Managing an existential threat: how a global crisis contaminates organizational decision-making

被引:13
作者
Norris, J. Ian [1 ]
Casa de Calvo, Mario P. [2 ]
Mather, Robert D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Berea Coll, Econ & Business, Berea, KY 40403 USA
[2] Univ North Texas Dallas, Psychol, Dallas, TX USA
[3] Univ Cent Oklahoma, Psychol, Edmond, OK USA
关键词
Judgment and decision-making; Terror management theory; Pandemic; Evolutionary-existential model; Existential threat; Evolutionary psychology; Prospect theory; TERROR MANAGEMENT; ANGER; UNCERTAINTY; HEURISTICS; JUDGMENTS; ATTENTION; WORLDVIEW; IMPLICIT; LEADERS; MEMORY;
D O I
10.1108/MD-08-2020-1034
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose The paper introduces a new model, the evolutionary-existential model of organizational decision-making. The purpose of the model is to provide an empirical framework for understanding the context for decision-making under conditions of existential threat to organizations, such as the global COVID-19 pandemic during the year 2020. Design/methodology/approach The model is built on an extensive interdisciplinary literature review, drawing from research in social psychology, management, behavioral economics, evolutionary psychology and consumer behavior. In general, the authors follow Bargal's (2006) call for action research in the spirit of Lewin (1951). Findings According to the model, organizational decision-making during the pandemic threat is influenced by (1) existential threat and (2) an unprecedented macroenvironmental context for decision-making. The authors argue that these psychological and macroenvironmental forces may lead to suboptimal decision-making, based on (1) their basic cognitive architecture and (2) specific evolutionary triggers activated by the pandemic. The authors highlight how the interaction between these inputs and the decision context manifest in various social psychological phenomena that are known to impact judgments and decisions. Practical implications Simply put, the magnitude and the urgency of the global pandemic call for new and integrative ways of understanding organizational decision-making. Originality/value The model is new. Although the authors draw on prior research and theory, the model is uniquely interdisciplinary; further, the authors are able to make specific and unique predictions about the inputs, decision context and their social-psychological consequences for decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:2117 / 2138
页数:22
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
Abrams D., 1990, EUR J SOC PSYCHOL, V1, P195
[2]  
Adolphs R, 2001, HANDBOOK OF AFFECT AND SOCIAL COGNITION, P27
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, PSYCHOL TODAY
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1991, ADV EXPT SOCIAL PSYC
[5]   Heuristics as adaptive decision strategies in management [J].
Artinger, Florian ;
Petersen, Malte ;
Gigerenzer, Gerd ;
Weibler, Juergen .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2015, 36 :S33-S52
[6]  
Bargal D., 2006, ACTION RES-LONDON, V4, P367, DOI DOI 10.1177/1476750306070101
[7]   Evaluation of and support for group prototypical leaders: a meta-analysis of twenty years of empirical research [J].
Barreto, Nicolas B. ;
Hogg, Michael A. .
SOCIAL INFLUENCE, 2017, 12 (01) :41-55
[8]   INSENSITIVITY TO FUTURE CONSEQUENCES FOLLOWING DAMAGE TO HUMAN PREFRONTAL CORTEX [J].
BECHARA, A ;
DAMASIO, AR ;
DAMASIO, H ;
ANDERSON, SW .
COGNITION, 1994, 50 (1-3) :7-15
[9]   RATIONAL HEURISTICS: THE 'SIMPLE RULES' THAT STRATEGISTS LEARN FROM PROCESS EXPERIENCE [J].
Bingham, Christopher B. ;
Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2011, 32 (13) :1437-1464
[10]   Backward Masked Snakes and Guns Modulate Spatial Attention [J].
Carlson, Joshua M. ;
Fee, Andrea L. ;
Reinke, Karen S. .
EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 7 (04) :534-544