Antelope bitterbrush flowering, survival, and regeneration following ponderosa pine forest restoration treatments

被引:0
|
作者
Bedunah, DJ [1 ]
Pflug, KD [1 ]
Jones, TE [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montana, Sch Forestry, Missoula, MT 59812 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
To further understanding of the dynamics of antelope bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata) recruitment in a ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) forest in western Montana, we measured bitterbrush seed viability and germination, flower numbers in 1997 and 1998, seed depredation, seedling survival between 1994 and 2002, and population changes between 1992 and 2002 on four forest restoration treatments. Treatments included a control, a shelterwood cut, a shelterwood cut followed by a low consumption burn, and a shelterwood cut followed by a high consumption burn. Bitterbrush flower numbers did not differ between treatments, but caged bitterbrush had greater flower numbers (P < 0.001) than their uncaged pairs, indicating that browsing reduced flower numbers. Seed depredation by rodents and birds caused a small reduction (P < 0.050) in seed crop in 1997. Bitterbrush seed viability and seedling survival (percent) were both high; although, the number of surviving bitterbrush seedlings averaged only 15 plants per treatment between 1994 and 2002. In the control treatment there has been a continual decline in bitterbrush numbers totaling 26 percent between 1992 and 2002; whereas, in the shelterwood cut and burn treatments bitterbrush numbers have stabilized since 1994. If bitterbrush stands are desired as a future part of this landscape, it seems clear that disturbance will be necessary. Failure to allow for disturbances that reduce forest overstory and increase mineral soil coverage may ultimately result in loss of bitterbrush from these stands.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 155
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diversity in ponderosa pine forest structure following ecological restoration treatments
    Waltz, AEM
    Fulé, PZ
    Covington, WW
    Moore, MM
    FOREST SCIENCE, 2003, 49 (06) : 885 - 900
  • [2] NATIVE PLANTS DOMINATE UNDERSTORY VEGETATION FOLLOWING PONDEROSA PINE FOREST RESTORATION TREATMENTS
    Stoddard, Michael T.
    McGlone, Christopher M.
    Fule, Peter Z.
    Laughlin, Daniel C.
    Daniels, Mark L.
    WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2011, 71 (02) : 206 - 214
  • [3] Evaluating ponderosa pine regeneration rates following ecological restoration treatments in northern Arizona, USA
    Bailey, JD
    Covington, WW
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2002, 155 (1-3) : 271 - 278
  • [4] Response of antelope bitterbrush to repeated prescribed burning in Central Oregon ponderosa pine forests
    Busse, Matt D.
    Riegel, Gregg M.
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 257 (03) : 904 - 910
  • [5] Antelope bitterbrush and Scouler's willow response to a forest restoration project
    Bedunah, DJ
    Harrington, MG
    Ayers, DM
    PROCEEDINGS : SHRUBLAND ECOTONES, 1998, (11): : 256 - 259
  • [6] Forest structure and fuels dynamics following ponderosa pine restoration treatments, White Mountains, Arizona, USA
    Roccaforte, John P.
    Huffman, David W.
    Fule, Peter Z.
    Covington, W. Wallace
    Chancellor, W. Walker
    Stoddard, Michael T.
    Crouse, Joseph E.
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 337 : 174 - 185
  • [7] Forest restoration in Southwestern Ponderosa Pine
    Lynch, DL
    Romme, WH
    Floyd, ML
    JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 2000, 98 (08) : 17 - 24
  • [8] Ponderosa Pine Forest Restoration Treatment Longevity: Implications of Regeneration on Fire Hazard
    Tinkham, Wade T.
    Hoffman, Chad M.
    Ex, Seth A.
    Battaglia, Michael A.
    Saralecos, Jarred D.
    FORESTS, 2016, 7 (07)
  • [9] Resiliency of an Interior Ponderosa Pine Forest to Bark Beetle Infestations Following Fuel-Reduction and Forest-Restoration Treatments
    Fettig, Christopher J.
    McKelvey, Stephen R.
    FORESTS, 2014, 5 (01) : 153 - 176
  • [10] Small-mammal relationships with down wood and antelope bitterbrush in ponderosa pine forests of central Oregon
    Smith, TG
    Maguire, CC
    FOREST SCIENCE, 2004, 50 (05) : 711 - 728