Key Aesthetic Appeal Concepts of Coastal Dunes and Forests on the Example of the Curonian Spit (Lithuania)

被引:21
作者
Urbis, Arvydas [1 ]
Povilanskas, Ramunas [1 ]
Simanauskiene, Rasa [2 ]
Taminskas, Julius [2 ]
机构
[1] Klaipeda Univ, Dept Nat Sci, Herkaus Manto Str 84, LT-92294 Klaipeda, Lithuania
[2] Nat Res Ctr, Lab Climate & Water Res, Akademijos Str 2, LT-08412 Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
aesthetic appeal; Baltic Sea; coastal dunes; Curonian Spit; Delphi technique; paired comparison survey; psychophysical approach; VISUAL LANDSCAPE; SCENIC-BEAUTY; TOURISM MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; NATIONAL-PARK; QUALITY; PERCEPTION; NATURALNESS; ATTRIBUTES; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.3390/w11061193
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The main objective of the study was to elicit key concepts determining the aesthetic appeal of coastal dunes and forests using the example of the Curonian Spit (Lithuania). The mixed approach included three methods: (1) paired comparison survey of 45 coastal landscapes, (2) semi-structured interviews with local inhabitants, and (3) eliciting the key aesthetic appeal concepts by a panel of experts using the Delphi technique. The results of the paired comparison survey show that the most aesthetically appealing landscapes of the Curonian Spit are: (1) white mobile dunes, (2) white dunes with grey (grassland) dunes in the background, and (3) grey dunes with white dunes in the background. The local inhabitants considered the concept of visual coherence as the best, explaining the aesthetic appeal of the dune and the forest landscapes on the spit. The experts of the Delphi survey considered that the concepts of stewardship, naturalness, imageability, and visual scale best define the scenic appeal. The appeal of the least attractive landscapes, in their opinion, was shaped by the concepts of naturalness, disturbance, and complexity. We conclude that the notions of visitors, local inhabitants and experts differ on the aesthetic appeal concepts of coastal dunes and forests, suggesting potential management conflicts.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 106 条
  • [71] Palmer J.F., 2000, LANDSCAPE J, V19, P166, DOI [10.3368/lj.19.1-2.166, DOI 10.3368/LJ.19.1-2.166, https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.19.1-2.166]
  • [72] Rating reliability and representation validity in scenic landscape assessments
    Palmer, JF
    Hoffman, RE
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2001, 54 (1-4) : 149 - 161
  • [73] Good looking: in defense of scenic landscape aesthetics
    Parsons, R
    Daniel, TC
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2002, 60 (01) : 43 - 56
  • [74] Comparing the visual perception and aesthetic evaluation of natural landscapes in Russia and Japan: cultural and environmental factors
    Petrova, Elena G.
    Mironov, Yury V.
    Aoki, Yoji
    Matsushima, Hajime
    Ebine, Satoshi
    Furuya, Katsunori
    Petrova, Anastasia
    Takayama, Norimasa
    Ueda, Hirofumi
    [J]. PROGRESS IN EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE, 2015, 2
  • [75] Pham HP, 2018, TRANSFUSION MEDICINE, APHERESIS, AND HEMOSTASIS: REVIEW QUESTIONS AND CASE STUDIES, P17, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-803999-1.00002-X
  • [76] An incremental scenic assessment of the Glamorgan Heritage Coast, UK
    Phillips, M. R.
    Edwards, A. M.
    Williams, A. T.
    [J]. GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 176 : 291 - 303
  • [77] The core of heritage tourism
    Poria, Y
    Butler, R
    Airey, D
    [J]. ANNALS OF TOURISM RESEARCH, 2003, 30 (01) : 238 - 254
  • [78] Islands of prescription and islands of negotiation
    Povilanskas, Ramunas
    Armaitiene, Ausrine
    Dyack, Brenda
    Jurkus, Egidijus
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DESTINATION MARKETING & MANAGEMENT, 2016, 5 (03) : 260 - 274
  • [79] Can visitors visually distinguish successive coastal landscapes? A case study from the Curonian Spit (Lithuania)
    Povilanskas, Ramunas
    Baziuke, Dalia
    Ducinskas, Kestutis
    Urbis, Arvydas
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 119 : 109 - 118
  • [80] Marketing of coastal barrier spits as liminal spaces of creativity
    Povilanskas, Ramunas
    Armaitiene, Ausrine
    [J]. 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STRATEGIC INNOVATIVE MARKETING, 2014, 148 : 397 - 403