Environmental responsibility versus taxation

被引:18
|
作者
Bazin, D
Ballet, J
Touahri, D
机构
[1] Univ Versailles, Ctr Econ & Eth Environm & Dev, C3ED UVSQ, F-78047 Guyancourt, France
[2] Univ Aix Marseille 2, F-13284 Marseille 07, France
关键词
taxation; responsibility; crowding-out effect;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.03.015
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Taxation, as a tool of environmental economic policy, traditionally aims at generating a discouraging effect upon both the consumer and producer. Environmental degradation should finally stabilize itself. The mechanism of taxation replies to a behavioural stimulus (taxes versus subsidies). Recent economic analyses have not aimed at focusing their studies concerning the very responsibility of economic actors on anything else other than the mechanism of taxation. Taxes thus imply responsible behaviour. We shall attempt to highlight that responsibility could be defined independently from taxation and that the affirmation of responsibility is inversed to taxation. Technically speaking, we shall demonstrate that the taxation extolled by the legislator induces a certain crowding out effect as regards to responsibility. In the first part of this article we shall therefore insist that economic policies in terms of taxation drive away the sentiment of individual responsibility. We shall reason in terms of production and consumption to demonstrate this fact. Finally, we shall insist that a high degree of responsibility could substitute taxation. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 134
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] FINANCIAL ASPECTS OF SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY OF BUSINESS
    Putintsev, Anatolii
    Klymenko, Oksana
    Mala, Svitlana
    Horlach, Alla
    Petrukha, Nina
    Kovtun, Mykyta
    AD ALTA-JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH, 2022, 12 (02): : 49 - 56
  • [22] Introduction to the Special Issue on Individual Environmental Responsibility
    Lieske Voget-Kleschin
    Christian Baatz
    Laura Garcia-Portela
    Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 2019, 32 : 493 - 504
  • [23] Introduction to the Special Issue on Individual Environmental Responsibility
    Voget-Kleschin, Lieske
    Baatz, Christian
    Garcia-Portela, Laura
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 2019, 32 (04) : 493 - 504
  • [24] The Impact and Determinants of Environmental Taxation on Economic Growth Communities in Romania
    Andrei, Jean
    Mieila, Mihai
    Popescu, Gheorghe H.
    Nica, Elvira
    Cristina, Manole
    ENERGIES, 2016, 9 (11)
  • [25] Environmental responsibility accounting in complex energy systems
    Khajehpour, Hossein
    Saboohi, Yadollah
    Tsatsaronis, George
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 166 : 998 - 1009
  • [26] Environmental responsibility: millennial values and cultural dimensions
    Hanson-Rasmussen, Nancy J.
    Lauver, Kristy J.
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL RESPONSIBILITY, 2018, 9 (01) : 6 - 20
  • [27] Environmental taxes when firms care about environmental corporate social responsibility
    Barcena-Ruiz, Juan Carlos
    Sagasta, Amagoia
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2024, 96
  • [28] ENVIRONMENTAL DISCLOSURES IN THE MANAGEMENT REPORT: TRANSPARENCY, RESPONSIBILITY AND COMMUNICATION
    Syrotenko, Nataliia
    Pravdiuk, Nataliia
    Slobodyanik, Yulia
    Holovatska, Svitlana
    Skrypko, Tetyana
    INDEPENDENT JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & PRODUCTION, 2021, 12 (03): : S187 - S204
  • [29] Cooperation in a Dynamic Setting with Asymmetric Environmental Valuation and Responsibility
    Cabo, Francisco
    Tidball, Mabel
    DYNAMIC GAMES AND APPLICATIONS, 2022, 12 (03) : 844 - 871
  • [30] Ecological Behavior, Environmental Attitude, and Feelings of Responsibility for the Environment
    Kaiser, Florian G.
    Ranney, Michael
    Hartig, Terry
    Bowler, Peter A.
    EUROPEAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1999, 4 (02) : 59 - 74