Prediction of cardiovascular events from systolic or diastolic blood pressure

被引:2
|
作者
Talebi, Atefeh [1 ]
Mortensen, Rikke Normark [2 ]
Gerds, Thomas Alexander [3 ]
Jeppesen, Jorgen Lykke [4 ,5 ]
Torp-Pedersen, Christian [6 ]
机构
[1] Iran Univ Med Sci, Colorectal Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[2] Novo Nordisk, Nordjylland, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Biostat Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Dept Clin Med, Cardiol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Univ Copenhagen, Amager Hvidovre Hosp Glostrup, Dept Med, Glostrup, Denmark
[6] Nordsjaellands Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Hillerod, Denmark
来源
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION | 2022年 / 24卷 / 06期
关键词
Brier score; cardiovascular risk; competing risks; diastolic blood pressure; predictive value; systolic blood pressure; RISK; MORTALITY; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1111/jch.14468
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Over time, a focus on blood pressure has transferred from diastolic pressure to systolic pressure. Formal analyses of differences in predictive value are scarce. Our goal of the study was whether office SBP adds prognostic information to office DBP and whether both 24-h ambulatory SBP and 24-h ambulatory DBP is specifically important. The authors examined 2097 participants from a population cohort recruited in Copenhagen, Denmark. Cause-specific Cox regression was performed to predict 10-year person-specific absolute risks of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular (CV) events. Also, the time-dependent area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) was utilized to evaluate discriminative ability. The calibration plots of the models (Hosmer-May test) were calculated as well as the Brier score which combines (discrimination and calibration). Adding both 24-h ambulatory SBP and 24-h ambulatory diastolic blood pressure did not significantly increase AUC for CV mortality and CV events. Moreover, adding both office SBP and office DBP did not significantly improve AUC for both CV mortality and CV events. The difference in AUC (95% confidence interval; p-value) was .26% (-.2% to .73%; .27) for 10-year CV mortality and .69% (-.09% to 1.46%; .082) for 10-year risk of CV events. The difference in AUC was .12% (-.2% to .44%; .46) for 10-year CV mortality and .04% (-.35 to .42%; .85) for 10-year risk of CV events. Moreover, for both CV mortality and CV events, office SBP did not improve prognostic information to office DBP. In addition, the Brier scores of office BP in both CV mortality and CV events were .078 and .077, respectively. Furthermore, the Brier scores were .077 and .078 in CV mortality and CV events of 24-h ambulatory. For the average population as those participating in a population survey, the 10-year discriminative ability for long-term predictions of CV death and CV events is not improved by adding systolic to diastolic blood pressure. This finding is found for ambulatory as well as office blood pressure.
引用
收藏
页码:760 / 769
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure and pulse pressure for prediction of cardiovascular events and mortality in a Middle Eastern population
    Hadaegh, Farzad
    Shafiee, Gita
    Hatami, Masumeh
    Azizi, Feridoun
    BLOOD PRESSURE, 2012, 21 (01) : 12 - 18
  • [2] Office blood pressure or ambulatory blood pressure for the prediction of cardiovascular events
    Mortensen, Rikke Normark
    Gerds, Thomas Alexander
    Jeppesen, Jorgen Lykke
    Torp-Pedersen, Christian
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2017, 38 (44) : 3296 - 3304
  • [3] Effect of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure on Cardiovascular Outcomes
    Flint, Alexander C.
    Conell, Carol
    Ren, Xiushui
    Banki, Nader M.
    Chan, Sheila L.
    Rao, Vivek A.
    Melles, Ronald B.
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 381 (03): : 243 - 251
  • [4] Role of pulse pressure, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure, in the prediction of cardiovascular risk.: Cohort study
    Miguel Baena-Diez, Jose
    Bermudez-Chillida, Noemi
    Garcia-Lareo, Manel
    Olivia Byram, Alice
    Vidal-Solsona, Marc
    Vilato-Garcia, Monica
    Gomez-Fernandez, Claudia
    Ernesto Vasquez-Lazo, Javier
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 2008, 130 (10): : 361 - 365
  • [5] Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure, Incident Cardiovascular Events, and Death in Elderly Persons The Role of Functional Limitation in the Cardiovascular Health Study
    Peralta, Carmen A.
    Katz, Ronit
    Newman, Anne B.
    Psaty, Bruce M.
    Odden, Michelle C.
    HYPERTENSION, 2014, 64 (03) : 472 - 480
  • [6] Association of diastolic blood pressure with cardiovascular events in older people varies upon cardiovascular history
    Wijsman, Liselotte W.
    Muller, Majon
    de Craen, Anton J. M.
    Jukema, J. Wouter
    Westendorp, Rudi G. J.
    Mooijaart, Simon P.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2018, 36 (04) : 773 - 778
  • [7] Real-World Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Levels and Cardiovascular Mortality in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes-Results From a Large Registry Cohort in Asia
    Seng, Loraine Liping
    Kiat, Troy Puar Hai
    Bee, Yong Mong
    Jafar, Tazeen H.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2023, 12 (23):
  • [8] Association between cardiovascular risk and diastolic blood pressure in older adults with systolic blood pressure less than 130mmHg: a prospective cohort study from 2014 to 2022
    Hou, Jingjing
    Zhao, Song
    Liu, Jie
    Xi, Xiaoxia
    Xu, Yawei
    Shi, Shengfeng
    Yu, Shikai
    Zhang, Yi
    AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2024, 36 (01)
  • [9] The value of earlier-in-life systolic and diastolic blood pressure for cardiovascular risk
    Leiherer, Andreas
    Brozek, Wolfgang
    Muendlein, Axel
    Ulmer, Hanno
    Saely, Christoph H.
    Fraunberger, Peter
    Nagel, Gabriele
    Zitt, Emanuel
    Drexel, Heinz
    Concin, Hans
    ISCIENCE, 2024, 27 (03)
  • [10] PREDICTIVE EFFECT OF 24H SYSTOLIC AND DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE VARIABILITY ON CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS IN ELDERLY HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS
    Ma, Shuhong
    Li, Ying
    Lin, Lisha
    Zhang, Xiaoxia
    Wang, Erning
    ACTA MEDICA MEDITERRANEA, 2022, 38 (03): : 1697 - 1701