The effects of motivation feedback in patients with severe mental illness: a cluster randomized controlled trial

被引:6
作者
Jochems, Eline C. [1 ,2 ]
van der Feltz-Cornelis, Christina M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
van Dam, Arno [3 ,4 ]
Duivenvoorden, Hugo J. [5 ]
Mulder, Cornelis L. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Epidemiol & Social Psychiat Res Inst, NL-3015 GE Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Top Clin Ctr Body Mind & Hlth, Breburg GG2, Tilburg, Netherlands
[3] Tilburg Univ, Fac Social Sci, Tranzo Dept, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
[4] GGZ Westelijk Noord Brabant, Bergen Op Zoom, Netherlands
[5] Erasmus MC Univ, Med Ctr, NL-3015 GE Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] Parnassia Psychiat Inst, BavoEuropoort, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
randomized controlled trial; feedback; motivation; adherence; psychotic disorders; personality disorders; SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; MANCHESTER SHORT ASSESSMENT; HEALTH-CARE; TREATMENT FAILURE; DUTCH VERSION; CLINICIAN; SCHIZOPHRENIA; PSYCHOTHERAPY; ADHERENCE;
D O I
10.2147/NDT.S95190
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of providing clinicians with regular feedback on the patient's motivation for treatment in increasing treatment engagement in patients with severe mental illness. Methods: Design: cluster randomized controlled trial (Dutch Trials Registry NTR2968). Participants: adult outpatients with a primary diagnosis of a psychotic disorder or a personality disorder and their clinicians, treated in 12 community mental health teams (the clusters) of two mental health institutions in the Netherlands. Interventions: monthly motivation feedback (MF) generated by clinicians additional to treatment as usual (TAU) and TAU by the community mental health teams. Primary outcome: treatment engagement at patient level, assessed at 12 months by clinicians. Randomization: teams were allocated to MF or TAU by a computerized randomization program that randomized each team to a single treatment by blocks of varying size. All participants within these teams received similar treatment. Clinicians and patients were not blind to treatment allocation at the 12-month assessment. Results: The 294 randomized patients (148 MF, 146 TAU) and 57 clinicians (29 MF, 28 TAU) of 12 teams (6 MF, 6 TAU) were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. No statistically significant differences between treatment groups on treatment engagement were found (adjusted mean difference = 0.1, 95% confidence interval =-2.2 to 2.3, P=0.96, d=0). Pre-planned ancillary analyses showed statistically significant interaction effects between treatment group and primary diagnosis on treatment motivation and quality of life (secondary outcomes), which were beneficial for patients with a primary diagnosis of a personality disorder but not for those with a psychotic disorder. There were no reports of adverse events. Conclusion: The current findings imply that monitoring and discussing the patient's motivation is insufficient to improve motivation and treatment engagement, and suggests that more elaborate interventions for severe mental illness patients are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:3049 / 3064
页数:16
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, INT J METHODS PSYCHI
[2]   Effects of Routine Feedback to Clinicians on Mental Health Outcomes of Youths: Results of a Randomized Trial [J].
Bickman, Leonard ;
Kelley, Susan Douglas ;
Breda, Carolyn ;
de Andrade, Ana Regina ;
Riemer, Manuel .
PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2011, 62 (12) :1423-1429
[3]   Quality of life in people with severe mental illness.: Reliability and validity of the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA) [J].
Björkman, T ;
Svensson, B .
NORDIC JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 59 (04) :302-306
[4]   Evaluating the impact of a quality of life assessment with feedback to clinicians in patients with schizophrenia: randomised controlled trial [J].
Boyer, Laurent ;
Lancon, Christophe ;
Baumstarck, Karine ;
Parola, Nathalie ;
Berbis, Julie ;
Auquier, Pascal .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 202 (06) :447-453
[5]   Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials [J].
Campbell, Marion K. ;
Piaggio, Gilda ;
Elbourne, Diana R. ;
Altman, Douglas G. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 345
[6]   Continuity of care for people with non-psychotic disorders [J].
Catty, Jocelyn ;
Cowan, Naomi ;
Poole, Zoe ;
Clement, Sarah ;
Ellis, Gemma ;
Geyer, Connie ;
Lissouba, Pascale ;
Molodynski, Andrew ;
White, Sarah ;
Burns, Tom .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 59 (01) :18-27
[7]   Factors associated with noncompliance with psychiatric outpatient visits [J].
Centorrino, F ;
Hernán, MA ;
Drago-Ferrante, G ;
Rendall, M ;
Apicella, A ;
Längar, G ;
Baldessarini, RJ .
PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2001, 52 (03) :378-380
[8]   Self-determination theory in health care and its relations to motivational interviewing: a few comments [J].
Deci, Edward L. ;
Ryan, Richard M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2012, 9
[9]   Self-Determination Theory: A Macrotheory of Human Motivation, Development, and Health [J].
Deci, Edward L. ;
Ryan, Richard M. .
CANADIAN PSYCHOLOGY-PSYCHOLOGIE CANADIENNE, 2008, 49 (03) :182-185
[10]   Facilitating Optimal Motivation and Psychological Well-Being Across Life's Domains [J].
Deci, Edward L. ;
Ryan, Richard M. .
CANADIAN PSYCHOLOGY-PSYCHOLOGIE CANADIENNE, 2008, 49 (01) :14-23