DEVELOPING A SELF-EFFICACY SCALE TOWARD PHYSICS SUBJECTS FOR LOWER-SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS

被引:4
作者
Fidan, Mustafa [1 ]
Tuncel, Meric [2 ]
机构
[1] Bartin Univ, Fac Educ, Dept Educ Sci, TR-74100 Bartin, Turkey
[2] Abant Izzet Baysal Univ, Fac Educ, Dept Educ Sci, TR-14280 Bolu, Turkey
来源
JOURNAL OF BALTIC SCIENCE EDUCATION | 2021年 / 20卷 / 01期
关键词
lower-secondary school; physics subjects; scale development; self-efficacy belief; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION; MOTIVATION;
D O I
10.33225/jbse/21.20.38
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Physics subjects or topics as a part of science education enable students to explore nature and natural events by using physics laws and scientific methods. In the lower-secondary school, physics is a subfield within the science curriculum developed holistically with the broad field curriculum design unlike the subject-centred curriculum in the upper-secondary education. As an important factor that directs the achievement, self-efficacy is one of the predecessors of these cognitive and affective skills. Accordingly, most of the scales which evaluate the students' cognitive or affective skills in the lower-secondary school are related to science course in a general context. This research aimed to develop a valid and reliable scale measuring the students' self-efficacy beliefs toward physics subjects for lower-secondary schools. The sample consists of 2737 students. The draft scale consisted of 52 items and was applied to 1882 students in the first stage. To construct validity of the scale, exploratory factor analysis was performed. The results showed that the scale consisted of single-factor with 28 items. To confirm its factor structure, the scale was applied to 785 students. The research findings indicate that the scale is a valid and reliable instrument to measure the self-efficacy beliefs towards physics subjects.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 49
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Alpaslan M., 2016, MUSTAFA KEMAL U J SO, V13, P111
[2]  
Anderson L.W., 1988, Educational Research, Methodology and Measurement: an International Handbook, P421
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, THESIS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, APPL MULTIVARIATE ST
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, TECHN REP, DOI [10.1126/science.1218231, DOI 10.1787/9789264281820-EN]
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2016, METHODOLOGY SOCIAL S
[7]  
Aslam S., 2017, European Journal of Education Studies, V3, P85, DOI [10.5281/zenodo.1050292, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.1050292]
[8]  
Aypay A., 2010, Inonu Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, V11, P113
[9]   Critical Values for Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio: Revisiting the Original Methods of Calculation [J].
Ayre, Colin ;
Scally, Andrew John .
MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION IN COUNSELING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 47 (01) :79-86
[10]  
B?y?k?zt?rk S, 2018, MANUAL DATA ANAL SOC