Selecting indicators for the quality of diabetes care at the health systems level in OECD countries

被引:77
作者
Nicolucci, Antonio [1 ]
Greenfield, Sheldon
Mattke, Soeren
机构
[1] Ist Ric Farmacol Mario Negri, Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, Dept Clin Pharmacol & Epidemiol, I-66030 Santa Maria Imbaro, CH, Italy
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Ctr Hlth Policy Res, Irvine, CA USA
[3] OECD Hlth Policy Unit, Paris, France
关键词
diabetes mellitus; quality of care; quality indicators; process easures; outcome measures;
D O I
10.1093/intqhc/mzl023
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose. In the context of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Quality Indicators Project, a set of quality indicators for diabetes care was developed, to be used for benchmarking the performance of health care systems. Background. Diabetes complications markedly reduce quality and length of life and are also responsible for enormous health care costs. A large body of evidence has shown that several effective treatments and practices may substantially reduce this burden. However, a marked variability has been documented in preventive and therapeutic approaches, thus suggesting that the level of diabetes care currently delivered may not produce the possible health-related gains. Methods. Existing quality indicators have been reviewed, with particular attention to the work done by the National Diabetes Quality Improvement Alliance ( NDQIA) in the US. All the measures identified were evaluated for their importance, scientific soundness, and feasibility. In addition, the panel members selected new distal outcome measures. These measures are currently not used in provider comparisons, but they could reveal valuable insight into the differential performance of health systems. Results. Four process and two proximal outcome measures were selected among those endorsed by the NDQIA. In addition, three new long-term outcome measures have been proposed to gain insight into whether and to what degree differences in the processes and intermediate outcomes that are captured by the established measures translate into better outcomes for patients. Conclusions. The measures selected can contribute to policymakers' and researchers' understanding of differences in the quality of diabetes care between health systems. Further work is required to assess the availability of reliable and comparable data across OECD countries.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 30
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, DIABETES CARE, V28, pS4
[2]   Quality of care and outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients [J].
De Berardis, G ;
Pellegrini, F ;
Franciosi, M ;
Belfiglio, M ;
Di Nardo, B ;
Greenfield, S ;
Kaplan, SH ;
Rossi, MCE ;
Sacco, M ;
Tognoni, G ;
Valentini, M ;
Nicolucci, A .
DIABETES CARE, 2004, 27 (02) :398-406
[3]   The Diabetes Quality Improvement Project - Moving science into health policy to gain an edge on the diabetes epidemic [J].
Fleming, BB ;
Greenfield, S ;
Engelgau, MM ;
Pogach, LM ;
Clauser, SB ;
Parrott, MA .
DIABETES CARE, 2001, 24 (10) :1815-1820
[4]   COMMON CAUSES OF BLINDNESS AND VISUAL HANDICAP IN THE WEST OF SCOTLAND [J].
GHAFOUR, IM ;
ALLAN, D ;
FOULDS, WS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1983, 67 (04) :209-213
[5]  
GREENFIELD S, 15 OECD
[6]   Diabetes and decline in heart disease mortality in US adults [J].
Gu, K ;
Cowie, CC ;
Harris, MI .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 281 (14) :1291-1297
[7]   Mortality in adults with and without diabetes in a national cohort of the US population, 1971-1993 [J].
Gu, K ;
Cowie, CC ;
Harris, MI .
DIABETES CARE, 1998, 21 (07) :1138-1145
[8]   Coronary heart disease in patients with diabetes [J].
Haffner, SM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (14) :1040-1042
[9]   Change in the quality of care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries, 1998-1999 to 2000-2001 [J].
Jencks, SF ;
Huff, ED ;
Cuerdon, T .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (03) :305-312
[10]   Revealing the cost of Type II diabetes in Europe [J].
Jönsson, B .
DIABETOLOGIA, 2002, 45 (07) :S5-S12