SAMPL7 Host-Guest Challenge Overview: assessing the reliability of polarizable and non-polarizable methods for binding free energy calculations

被引:52
作者
Amezcua, Martin [1 ]
El Khoury, Lea [1 ]
Mobley, David L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Pharmaceut Sci, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Chem, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
关键词
Host– guest binding; Free energy; Binding affinity; SAMPL; Blind challenge; OctaAcid; Cyclodextrin; Cucurbituril; PROTEIN-LIGAND POSES; FORCE-FIELD; BLIND PREDICTION; COMPUTER-SIMULATIONS; AFFINITY RANKINGS; DRUG DISCOVERY; WATER; ACCURATE; CYCLODEXTRIN; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s10822-020-00363-5
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The SAMPL challenges focus on testing and driving progress of computational methods to help guide pharmaceutical drug discovery. However, assessment of methods for predicting binding affinities is often hampered by computational challenges such as conformational sampling, protonation state uncertainties, variation in test sets selected, and even lack of high quality experimental data. SAMPL blind challenges have thus frequently included a component focusing on host-guest binding, which removes some of these challenges while still focusing on molecular recognition. Here, we report on the results of the SAMPL7 blind prediction challenge for host-guest affinity prediction. In this study, we focused on three different host-guest categories-a familiar deep cavity cavitand series which has been featured in several prior challenges (where we examine binding of a series of guests to two hosts), a new series of cyclodextrin derivatives which are monofunctionalized around the rim to add amino acid-like functionality (where we examine binding of two guests to a series of hosts), and binding of a series of guests to a new acyclic TrimerTrip host which is related to previous cucurbituril hosts. Many predictions used methods based on molecular simulations, and overall success was mixed, though several methods stood out. As in SAMPL6, we find that one strategy for achieving reasonable accuracy here was to make empirical corrections to binding predictions based on previous data for host categories which have been studied well before, though this can be of limited value when new systems are included. Additionally, we found that alchemical free energy methods using the AMOEBA polarizable force field had considerable success for the two host categories in which they participated. The new TrimerTrip system was also found to introduce some sampling problems, because multiple conformations may be relevant to binding and interconvert only slowly. Overall, results in this challenge tentatively suggest that further investigation of polarizable force fields for these challenges may be warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 35
页数:35
相关论文
共 97 条
  • [91] Identifying ligand binding sites and poses using GPU-accelerated Hamiltonian replica exchange molecular dynamics
    Wang, Kai
    Chodera, John D.
    Yang, Yanzhi
    Shirts, Michael R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2013, 27 (12) : 989 - 1007
  • [92] Accurate and Reliable Prediction of Relative Ligand Binding Potency in Prospective Drug Discovery by Way of a Modern Free-Energy Calculation Protocol and Force Field
    Wang, Lingle
    Wu, Yujie
    Deng, Yuqing
    Kim, Byungchan
    Pierce, Levi
    Krilov, Goran
    Lupyan, Dmitry
    Robinson, Shaughnessy
    Dahlgren, Markus K.
    Greenwood, Jeremy
    Romero, Donna L.
    Masse, Craig
    Knight, Jennifer L.
    Steinbrecher, Thomas
    Beuming, Thijs
    Damm, Wolfgang
    Harder, Ed
    Sherman, Woody
    Brewer, Mark
    Wester, Ron
    Murcko, Mark
    Frye, Leah
    Farid, Ramy
    Lin, Teng
    Mobley, David L.
    Jorgensen, William L.
    Berne, Bruce J.
    Friesner, Richard A.
    Abel, Robert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 137 (07) : 2695 - 2703
  • [94] Bind3P: Optimization of a Water Model Based on Host-Guest Binding Data
    Yin, Jian
    Henriksen, Niel M.
    Muddana, Hari S.
    Gilson, Michael K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2018, 14 (07) : 3621 - 3632
  • [95] Overview of the SAMPL5 host-guest challenge: Are we doing better?
    Yin, Jian
    Henriksen, Niel M.
    Slochower, David R.
    Shirts, Michael R.
    Chiu, Michael W.
    Mobley, David L.
    Gilson, Michael K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2017, 31 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [96] Polarizable Multipole-Based Force Field for Dimethyl and Trimethyl Phosphate
    Zhang, Changsheng
    Lu, Chao
    Wang, Qiantao
    Ponder, Jay W.
    Ren, Pengyu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2015, 11 (11) : 5326 - 5339
  • [97] Benchmarking Electronic Structure Methods for Accurate Fixed-Charge Electrostatic Models
    Zhou, Alex
    Schauperl, Michael
    Nerenberg, Paul S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2020, 60 (01) : 249 - 258