Determinants of US foreign policy in multilateral development banks: The place of human rights

被引:8
作者
Braaten, Daniel B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas Lutheran Univ, Dept Sociol Polit Sci & Geog, Seguin, TX 78155 USA
关键词
human rights; multilateral development banks; US foreign policy; UNITED-NATIONS; AID ALLOCATION; POLITICS; STATES; ORGANIZATIONS;
D O I
10.1177/0022343314524219
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to identify and explain recent US human rights policy in the Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs). Foreign aid, whether distributed directly (bilateral aid) or indirectly through multilateral institutions such as the MDBs, is one of several tools through which the USA furthers its human rights policy. Several studies show the conflicted human rights policies the USA pursues with bilateral aid, but very few examine the role of human rights in US multilateral aid policy. It is this deficit that the present study addresses by examining what factors determine how the USA votes on proposals before the Executive Board in the various MDBs. Using a multinomial logistic regression model I test whether US votes in the MDBs are conditioned on recipient countries' respect for human rights along with other strategic interest variables. The study finds that respect for political rights has an important role in determining US votes in the MDBs although much of the impact is accounted for by votes specifically against China. Conversely, respect for rights of personal integrity do not have an impact on US voting. Level of economic development and whether the country receives military aid from the USA are also important determinants of US votes, as well as the level of trade between the USA and the recipient country.
引用
收藏
页码:515 / 527
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   The Whitlam government and the Republic of Korea: responding to human rights challenges in foreign policy [J].
Robb, Kevin S. .
INTERNATIONAL HISTORY REVIEW, 2023, 45 (02) :372-390
[32]   Reason over passion: Pierre Trudeau, human rights, and Canadian foreign policy [J].
McKercher, Asa .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2018, 73 (01) :129-145
[33]   Human Rights in Scottish Foreign Policy: Constructing Scotland as Good Global Citizen [J].
Mills, Kurt ;
Birdsall, Andrea .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN RIGHTS PRACTICE, 2024, 16 (03) :915-933
[34]   China's human rights foreign policy in the Xi Jinping era: Normative revisionism shrouded in discursive moderation [J].
Chen, Titus C. ;
Hsu, Chiahao .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICS & INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 2021, 23 (02) :228-247
[35]   The Weaponization of Human Rights in US-China Trade Policy: Impacts and Risks [J].
Slawotsky, Joel .
JOURNAL OF WORLD TRADE, 2022, JUL (04) :547-570
[36]   The organized hypocrisy of ethical foreign policy: Human rights, democracy and Western arms sales [J].
Perkins, Richard ;
Neumayer, Eric .
GEOFORUM, 2010, 41 (02) :247-256
[37]   Clashing frames: human rights and foreign policy in the Brazilian re-democratization process [J].
Roriz, Joao Henrique .
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE POLITICA INTERNACIONAL, 2017, 60 (01)
[38]   Instrumentalization of human rights in Canadian foreign policy? The twilight of internationalism and the emergence of neoconservatism in Guatemala [J].
Anzueto, Marc-Andre .
ETUDES INTERNATIONALES, 2014, 45 (04) :601-624
[39]   Human Rights and Democracy in Taiwan's Foreign Policy and Cross-Strait Relations [J].
Krumbein, Frederic .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TAIWAN STUDIES, 2019, 2 (02) :292-320
[40]   Security, development and human rights: Normative, legal and policy challenges for the international drug control system [J].
Barrett, Damon .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY, 2010, 21 (02) :140-144