Comparison of radiation dose between 2D digital stereotactic versus digital breast tomosynthesis-guided breast biopsies

被引:6
作者
Amir, T. [1 ,2 ]
Zuckerman, S. P. [2 ]
Barufaldi, B. [2 ]
Maidment, A. D. [2 ]
Conant, E. F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, 300 E 66th St, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Hosp Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, 3400 Spruce St,1 Silverstein, Philadelphia, PA 19103 USA
关键词
Digital breast tomosynthesis; Stereotactic biopsy; Radiation dose; Dose reduction; REPORTING SYSTEM; MAMMOGRAPHY; COMBINATION; TRACKING; PITFALLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109407
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objective: Use of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in breast imaging has necessitated DBT-guided biopsy, however, a single DBT acquisition may result in a greater radiation dose than a single DM acquisition. Our objective was to compare the number of images acquired and the resulting radiation dose of DBT versus DM-guided breast biopsies. Method: All biopsies performed on our DM unit from 8/2016 to 1/2017 and on our DM-DBT unit from 8/2017 to 1/2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The number of image acquisitions, average glandular dose (AGD) per acquisition and per procedure were computed and stratified by guidance modality and lesion type. Results: 25 DM-guided biopsies were performed on the DM-only unit, 58 biopsies were performed with DM guidance on the dual unit (DM-DU) and 29 were performed with DBT. The average number of images acquisitions was 10.9 for DM-only unit biopsies, 9.3 images for DM-DU biopsies and 4.3 images for DBT-guided biopsies. Mean procedure AGD for DM-only unit biopsies was 28.77 mGy, versus 22.06 mGy for DM-DU and 10.18 mGy for DBT biopsies. Mean procedure AGD for biopsied calcification-only lesions was 22.3 mGy for DM-DU versus 10.7 mGy for DBT guidance (p < 0.001), with an average of 8.1 images per procedure for DM-DU versus 4.2 for DBT. Conclusion: Fewer image acquisitions were obtained with DBT compared with DM guidance, therefore, the overall dose of DBT-guided procedures was less. The dose reduction obtained with DBT is possible across all lesion types, even for calcification-only lesions.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Characterization of the imaging settings in screening mammography using a tracking and reporting system: A multi-center and multi-vendor analysis [J].
Barufaldi, Bruno ;
Zuckerman, Samantha P. ;
Medeiros, Regina B. ;
Maidment, Andrew D. ;
Schiabel, Homero .
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 71 :137-149
[2]   Design and implementation of a radiation dose tracking and reporting system for mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis [J].
Barufaldi, Bruno ;
Schiabel, Homero ;
Maidment, Andrew D. A. .
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 58 :131-140
[3]   Diagnostic Radiation Dose after the Implementation of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening [J].
Barufaldi, Bruno ;
McDonald, Elizabeth ;
Conant, Emily ;
Maidment, Andrew D. A. .
14TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON BREAST IMAGING (IWBI 2018), 2018, 10718
[4]   Image Wisely: A Campaign to Increase Awareness about Adult Radiation Protection [J].
Brink, James A. ;
Amis, E. Stephen, Jr. .
RADIOLOGY, 2010, 257 (03) :601-602
[5]   Stereotactic localization of breast lesions: How it works and methods to improve accuracy [J].
Carr, JJ ;
Hemler, PF ;
Halford, PW ;
Freimanis, RI ;
Choplin, RH ;
Chen, MYM .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2001, 21 (02) :463-473
[6]   Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography compared to digital mammography alone: a cohort study within the PROSPR consortium [J].
Conant, Emily F. ;
Beaber, Elisabeth F. ;
Sprague, Brian L. ;
Herschorn, Sally D. ;
Weaver, Donald L. ;
Onega, Tracy ;
Tosteson, Anna N. A. ;
McCarthy, Anne Marie ;
Poplack, Steven P. ;
Haas, Jennifer S. ;
Armstrong, Katrina ;
Schnall, Mitchell D. ;
Barlow, William E. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 156 (01) :109-116
[7]   Comparing Tumor Characteristics and Rates of Breast Cancers Detected by Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography [J].
Dang, Pragya A. ;
Wang, Aijia ;
Senapati, Gunjan M. ;
Ip, Ivan K. ;
Lacson, Ronilda ;
Khorasani, Ramin ;
Giess, Catherine S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2020, 214 (03) :701-706
[8]   Preliminary Clinical Experience with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in the Visualization of Breast Microcalcifications [J].
Destounis, Stamatia V. ;
Arieno, Andrea L. ;
Morgan, Renee C. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL IMAGING SCIENCE, 2013, 3
[9]   Breast Cancer Screening Using Tomosynthesis in Combination With Digital Mammography [J].
Friedewald, Sarah M. ;
Rafferty, Elizabeth A. ;
Rose, Stephen L. ;
Durand, Melissa A. ;
Plecha, Donna M. ;
Greenberg, Julianne S. ;
Hayes, Mary K. ;
Copit, Debra S. ;
Carlson, Kara L. ;
Cink, Thomas M. ;
Barke, Lora D. ;
Greer, Linda N. ;
Miller, Dave P. ;
Conant, Emily F. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 311 (24) :2499-2507
[10]   Radiation dose with digital breast tomosynthesis compared to digital mammography: per-view analysis [J].
Gennaro, Gisella ;
Bernardi, D. ;
Houssami, N. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (02) :573-581