Accuracy of Computed Tomographic Colonography for the Detection of Polyps and Colorectal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:45
作者
Chaparro, Maria [1 ]
Gisbert, Javier P. [1 ]
del Campo, Lourdes [2 ]
Cantero, Jose [1 ]
Mate, Jose [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Invest Biomed Red Enfermedades Hepat & Digest, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Madrid, Spain
[2] La Princesa Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Computed tomography colonography; Virtual colonoscopy; Polyps; Colorectal cancer; Computed tomographic colonoscopy; Computed tomographic colonography; MULTISLICE CT COLONOGRAPHY; CONTRAST BARIUM ENEMA; VIRTUAL COLONOSCOPY; CONVENTIONAL COLONOSCOPY; AIDED DIAGNOSIS; SINGLE-CENTER; CM; CANCER; NEOPLASIA; LESIONS;
D O I
10.1159/000215387
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The real accuracy of computed tomographic colonography (CTC) is still unknown. Objective: To perform a meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of CTC for the detection of polyps and colorectal tumors. Methods: Selection of studies: Studies assessing the accuracy of CTC for the detection of colorectal polyps and tumors were selected. Data synthesis: Meta-analyses combining sensitivities, specificities and likelihood ratios (LRs) for the diagnosis of polyps and colorectal tumors were carried out. Results: Forty-seven studies, providing data of 10,546 patients, were included. Overall per-polyp sensitivity of CTC was 66% (64-68%), for polyps 6-9 mm in size it was 59% (56-61%), and 76% (73-79%) for polyps larger than 9 mm. Overall per-patient sensitivity was 69% (66-72%), for polyps 6-9 mm 60% (56-65%), and 83% (70-85%) for lesions larger than 9 mm. Overall CTC specificity was 83% (81-84%). Positive and negative LRs were 2.9 (1.8-4) and 0.38 (0.27-0.53), respectively; for polyps 6-9 mm in size, they were 3.8 (2.5-5.7) and 0.4 (0.27-0.59), and 12.3 (7.7-19.4) and 0.19 (0.12-0.3) for polyps larger than 9 mm. Conclusion: CTC is highly specific for the detection of colorectal polyps and tumors. Some studies reported high sensitivities, but the results of the studies were highly heterogeneous, while the studied variables explained only part of this discrepancy. Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 17
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 10 mm or Larger Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Garg, Rajat
    Singh, Amandeep
    Aggarwal, Manik
    Bhalla, Jaideep
    Mohan, Babu P.
    Burke, Carol
    Rustagi, Tarun
    Chahal, Prabhleen
    CLINICAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 54 (03) : 379 - 389
  • [32] Artificial intelligence can increase the detection rate of colorectal polyps and adenomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Jianglei
    Lu, Jiaxi
    Yan, Jin
    Tan, Yuyong
    Liu, Deliang
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 33 (08) : 1041 - 1048
  • [33] The efficacy and safety of sulindac for colorectal polyps A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Long, Qing
    Ao, Liang
    Li, Kuo
    Li, Yan
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (41) : E22402
  • [34] Underwater versus conventional EMR for colorectal polyps: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Choi, Alyssa Y.
    Moosvi, Zain
    Shah, Sagar
    Roccato, Mary Kathryn
    Wang, Andrew Y.
    Hamerski, Christopher M.
    Samarasena, Jason B.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 93 (02) : 378 - 389
  • [35] Safety and efficacy of underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs
    Chandan, Saurabh
    Bapaye, Jay
    Khan, Shahab R. R.
    Mohan, Babu P. P.
    Ramai, Daryl
    Dahiya, Dushyant S. S.
    Bilal, Mohammad
    Draganov, Peter V. V.
    Othman, Mohamed O. O.
    Sanchez, Joaquin Rodriguez
    Kochhar, Gursimran S. S.
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2023, 11 (08) : E768 - E777
  • [36] The efficacy and safety of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for ≥10-mm colorectal polyps: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, De-feng
    Lai, Ming-Guang
    Yang, Mei-feng
    Zou, Zhi-yuan
    Xu, Jing
    Peng, Ru-mei
    Xiong, Feng
    Wei, Cheng
    Zhang, Ding-guo
    Xu, Zheng-lei
    Wang, Li-sheng
    Yao, Jun
    ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 53 (06) : 636 - 646
  • [37] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY COLONOGRAPHY IN COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Hanly, Paul
    Skally, Mairead
    Fenlon, Helen
    Sharp, Linda
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2012, 28 (04) : 415 - 423
  • [38] CT colonography for surveillance of patients with colorectal cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic efficacy
    François Porté
    Mallikarjuna Uppara
    George Malietzis
    Omar Faiz
    Steve Halligan
    Thanos Athanasiou
    David Burling
    European Radiology, 2017, 27 : 51 - 60
  • [39] Underwater vs conventional endoscopic mucosal resection in the management of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kamal, Faisal
    Khan, Muhammad Ali
    Lee-Smith, Wade
    Khan, Zubair
    Sharma, Sachit
    Tombazzi, Claudio
    Ahmad, Dina
    Ismail, Mohammad Kashif
    Howden, Colin W.
    Binmoeller, Kenneth F.
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2020, 08 (10) : E1264 - E1272
  • [40] A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Convolutional Neural Network in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps and Cancer
    Keshtkar, Kamyab
    Safarpour, Ali Reza
    Heshmat, Ramin
    Sotoudehmanesh, Rasoul
    Keshtkar, Abbas
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 34 (10) : 985 - +