Toward a general logicist methodology for engineering ethically correct robots

被引:102
作者
Bringsjord, Selmer [1 ]
Arkoudas, Konstantine
Bello, Paul
机构
[1] Rensselaer Polytech Inst, Dept Cognit Sci, Troy, NY 12180 USA
[2] Rensselaer Polytech Inst, Dept Comp Sci, Troy, NY 12180 USA
关键词
(Edited Abstract);
D O I
10.1109/MIS.2006.82
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
A general deontic logistic methodology that formalizes moral code allows ethicists to render theories and dilemmas in declarative form for analysis and to engineer ethically correct robots. This methodology is aiming to meet the challenge of ensuring that robot behavior conforms to more general conditions. The method maximizes the probability that a robot behaves in a certifiably ethical fashion in a complex environment that demands such behavior if humans are to be secured. Every meaningful action that the robot performs must access a proof that the action is at least permissible for certifying a behavior to be ethical. A metatheoritical component constitutes a proof theory describing precisely how and when a set of formulas can prove another formula. The logistic methodology allows robots to consult with humans and give humans the power to oversee a robot's reasoning in deliberating about the ethical status of prospective actions.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 44
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1980, Modal Logic: An Introduction, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511621192
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, LANGUAGE PROOF LOGIC
[3]  
Arkoudas K, 2004, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V3487, P111
[4]  
Arkoudas K., 2005, AAAI FALL S
[5]  
Asimov I, 2004, I ROBOT
[6]  
Bringsjord S, 1998, MIND MACH, V8, P313, DOI 10.1023/A:1008215627632
[7]   Logic and Artificial Intelligence: Divorced, Still Married, Separated ...? [J].
David A. Selmer Bringsjord .
Minds and Machines, 1998, 8 (2) :273-308
[8]  
Chisholm Roderick., 1963, Analysis, V24, P33, DOI [DOI 10.1093/ANALYS/24.2.33, 10.2307/3327064]
[9]  
DAVIS M, 2000, ENG LOGIC MATH ORIGI
[10]  
FELDMAN F, 1998, INTRO ETHICS