The HEDQUAL scale: A new measurement scale of service quality for MBA programs in higher education

被引:21
|
作者
Icli, G. E. [1 ]
Anil, N. K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kirklareli Univ, FEAS, Kirklareli, Turkey
关键词
CONSUMER PERCEPTIONS; SE PROCEDURE; SATISFACTION; CONSTRUCT; LOYALTY;
D O I
10.4102/sajbm.v45i3.129
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
HEdPERF is the most developed scale in the literature to measure service quality in higher education. However, HEdPERF is designed to measure service quality at university level (macro level) as a generic measurement instrument. Students' expectations regarding education show differences as levels of education at universities (MBA, PhD) vary. Thus, in order to measure the quality of education at different levels, a new scale is required to meet the needs of that particular level (MBA). The purpose of this study was to develop and validate HEDQUAL, a new measurement scale of service quality specifically designed for MBA programs in the higher education sector. A 36 item (Turkish) questionnaire on service quality in higher education was developed and tested for unidimensionality, reliability and validity using both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. A total of 317 usable questionnaires were collected with a return rate of 42%. SPSS 15 and LISREL 8 were used and exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were applied. The recommended goodness-of-fit indices of the model were found to be within tolerable ranges, suggesting that the model provides a close fit to the data. The study identified five factors namely academic quality, administrative service quality, library services quality, quality of providing career opportunities, and supporting services quality as the key dimensions of service quality. This paper uses existing literature on services quality and MBA students' expectations and needs, and develops an instrument that provides insights into measuring service quality for MBA students in a university.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 43
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Management of Service Quality of Higher Education
    Yan, Sun
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, VOLS I AND II, 2010, : 96 - 99
  • [42] Assessing service quality in higher education
    Rusu, B.
    Oniciuc, N.
    QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 295 - 302
  • [43] Assessing service quality in Higher Education
    Rusu, B.
    Oniciuc, N.
    3rd Balkan Region Conference on Engineering Education, Conference Proceedings: ADVANCING ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2005, : 81 - 84
  • [44] Reviewing Service Quality in Higher Education
    Farjam, Sanaz
    Xu Hongyi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, : 1020 - 1029
  • [45] Evaluating service user pedagogy in UK higher education: Validating the Huddersfield Service User Pedagogy Scale
    Tobbell, Jane
    Boduszek, Daniel
    Kola-Palmer, Susanna
    Vaughan, Joanne
    Hargreaves, Janet
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2018, 63 : 81 - 86
  • [46] New insights into the measurement model of a new scale for evaluating restaurant service quality during major infectious disease outbreaks
    Chang, Ya-Yuan
    Cheng, Ching-Chan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2022, 34 (05) : 1629 - 1648
  • [47] Programs for the improvement of the quality of teaching in higher education
    Winteler, A
    Krapp, A
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PADAGOGIK, 1999, 45 (01): : 45 - 60
  • [48] On the optimal quality of domestic higher education programs
    Lien, D
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2006, 23 (02) : 265 - 275
  • [49] The science of higher education: state higher education policy and the laws of scale
    Sudirman, Sudirman
    Effendi, Vienntiny Safrilianti
    Sariyah, Sariyah
    JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 46 (02) : 234 - 236
  • [50] Evaluation of service quality in higher education: A New Zealand employers' perspective
    Joseph, B
    Joseph, M
    Ford, JB
    1996 AMA EDUCATORS' PROCEEDINGS, VOL 7 - ENHANCING KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT IN MARKETING, 1996, 7 : 316 - 317