THE UNITY OF NON-TERRITORIALITY IN OUTER SPACE VERSUS THE DIVERSITY OF TERRITORIALITY IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: A RECONCILIATION REGIME FOR SUSTAINABLE SPACE COMMERCIALISATION

被引:0
作者
Chen, Zhijie [1 ]
机构
[1] Jinan Univ, Sch Humanities, Dept Law, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
来源
HONG KONG LAW JOURNAL | 2022年 / 52卷
关键词
NONAPPROPRIATION PRINCIPLE; COOPERATION; PROTECTION; MECHANISM; LAW;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The commercial and sustainable development of outer space requires a proper intellectual property protection legal regime. The international intellectual property treaties have not explicitly considered intellectual property protection in outer space in their provisions. Likewise, none of the five outer space treaties' provisions address the issue of intellectual property protection. This may discourage states and non-governmental entities from actively engaging in space activities. One principal reason leading to this legal status is the potential conflict caused by the unity of non-territoriality in outer space and the diversity of territoriality in intellectual property. This article will firstly examine in detail the contrasting feature of territoriality between the legal regimes of outer space and intellectual property. It then moves to argue that art VIII of the Outer Space Treaty offers a regulatory approach to reconcile the conflict. There is a self-contained mechanism that uses registered space objects as a connecting factor and the mode of "quasi-territorial" jurisdiction in public international law to permit the legitimate extension of the national sovereignty of the state of registry to space objects, thereby enabling guaranteed levels of functional intellectual property rights in outer space. An optimum balance can be reached between the unity of non-territoriality in outer space and the diversity of territoriality in intellectual property. As a result, intellectual property rights created from space activities can be legally protected by extending existing intellectual property laws to space objects, which has been well demonstrated in certain spacefaring countries' national space legislation. There is also a need to consider the legal harmonisation of rules concerning intellectual property protection in outer space at the international level in the long run.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 181
页数:25
相关论文
共 77 条
[21]  
Brownlie Ian, 2003, PRINCIPLES PUBLIC IN, V6th, P298
[22]  
Chen ZJ, 2020, HONG KONG LAW J, V50, P195
[23]   Theoretical Territoriality Paradox for the Intellectual Property Protection in Outer Space and Its Regulatory Approach for Reconciliation [J].
Chen, Zhijie .
JOURNAL OF EAST ASIA AND INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2020, 13 (01) :53-74
[24]   The Sustainable Commercialisation of Space: The Case for a Voluntary Code of Conduct for the Space Industry [J].
Chrysaki, Margarita .
SPACE POLICY, 2020, 52
[25]  
DeBari, 1992, Fordham Int'l LJ, V16, P687
[26]   A rightly balanced intellectual property rights regime as a mechanism to enhance commercial earth observation activities [J].
Doldirina, Catherine .
ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2010, 67 (5-6) :639-647
[27]   Thinking strategically about intellectual property rights [J].
Drahos, P .
TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY, 1997, 21 (03) :201-211
[28]  
Duffy JohnF., 2002, BERKELEY TECHNOLOGY, V17, P685
[29]  
Freeland Steven, 2009, Cologne Commentary on Space Law: Volume 1, Outer Space Treaty, V1, P44
[30]  
Gunter BC, 2019, AEROSPACE AM, V57, P22