Techno-economic comparative assessment of novel lignin depolymerization routes to bio-based aromatics

被引:38
作者
Gursel, Iris Vural [1 ]
Dijkstra, Jan W. [2 ]
Huijgen, Wouter J. J. [2 ]
Ramirez, Andrea [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev Energy & Resource, Heidelberglaan 2, NL-3584 CS Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] TNO, ECN, Petten, Netherlands
[3] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management Energy & Ind, Delft, Netherlands
来源
BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR | 2019年 / 13卷 / 04期
关键词
lignin valorization; lignin depolymerization; techno-economic analysis; lignocellulosic biorefinery; pyrolysis; hydrodeoxygenation; hydrothermal upgrading; biobased aromatics; COILED FLOW INVERTER; CATALYTIC HYDROTREATMENT; TRANSPORTATION FUELS; KRAFT LIGNIN; ETHANOL-PRODUCTION; CHEMICALS; BIOREFINERIES; VALORIZATION; CONVERSION; PYROLYSIS;
D O I
10.1002/bbb.1999
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
This paper presents a techno-economic assessment of three novel routes for the production of bio-based aromatics from lignin. It aims to provide insights into their feasibility and hotspots at an early stage of development to guide further research and development and to facilitate commercialization. The lignin conversion routes are: (non-catalytic) lignin pyrolysis, direct hydrodeoxygenation (HDO), and hydrothermal upgrading (HyThUp). The products generated are mixed oxygenated aromatic monomers (MOAMON), light organics, heavy organics, and char. For the technical assessment, conceptual design followed by process modeling in Aspen Plus was based on experimental yields. The models generated indispensable data on material and energy flows. An economic assessment was then conducted by estimating operating and capital costs. Return on investment (ROI), payback period (PBP), and net present value (NPV) were used as key performance indicators. Downstream processing was especially demanding in the HyThUp process due to the presence of a significant flow rate of water in the system, which significantly increased external utility requirements. Due to complex separations, the HyThUp process showed the highest capital cost (35% more than pyrolysis). Operating costs were the highest for the direct HDO process (34% more than pyrolysis) due to the use of hydrogen. Overall, the direct HDO process showed the highest ROI (12%) and the shortest PBP (5 years) due to high yields of valuable heavy organics (32%) and MOAMON (24%). Direct HDO was found to be feasible with a positive NPV based on prices used in the assessment. Among the three processes investigated, the direct HDO process therefore appeared to be the most promising, and consideration should be given to further development and commercialization of this process. (c) 2019 The Authors. Biofuels, Bioproducts, and Biorefining published by Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1068 / 1084
页数:17
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Biological valorization of low molecular weight lignin [J].
Abdelaziz, Omar Y. ;
Brink, Daniel P. ;
Prothmann, Jens ;
Ravi, Krithika ;
Sun, Mingzhe ;
Garcia-Hidalgo, Javier ;
Sandahl, Margareta ;
Hulteberg, Christian P. ;
Turner, Charlotta ;
Liden, Gunnar ;
Gorwa-Grauslund, Marie F. .
BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES, 2016, 34 (08) :1318-1346
[2]   Experimental Studies on the Hydrotreatment of Kraft Lignin to Aromatics and Alkylphenolics Using Economically Viable Fe-Based Catalysts [J].
Agarwal, Shilpa ;
Chowdari, Ramesh Kumar ;
Hita, Idoia ;
Heeres, Hero Jan .
ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2017, 5 (03) :2668-2678
[3]   Techno-economic comparison of biomass-to-transportation fuels via pyrolysis, gasification, and biochemical pathways [J].
Anex, Robert P. ;
Aden, Andy ;
Kazi, Feroz Kabir ;
Fortman, Joshua ;
Swanson, Ryan M. ;
Wright, Mark M. ;
Satrio, Justinus A. ;
Brown, Robert C. ;
Daugaard, Daren E. ;
Platon, Alex ;
Kothandaraman, Geetha ;
Hsu, David D. ;
Dutta, Abhijit .
FUEL, 2010, 89 :S29-S35
[4]   Liquid fuels, hydrogen and chemicals from lignin: A critical review [J].
Azadi, Pooya ;
Inderwildi, Oliver R. ;
Farnood, Ramin ;
King, David A. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 21 :506-523
[5]   The Techno-Economic Basis for Coproduct Manufacturing To Enable Hydrocarbon Fuel Production from Lignocellulosic Biomass [J].
Biddy, Mary J. ;
Davis, Ryan ;
Humbird, David ;
Tao, Ling ;
Dowe, Nancy ;
Guarnieri, Michael T. ;
Linger, Jeffrey G. ;
Karp, Eric M. ;
Salvachua, Davinia ;
Vardon, Derek R. ;
Beckham, Gregg T. .
ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2016, 4 (06) :3196-3211
[6]  
Bozell JJ, 2007, PNNL16983 NREL, VII
[7]  
Brebu M, 2010, CELL CHEM TECHNOL, V44, P353
[8]   Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading [J].
Bridgwater, A. V. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2012, 38 :68-94
[9]   Fuel ethanol production:: Process design trends and integration opportunities [J].
Cardona, Carlos A. ;
Sanchez, Oscar J. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 98 (12) :2415-2457
[10]   Continuous Hydrolysis and Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation of an Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient Intermediate Using a Miniscale Hydrophobic Membrane Separator [J].
Cervera-Padrell, Albert E. ;
Morthensen, Sofie T. ;
Lewandowski, Daniel J. ;
Skovby, Tommy ;
Kiil, Soren ;
Gernaey, Krist V. .
ORGANIC PROCESS RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 16 (05) :888-900