The costs of crime during and after publicly funded treatment for opioid use disorders: a population-level study for the state of California

被引:31
作者
Krebs, Emanuel [1 ]
Urada, Darren [2 ]
Evans, Elizabeth [2 ]
Huang, David [2 ]
Hser, Yih-Ing [2 ]
Nosyk, Bohdan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] British Columbia Ctr Excellence HIV AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Integrated Subst Abuse Program, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Simon Fraser Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Burnaby, BC, Canada
关键词
California; costs of crime; heroin; opioid agonist treatment; opioid use disorder; prescription opioids; 33-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; METHADONE TREATMENT; DRUG-ABUSE; MAINTENANCE TREATMENT; ECONOMIC-IMPACT; HEROIN-ADDICTS; UNITED-STATES; DEPENDENCE; MORTALITY; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/add.13729
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and aimsTreatment for opioid use disorders (OUD) reduces the risk of mortality and infectious disease transmission; however, opportunities to quantify the potential economic benefits of associated decreases in drug-related crime are scarce. This paper aimed to estimate the costs of crime during and after periods of engagement in publicly funded treatment for OUD to compare total costs of crime during a hypothetical 6-month period following initiation of opioid agonist treatment (OAT) versus detoxification. DesignRetrospective, administrative data-based cohort study with comprehensive information on drug treatment and criminal justice systems interactions. SettingPublicly funded drug treatment facilities in California, USA (2006-10). ParticipantsA total of 31659 individuals admitted for the first time to treatment for OUD, and who were linked with criminal justice and mortality data, were followed during a median 2.3years. Median age at first treatment admission was 32, 35.8% were women and 37.1% primarily used prescription opioids. MeasurementsDaily costs of crime (US$2014) were calculated from a societal perspective and were composed of the costs of policing, court, corrections and criminal victimization. We estimated the average marginal effect of treatment engagement in OAT or detoxification adjusting for potential fixed and time-varying confounders, including drug use and criminal justice system involvement prior to treatment initiation. FindingsDaily costs of crime during treatment compared with after treatment were $126 lower for OAT [95% confidence interval (CI)=$116, $136] and $144 lower for detoxification (95% CI=$135, $154). Summing the costs of crime during and after treatment over a hypothetical 6-month period using the observed median durations of OAT (161days) and detoxification (19days), we estimated that enrolling an individual in OAT as opposed to detoxification would save $17550 ($16840, $18383). ConclusionsIn publicly funded drug treatment facilities in California, USA, engagement in treatment for opioid use disorders is associated with lower costs of crime in the 6months following initiation of treatment, and the economic benefits were far greater for individuals receiving time-unlimited treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:838 / 851
页数:14
相关论文
共 83 条
  • [1] An overview of systematic reviews of the effectiveness of opiate maintenance therapies: available evidence to inform clinical practice and research
    Amato, L
    Davoli, M
    Perucci, CA
    Ferri, M
    Faggiano, F
    Mattick, RP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2005, 28 (04) : 321 - 329
  • [2] Economic Costs of Diabetes in the U.S. in 2012
    Yang W.
    Dall T.M.
    Halder P.
    Gallo P.
    Kowal S.L.
    Hogan P.F.
    Petersen M.
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2013, 36 (04) : 1033 - 1046
  • [3] Adoption of Evidence-Based Clinical Innovations: The Case of Buprenorphine Use by Opioid Treatment Programs
    Andrews, Christina M.
    D'Aunno, Thomas A.
    Pollack, Harold A.
    Friedmann, Peter D.
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2014, 71 (01) : 43 - 60
  • [4] Anglin MD, 2007, J PSYCHOACTIVE DRUGS, P367
  • [5] Offender Diversion Into Substance Use Disorder Treatment: The Economic Impact of California's Proposition 36
    Anglin, M. Douglas
    Nosyk, Bohdan
    Jaffe, Adi
    Urada, Darren
    Evans, Elizabeth
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 103 (06) : 1096 - 1102
  • [6] Drug use and crime: A historical review of research conducted by the UCLA Drug Abuse Research Center
    Anglin, MD
    Perrochet, B
    [J]. SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE, 1998, 33 (09) : 1871 - 1914
  • [7] [Anonymous], GUIDELINE PHYS WORKI
  • [8] [Anonymous], BMJ
  • [9] [Anonymous], DRUG ALCOHOL DEPEND
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2018, POLIKLINISK RUSBEHAN