I.
    Canete Palomo, M. L.
    CLINICA E INVESTIGACION EN GINECOLOGIA Y OBSTETRICIA, 2016, 43 (04): : 150 - 153
  • [49] Nuchal translucency screening for fetal Down's syndrome
    Dizdarevic, Jadranka
    Izetbegovic, Sebija
    Dekovic, Sanjin
    Stojkanovic, Goran
    HEALTHMED, 2011, 5 (04): : 956 - 959
  • [50] Nuchal Translucency Thickness Measurement in Fetal Ultrasound Images to Analyze Down Syndrome
    Thomas, Mary Christeena
    Arjunan, Sridhar P.
    Viswanathan, Rekha
    IETE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH, 2023, 69 (08) : 4989 - 4999