Managing an existential threat: how a global crisis contaminates organizational decision-making

被引:13
作者
Norris, J. Ian [1 ]
Casa de Calvo, Mario P. [2 ]
Mather, Robert D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Berea Coll, Econ & Business, Berea, KY 40403 USA
[2] Univ North Texas Dallas, Psychol, Dallas, TX USA
[3] Univ Cent Oklahoma, Psychol, Edmond, OK USA
关键词
Judgment and decision-making; Terror management theory; Pandemic; Evolutionary-existential model; Existential threat; Evolutionary psychology; Prospect theory; TERROR MANAGEMENT; ANGER; UNCERTAINTY; HEURISTICS; JUDGMENTS; ATTENTION; WORLDVIEW; IMPLICIT; LEADERS; MEMORY;
D O I
10.1108/MD-08-2020-1034
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose The paper introduces a new model, the evolutionary-existential model of organizational decision-making. The purpose of the model is to provide an empirical framework for understanding the context for decision-making under conditions of existential threat to organizations, such as the global COVID-19 pandemic during the year 2020. Design/methodology/approach The model is built on an extensive interdisciplinary literature review, drawing from research in social psychology, management, behavioral economics, evolutionary psychology and consumer behavior. In general, the authors follow Bargal's (2006) call for action research in the spirit of Lewin (1951). Findings According to the model, organizational decision-making during the pandemic threat is influenced by (1) existential threat and (2) an unprecedented macroenvironmental context for decision-making. The authors argue that these psychological and macroenvironmental forces may lead to suboptimal decision-making, based on (1) their basic cognitive architecture and (2) specific evolutionary triggers activated by the pandemic. The authors highlight how the interaction between these inputs and the decision context manifest in various social psychological phenomena that are known to impact judgments and decisions. Practical implications Simply put, the magnitude and the urgency of the global pandemic call for new and integrative ways of understanding organizational decision-making. Originality/value The model is new. Although the authors draw on prior research and theory, the model is uniquely interdisciplinary; further, the authors are able to make specific and unique predictions about the inputs, decision context and their social-psychological consequences for decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:2117 / 2138
页数:22
相关论文
共 69 条
[51]  
Randolph-Seng B., 2015, J MANAG RES, V15, P34
[52]  
Randolph-Seng B, 2011, ACAD MANAGE REV, V36, P420
[53]  
Rottman J, 2014, EVOL PSYCHOL-US, V12, P417
[54]  
Roubini N., 2020, GUARDIAN, V25
[55]   Inspired to Create: Awe Enhances Openness to Learning and the Desire for Experiential Creation [J].
Rudd, Melanie ;
Hildebrand, Christian ;
Vohs, Kathleen D. .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2018, 55 (05) :766-781
[56]  
Schwarz N., 2001, THEORIES MOOD COGNIT, P159, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781410605733
[57]   Terror management and meaning: Evidence that the opportunity to defend the worldview in response to mortality salience increases the meaningfulness of life in the mildly depressed [J].
Simon, L ;
Arndt, J ;
Greenberg, J ;
Pyszczynski, T ;
Solomon, S .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 1998, 66 (03) :359-382
[58]   MOOD AND MEMORY - EVALUATING THE NETWORK THEORY OF AFFECT [J].
SINGER, JA ;
SALOVEY, P .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1988, 8 (02) :211-251
[59]   Scared to death or scared to love? Terror management theory and close relationships seeking [J].
Smieja, M ;
Kalaska, M ;
Adamczyk, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 36 (02) :279-296
[60]   In-Group Loyalty and the Punishment of Corruption [J].
Solaz, Hector ;
De Vries, Catherine E. ;
de Geus, Roosmarijn A. .
COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2019, 52 (06) :896-926