Docking-based 3D-QSAR (CoMFA, CoMFA-RG, CoMSIA) study on hydroquinoline and thiazinan-4-one derivatives as selective COX-2 inhibitors

被引:13
作者
Beirami, Amirreza Dowlati [1 ]
Hajimahdi, Zahra [2 ]
Zarghi, Afshin [2 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Sch Pharm, Student Res Comm, Tehran, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Sch Pharm, Dept Med Chem, Tehran, Iran
关键词
CoMFA; CoMFA-RG; CoMSIA; COX-2; inhibitors; docking study; hydroquinoline; thiazinan-4-one; BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION; DESIGN; BINDING; QSAR; MLR;
D O I
10.1080/07391102.2018.1502687
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A series of 26 selective COX-2 inhibitors which reported previously by our laboratory was selected to generate three-dimensional quantitative structure activity relationship (3D-QSAR) model. Active conformation of each molecule was predicted by docking studies and used for molecular alignment. Activity of 20 molecules as a train set was predicted using three methods including comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA), CoMFA region focusing (CoMFA-RG) and comparative molecular similarity index analysis (CoMSIA). The best models of CoMFA-RG and CoMSIA revealed correlation coefficients r(2) of 0.955 and 0.947, the leave one out cross-validation coefficients q(2) of 0.573 and 0.574, respectively. In addition, CoMFA-RG and CoMSIA models were validated by a test set of six molecules with predicted coefficients r(pred)(2) of 0.644 and 0.799, respectively. Contour maps of generated models provided fruitful information about structural aspect of molecules that affected their COX-2 inhibitory activity. Based on three models results, steric and electrostatic properties are the most important factors in controlling the activity of the molecules. Results of CoMFA-RG and CoMSIA models were utilized to design new molecules. Comparison of experimental and predicted pIC(50) values of designed molecules indicated that CoMFA-RG had the more predictive ability. Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma
引用
收藏
页码:2999 / 3006
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of new tricyclic spiroisoxazoline derivatives as selective COX-2 inhibitors and study of their COX-2 binding modes via docking studies [J].
Abolhasani, Hoda ;
Dastmalchi, Siavoush ;
Hamzeh-Mivehroud, Maryam ;
Daraei, Bahram ;
Zarghi, Afshin .
MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (05) :858-869
[2]  
Akbari S, 2017, IRAN J PHARM RES, V16, P525
[3]   Deciphering the mechanism behind the varied binding activities of COXIBs through Molecular Dynamic Simulations, MM-PBSA binding energy calculations and per-residue energy decomposition studies [J].
Chaudhary, Neha ;
Aparoy, Polamarasetty .
JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR STRUCTURE & DYNAMICS, 2017, 35 (04) :868-882
[4]   COMPARATIVE MOLECULAR-FIELD ANALYSIS (COMFA) .1. EFFECT OF SHAPE ON BINDING OF STEROIDS TO CARRIER PROTEINS [J].
CRAMER, RD ;
PATTERSON, DE ;
BUNCE, JD .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1988, 110 (18) :5959-5967
[5]   Quantitative structure-activity relationships (HQSAR, CoMFA, and CoMSIA) studies for COX-2 selective inhibitors [J].
Gomes, Renan A. ;
Genesi, Giovani L. ;
Maltarollo, Vinicius G. ;
Trossini, Gustavo H. G. .
JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR STRUCTURE & DYNAMICS, 2017, 35 (07) :1436-1445
[6]  
Hajimahdi Z, 2016, IRAN J PHARM RES, V15, P439
[7]  
Hajimahdi Z, 2015, IRAN J PHARM RES, V14, P69
[8]   MOLECULAR SIMILARITY INDEXES IN A COMPARATIVE-ANALYSIS (COMSIA) OF DRUG MOLECULES TO CORRELATE AND PREDICT THEIR BIOLOGICAL-ACTIVITY [J].
KLEBE, G ;
ABRAHAM, U ;
MIETZNER, T .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 1994, 37 (24) :4130-4146
[9]  
Morris GM, 1998, J COMPUT CHEM, V19, P1639, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19981115)19:14<1639::AID-JCC10>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-B