Tracking the Effect of Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Cortical Excitability and Connectivity by Means of TMS-EEG

被引:36
作者
Varoli, Erica [1 ,2 ]
Pisoni, Alberto [2 ,3 ]
Mattavelli, Giulia C. [2 ,3 ]
Vergallito, Alessandra [2 ,3 ]
Gallucci, Alessia [3 ]
Mauro, Lilia D. [3 ]
Rosanova, Mario [4 ,5 ]
Bolognini, Nadia [2 ,3 ,6 ]
Vallar, Giuseppe [2 ,3 ,6 ]
Lauro, Leonor J. Romero [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Med & Surg, PhD Program Neurosci, Monza, Italy
[2] NeuroMi Milan Ctr Neurosci, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Psychol, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Milan, Dept Biomed & Clin Sci L Sacco, Milan, Italy
[5] Fdn Europea Ric Biomed Onus, Milan, Italy
[6] IRCCS Ist Auxol, Lab Neuropsychol, Milan, Italy
关键词
cathodal tDCS; TMS-EEG; cortical excitability; posterior parietal cortex; neuromodulation; HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX; PRIMARY VISUAL-CORTEX; DC-STIMULATION; POLARIZING CURRENTS; SYNAPTIC PLASTICITY; BRAIN POLARIZATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS; CEREBRAL-CORTEX; ELECTRIC-FIELD; CYCLIC-AMP;
D O I
10.3389/fnins.2018.00319
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is increasingly used in both research and therapeutic settings, but its precise mechanisms remain largely unknown. At a neuronal level, tDCS modulates cortical excitability by shifting the resting membrane potential in a polarity-dependent way: anodal stimulation increases the spontaneous firing rate, while cathodal decreases it. However, the neurophysiological underpinnings of anodal/cathodal tDCS seem to be different, as well as their behavioral effect, in particular when high order areas are involved, compared to when motor or sensory brain areas are targeted. Previously, we investigated the effect of anodal tDCS on cortical excitability, by means of a combination of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Electroencephalography (EEG). Results showed a diffuse rise of cortical excitability in a bilateral fronto-parietal network. In the present study, we tested, with the same paradigm, the effect of cathodal tDCS. Single pulse TMS was delivered over the left posterior parietal cortex (PPC), before, during, and after 10 min of cathodal or share tDCS over the right PPC, while recording HD-EEG. Indexes of global and local cortical excitability were obtained both at sensors and cortical sources level. At sensors, global and local mean field power (GMFP and LMFP) were computed for three temporal windows (0-50, 50-100, and 100-150 ms), on all channels (GMFP), and in four different clusters of electrodes (LMFP, left and right, in frontal and parietal regions). After source reconstruction, Significant Current Density was computed at the global level, and for four Broadmann's areas (left/right BA 6 and 7). Both sensors and cortical sources results converge in showing no differences during and after cathodal tDCS compared to pre-stimulation sessions, both at global and local level. The same holds for sham tDCS. These data highlight an asymmetric impact of anodal and cathodal stimulation on cortical excitability, with a diffuse effect of anodal and no effect of cathodal tDCS over the parietal cortex. These results are consistent with the current literature: while anodal-excitatory and cathodal-inhibitory effects are well-established in the sensory and motor domains, both at physiological and behavioral levels, results for cathodal stimulation are more controversial for modulation of exitability of higher order areas.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]   Visual evoked potentials modulation during direct current cortical polarization [J].
Accornero, Neri ;
Voti, Pietro Li ;
La Riccia, Maurizio ;
Gregori, Bruno .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2007, 178 (02) :261-266
[2]   Polarity-specific effects of motor transcranial direct current stimulation on MARI resting state networks [J].
Amadi, Ugwechi ;
Ilie, Andrei ;
Johansen-Berg, Heidi ;
Stagg, Charlotte Jane .
NEUROIMAGE, 2014, 88 :155-161
[3]   Excitability changes induced in the human primary visual cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation: Direct electrophysiological evidence [J].
Antal, A ;
Kincses, TZ ;
Nitsche, MA ;
Bartfai, O ;
Paulus, W .
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2004, 45 (02) :702-707
[4]   Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items [J].
Baayen, R. H. ;
Davidson, D. J. ;
Bates, D. M. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2008, 59 (04) :390-412
[5]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[6]   Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans [J].
Batsikadze, G. ;
Moliadze, V. ;
Paulus, W. ;
Kuo, M. -F. ;
Nitsche, M. A. .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2013, 591 (07) :1987-2000
[7]  
Baudewig J, 2001, MAGN RESON MED, V45, P196, DOI 10.1002/1522-2594(200102)45:2<196::AID-MRM1026>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-1
[9]   A FAST METHOD FOR FORWARD COMPUTATION OF MULTIPLE-SHELL SPHERICAL HEAD MODELS [J].
BERG, P ;
SCHERG, M .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 90 (01) :58-64
[10]   Effects of uniform extracellular DC electric fields on excitability in rat hippocampal slices in vitro [J].
Bikson, M ;
Inoue, M ;
Akiyama, H ;
Deans, JK ;
Fox, JE ;
Miyakawa, H ;
Jefferys, JGR .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2004, 557 (01) :175-190