Adjustable loop ACL suspension devices demonstrate less reliability in terms of reproducibility and irreversible displacement

被引:28
作者
Ahmad, Sufian S. [1 ,4 ]
Hirschmann, Michael T. [2 ]
Voumard, Benjamin [3 ]
Kohl, Sandro [1 ]
Zysset, Philippe [3 ]
Mukabeta, Takura [4 ]
Evangelopoulos, Dimitrios S. [1 ]
Ateschrang, Atesch [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Berne, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Traumatol, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
[2] Kantonsspital Baselland Bruderholz Liestal Laufen, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Traumatol, Bruderholz, Switzerland
[3] Univ Bern, ISTB, Bern, Switzerland
[4] Univ Cape Town, Groote Schuur Univ Hosp Cape Town, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Traumatol, Cape Town, South Africa
[5] Eberhard Karls Univ Tubingen, Dept Traumatol & Reconstruct Surg, BG Trauma Ctr Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany
关键词
ACL reconstruction; ACL repair; Irreversible displacement; Fixed button; Adjustable button; ENDOBUTTON lozenge CL ULTRA; RetroButton; RIGIDLOOP; GraftMax (TM); RIGIDLOOP (TM) Adjustable; ACL TightRope (R); Ultrabutton(lozenge); ToggleLoc (TM); ProCinch (TM); Femoral cortical suspension device; CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-017-4769-2
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to perform a comprehensive biomechanical examination of frequently applied femoral cortical suspension devices, comparing the properties of both fixed and adjustable fixation mechanisms. It was hypothesized that adjustable loop devices demonstrate less consistent fixation properties with increased variability compared to fixed loop devices. Nine frequently applied fixation button types were tested, six adjustable and three rigid loop devices. Six samples of each device type were purchased. Each device was installed in a servo-hydraulic mechanical testing machine, running a 2000 cycle loading protocol at force increments between 50 and 500 N. Irreversible displacement in mm was measured for all of the tested samples of each implant. Ultimately, maximum load to failure was applied and measured in Nm. An irreversible displacement of 3 mm was considered failure of the implant. Three of the six adjustable devices (GraftMax (TM), TightRopeA (R) ToggleLoc (TM)) demonstrated a median displacement above the threshold of clinical failure before completion of the cycles. All adjustable loop devices showed a wide intragroup variation in terms of irreversible displacement, compared to fixed-loop devices. Fixed-loop devices provided consistent reproducible results with narrow ranges and significantly lower irreversible displacement (p < 0.05), the maximum being 1.4 mm. All devices withstood an ultimate force of more than 500 N. Adjustable loop devices still show biomechanical inferiority and demonstrate heterogeneity of fixation properties with wide- and less-reproducible displacement ranges resultant to the mechanism of adjustment, denoting less reliability. However, three adjustable devices (RIGIDLOOP (TM) Adjustable, Ultrabutton (auS), ProCinch (TM)) demonstrate fixation capacities within the margins of clinical acceptance. RIGIDLOOP (TM) Adjustable provides the most comparable fixation properties to fixed loop devices.
引用
收藏
页码:1392 / 1398
页数:7
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Outcome measures in clinical ACL studies: an analysis of highly cited level I trials [J].
Ahmad, Sufian S. ;
Meyer, Johannes C. ;
Krismer, Anna M. ;
Ahmad, Suhaib S. ;
Evangelopoulos, Dimitrios S. ;
Hoppe, Sven ;
Kohl, Sandro .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2017, 25 (05) :1517-1527
[2]   The Hundred Most-Cited Publications in Orthopaedic Knee Research [J].
Ahmad, Sufian S. ;
Evangelopoulos, Dimitrios S. ;
Abbasian, M. ;
Roeder, Christoph ;
Kohl, Sandro .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2014, 96A (22)
[3]   Femoral Suspension Devices for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Do Adjustable Loops Lengthen? [J].
Barrow, Aaron E. ;
Pilia, Marcello ;
Guda, Teja ;
Kadrmas, Warren R. ;
Burns, Travis C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (02) :343-349
[4]   Does adjustable-loop femoral cortical suspension loosen after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A retrospective comparative study [J].
Boyle, Matthew J. ;
Vovos, Tyler J. ;
Walker, Cameron G. ;
Stabile, Kathryne J. ;
Roth, Jonathan M. ;
Garrett, William E., Jr. .
KNEE, 2015, 22 (04) :304-308
[5]   An international survey on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practices [J].
Chechik, Ofir ;
Amar, Eyal ;
Khashan, Morsi ;
Lador, Ran ;
Eyal, Gil ;
Gold, Aviram .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 37 (02) :201-206
[6]   Mechanical properties of suspensory fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison of the fixed-length loop device versus the adjustable-length loop device [J].
Eguchi, Akio ;
Ochi, Mitsuo ;
Adachi, Nobuo ;
Deie, Masataka ;
Nakamae, Atsuo ;
Usman, Muhammad Andry .
KNEE, 2014, 21 (03) :743-748
[7]   A Biomechanical Comparison of Femoral Cortical Suspension Devices for Soft Tissue Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Under High Loads [J].
Johnson, Jared S. ;
Smith, Sean D. ;
LaPrade, Christopher M. ;
Turnbull, Travis Lee ;
LaPrade, Robert F. ;
Wijdicks, Coen A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2015, 43 (01) :154-160
[8]   A novel technique, dynamic intraligamentary stabilization creates optimal conditions for primary ACL healing: A preliminary biomechanical study [J].
Kohl, Sandro ;
Evangelopoulos, Dimitrios S. ;
Ahmad, Sufian S. ;
Kohlhof, Heindrik ;
Herrmann, Gudrun ;
Bonel, Harald ;
Eggli, Stefan .
KNEE, 2014, 21 (02) :477-480
[9]  
Pasquali M, 2015, KNEE SURG SPORT TR A, DOI [10.1007/s00167-015-3711-81-4, DOI 10.1007/S00167-015-3711-81-4]
[10]   Femoral Cortical Suspension Devices for Soft Tissue Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction A Comparative Biomechanical Study [J].
Petre, Benjamin M. ;
Smith, Sean D. ;
Jansson, Kyle S. ;
de Meijer, Peter-Paul ;
Hackett, Thomas R. ;
LaPrade, Robert F. ;
Wijdicks, Coen A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (02) :416-422