Impact of diatomaceous biofilms on the frictional drag of fouling-release coatings

被引:114
作者
Schultz, M. P. [1 ]
Walker, J. M. [2 ]
Steppe, C. N. [3 ]
Flack, K. A. [4 ]
机构
[1] US Naval Acad, Dept Naval Architecture & Ocean Engn, Annapolis, MD 21402 USA
[2] Univ Tasmania, Natl Ctr Maritime Engn & Hydrodynam, Australian Maritime Coll, Launceston, Tas 7250, Australia
[3] US Naval Acad, Dept Oceanog, Annapolis, MD 21402 USA
[4] US Naval Acad, Dept Mech Engn, Annapolis, MD 21402 USA
关键词
drag; powering; biofilms; biofouling; roughness; fouling-release coatings; TURBULENT-BOUNDARY-LAYER; ANTIFOULING COATINGS; SURFACE-ROUGHNESS; DIATOMS; RESISTANCE; SETTLEMENT; ADHESION; SMOOTH;
D O I
10.1080/08927014.2015.1108407
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Skin-friction results are presented for fouling-release (FR) hull coatings in the unexposed, clean condition and after dynamic exposure to diatomaceous biofilms for 3 and 6 months. The experiments were conducted in a fully developed turbulent channel flow facility spanning a wide Reynolds number range. The results show that the clean FR coatings tested were hydraulically smooth over much of the Reynolds number range. Biofilms, however, resulted in an increase in skin-friction of up to 70%. The roughness functions for the biofilm-covered surfaces did not display universal behavior, but instead varied with the percentage coverage by the biofilm. The effect of the biofilm was observed to scale with its mean thickness and the square root of the percentage coverage. A new effective roughness length scale (k(eff)) for biofilms based on these parameters is proposed. Boundary layer similarity-law scaling is used to predict the impact of these biofilms on the required shaft power for a mid-sized naval surface combatant at cruising speed. The increase in power is estimated to be between 1.5% and 10.1% depending on the biofilm thickness and percentage coverage.
引用
收藏
页码:759 / 773
页数:15
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   RESPONSE OF A TURBULENT BOUNDARY LAYER TO A STEP CHANGE IN SURFACE ROUGHNESS .1. SMOOTH TO ROUGH [J].
ANTONIA, RA ;
LUXTON, RE .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1971, 48 (AUG27) :721-&
[2]  
Benson J., 1938, CS1913 NACA C R
[3]   A note on "critical roughness height" and "transitional roughness" [J].
Bradshaw, P .
PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2000, 12 (06) :1611-1614
[4]   FOULING ALGAE FROM IN-SERVICE SHIPS [J].
CALLOW, ME .
BOTANICA MARINA, 1986, 29 (04) :351-357
[5]   The measurement of the drag characteristics of tin-free self-polishing co-polymers and fouling release coatings using a rotor apparatus [J].
Candries, M ;
Atlar, M ;
Mesbahi, E ;
Pazouki, K .
BIOFOULING, 2003, 19 :27-36
[6]   The development of microfouling on four commercial antifouling coatings under static and dynamic immersion [J].
Cassé, F ;
Swain, GW .
INTERNATIONAL BIODETERIORATION & BIODEGRADATION, 2006, 57 (03) :179-185
[7]   ENGINEERING APPLICATION OF EXPERIMENTAL UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS [J].
COLEMAN, HW ;
STEELE, WG .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1995, 33 (10) :1888-1896
[8]   Velocity-defect scaling for turbulent boundary layers with a range of relative roughness [J].
Connelly, JS ;
Schultz, MP ;
Flack, KA .
EXPERIMENTS IN FLUIDS, 2006, 40 (02) :188-195
[9]  
Finnie AA., 2010, BIOFOULING, P185, DOI [DOI 10.1002/9781444315462.CH13, 10.1002/9781444315462, DOI 10.1002/9781444315462]
[10]  
Granville P.S., 1958, Journal of Ship Research, V2, P52, DOI DOI 10.5957/JSR.1958.2.4.52