Research Note: US Census Same-Sex Couple Data: Adjustments to Reduce Measurement Error and Empirical Implications

被引:13
作者
DiBennardo, Rebecca [1 ]
Gates, Gary J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Sociol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Williams Inst, Sch Law, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
Demography; Measurement; Sexuality; Quantitative methods; Methodology; UNITED-STATES; GAY; FAMILIES;
D O I
10.1007/s11113-013-9289-2
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
US Census same-sex couple data represent one of the richest and most frequently used data resources for studying the LGBT population. Recently, the Census Bureau conducted an analysis of a serious measurement problem in these data, finding that as many as 40 % of same-sex couples tabulated in Census 2000 and 28 % of those tabulated in Census 2010 were likely misclassified different-sex couples (O'Connell and Feliz, Bureau of the Census, 2011). As a result, the Census Bureau released new state-level "preferred" estimates for the number of same-sex couples in these years, as well as previously unavailable information regarding the error rate of sex misclassification among different-sex married and unmarried couples by state and year. Researchers can use this information to adjust same-sex couple tabulations for geographic areas below the state level. Using these resources, this study: (1) considers in greater detail how the properties of the same-sex couple error might affect statistical inference, (2) offers a method for developing sub-state estimates of same-sex couples, and (3) demonstrates how using adjusted estimates can improve inference in analyses that rely on understanding the distribution of same-sex couples. In order to accomplish the third task, we replicate an analysis by McVeigh and Diaz (American Sociological Review 74: 891-915, 2009) that used county level Census 2000 unadjusted same-sex couple data, substitute our adjusted same-sex couple estimate, and examine the way in which this substitution affects findings. Our results demonstrate the improved accuracy of the adjusted measure and provide the formula that researchers can use to adjust the same-sex couple distribution in future analyses.
引用
收藏
页码:603 / 614
页数:12
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Allison P.D., 2009, Fixed effect regression models
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, ANN M POPULATION ASS
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual Voters Remain a Solidly Demo cratic Bloc.
  • [4] Legislating the Family: The Effect of State Family Laws on the Presence of Children in Same-Sex Households
    Baumle, Amanda K.
    Compton, D'Lane R.
    [J]. LAW & POLICY, 2011, 33 (01) : 82 - 115
  • [5] Demographics of the gay and lesbian population in the United States: Evidence from available systematic data sources
    Black, D
    Gates, G
    Sanders, S
    Taylor, L
    [J]. DEMOGRAPHY, 2000, 37 (02) : 139 - 154
  • [6] Why do gay men live in San Francisco?
    Black, D
    Gates, G
    Sanders, S
    Taylor, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2002, 51 (01) : 54 - 76
  • [7] Black D., 2007, The measurement of same-sex unmarried partner couples in the 2000 US Census
  • [8] The economics of lesbian and gay families
    Black, Dan A.
    Sanders, Seth G.
    Taylor, Lowell J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2007, 21 (02) : 53 - 70
  • [9] Carpenter C, 2008, DEMOGRAPHY, V45, P573
  • [10] Gates GaryJ., 2011, US CENSUS SNAPSHOT 2