Penile Sparing Surgery for Penile Cancer: A Multicenter International Retrospective Cohort

被引:63
作者
Baumgarten, Adam [1 ]
Chipollini, Juan [1 ]
Yan, Sylvia [2 ]
Ottenhof, Sarah R. [5 ]
Tang, Dominic H. [1 ]
Draeger, Desiree [3 ]
Protzel, Chris [3 ]
Zhu, Yao [4 ]
Ye, Ding-wei [4 ]
Hakenberg, Oliver W. [3 ]
Horenblas, Simon [5 ]
Watkin, Nicholas A. [2 ]
Spiess, Philippe E. [1 ]
机构
[1] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Genitourinary Oncol, Tampa, FL USA
[2] St Georges Healthcare Natl Hlth Serv Trust, Dept Urol, London, England
[3] Univ Hosp Rostock, Rostock, Germany
[4] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Urol Oncol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
penile neoplasms; neoplasm recurrence; local; organ sparing treatments; carcinoma; squamous cell; mortality; FOLLOW-UP; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY; SQUAMOUS CARCINOMA; MEN; GUIDELINES; T1;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2017.10.045
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We evaluated recurrence outcomes of penile sparing surgery in what is to our knowledge the largest multicenter cohort of patients to date. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively identified patients treated with penile sparing surgery from May 1990 to July 2016 at 5 tertiary referral institutions. Treatments consisted of circumcision, wide local excision, laser therapy with or without local excision, partial or total glansectomy and glans resurfacing. The study primary end point was local recurrence-free survival, defined from initial treatment to time of local recurrence and estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: After applying study exclusion criteria 1,188 patients were included in analysis. During the median followup of 43.0 months there were 252 local recurrences (21.2%), of which 99 (39.3%) developed in year 1. Median time to local recurrence was 16.3 months and the 5-year local recurrence-free survival incidence was 73.6%. When stratified by stage, the 5-year local recurrence-free survival rate was 75.0%, 71.4% and 75.9% in Ta/Tis, T1 and T2 cases, respectively (log rank p = 0.748). Of the recurrences 58.3% were treated with repeat organ sparing procedures and the secondary partial (total) penectomy rate was 19.0%. Only margin status was significantly associated with local recurrence on multivariate analysis (p = 0.001). Study limitations included the retrospective design and the heterogeneous clinical approach. Conclusions: Penile sparing surgery can provide excellent local control for superficial penile tumors as well as for appropriately selected invasive lesions. Strict followup in the early postoperative period is highly recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:1233 / 1237
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] The histological extent of the local spread of carcinoma of the penis and its therapeutic implications
    Agrawal, A
    Pai, D
    Ananthakrishnan, N
    Smile, SR
    Ratnakar, C
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 85 (03) : 299 - 301
  • [2] Peniscopically Controlled CO2 Laser Excision for Conservative Treatment of In Situ and T1 Penile Carcinoma: Report on 224 Patients
    Bandieramonte, Gaetano
    Colecchia, Maurizio
    Mariani, Luigi
    Lo Vullo, Salvatore
    Pizzocaro, Giorgio
    Piva, Luigi
    Nicolai, Nicola
    Salvioni, Roberto
    Lezzi, Valentina
    Stefanon, Bernardina
    De Palo, Giuseppe
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 54 (04) : 875 - 884
  • [3] Penile Cancer Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
    Clark, Peter E.
    Spiess, Philippe E.
    Agarwal, Neeraj
    Biagioli, Matthew C.
    Eisenberger, Mario A.
    Greenberg, Richard E.
    Herr, Harry W.
    Inman, Brant A.
    Kuban, Deborah A.
    Kuzel, Timothy M.
    Lele, Subodh M.
    Michalski, Jeff
    Pagliaro, Lance
    Pal, Sumanta K.
    Patterson, Anthony
    Plimack, Elizabeth R.
    Pohar, Kamal S.
    Porter, Michael P.
    Richie, Jerome P.
    Sexton, Wade J.
    Shipley, William U.
    Small, Eric J.
    Trump, Donald L.
    Wile, Geoffrey
    Wilson, Timothy G.
    Dwyer, Mary
    Ho, Maria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2013, 11 (05): : 594 - 615
  • [4] Penile Sparing Surgery for Penile Cancer-Does it Affect Survival?
    Djajadiningrat, Rosa S.
    van Werkhoven, Erik
    Meinhardt, Wim
    van Rhijn, Bas W. G.
    Bex, Axel
    van der Poel, Henk G.
    Horenblas, Simon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (01) : 120 - 125
  • [5] The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM
    Edge, Stephen B.
    Compton, Carolyn C.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (06) : 1471 - 1474
  • [6] Organ-sparing reconstructive surgery in penile cancer: initial experiences at two Swedish referral centres
    Hakansson, Ulf
    Kirrander, Peter
    Uvelius, Bengt
    Baseckas, Gediminas
    Torbrand, Christian
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 49 (02) : 149 - 154
  • [7] EAU Guidelines on Penile Cancer: 2014 Update
    Hakenberg, Oliver W.
    Comperat, Eva M.
    Minhas, Suks
    Necchi, Andrea
    Protzel, Chris
    Watkin, Nick
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 67 (01) : 142 - 150
  • [8] Organ Sparing Surgery for Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Kamel, Mohamed H.
    Bissada, Nabil
    Warford, Renee
    Farias, Judy
    Davis, Rodney
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 198 (04) : 770 - 779
  • [9] CARCINOMA OF PENIS
    KHEZRI, AA
    DUNN, M
    SMITH, PJB
    MITCHELL, JP
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1978, 50 (04): : 275 - 279
  • [10] Quality of Life for Patients Treated for Penile Cancer
    Kieffer, Jacobien M.
    Djajadiningrat, Rosa S.
    van Muilekom, Erik A. M.
    Graafland, Niels M.
    Horenblas, Simon
    Aaronson, Neil K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (04) : 1105 - 1110