Comparison of peak shape in hydrophilic interaction chromatography using acidic salt buffers and simple acid solutions

被引:53
作者
Heaton, James C. [1 ]
Russell, Joseph J. [1 ]
Underwood, Tim [2 ]
Boughtflower, Robert [2 ]
McCalley, David V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ W England, Ctr Res Biosci, Bristol BS16 1QY, Avon, England
[2] GlaxoSmithKline, Analyt Chem, Stevenage, Herts, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
HILIC; Buffers; Column efficiency; Hydride phases; INTERACTION LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS-SPECTROMETRY; STATIONARY PHASES; ACETONITRILE/WATER MIXTURES; SILICA COLUMNS; PERFORMANCE; SELECTIVITY; SEPARATION; IONIZATION; RETENTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.chroma.2014.04.026
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The retention and peak shape of neutral, basic and acidic solutes was studied on hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) stationary phases that showed both strong and weak ionic retention characteristics, using aqueous acetonitrile mobile phases containing either formic acid (FA), ammonium formate (AF) or phosphoric acid (PA). The effect of organic solvent concentration on the results was also studied. Peak shape was good for neutrals under most mobile phase conditions. However, peak shapes for ionised solutes, particularly for basic compounds, were considerably worse in FA than AF. Even neutral compounds showed deterioration in performance with FA when the mobile phase water concentration was reduced. The poor performance in FA cannot be entirely attributed to the negative impact of ionic retention on ionised silanols on the underlying silica base materials, as results using PA at lower pH (where their ionisation is suppressed) were inferior to those in AF. Besides the moderating influence of the salt cation on ionic retention, it is likely that salt buffers improve peak shape due to the increased ionic strength of the mobile phase and its impact on the formation of the water layer on the column surface. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 48
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, HAL PENT HILIC BROCH
[2]   A comparison of the chromatographic properties of silica gel and silicon hydride modified silica gels [J].
Bawazeer, Saud ;
Sutcliffe, Oliver B. ;
Euerby, Melvin R. ;
Bawazeer, Sami ;
Watson, David G. .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2012, 1263 :61-67
[3]   Simultaneous separation of hydrophobic and hydrophilic peptides with a silica hydride stationary phase using aqueous normal phase conditions [J].
Boysen, Reinhard I. ;
Yang, Yuanzhong ;
Chowdhury, Jamil ;
Matyska, Maria T. ;
Pesek, Joseph J. ;
Hearn, Milton T. W. .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2011, 1218 (44) :8021-8026
[4]   δ Conversion parameter between pH scales (swpH and sspH) in acetonitrile/water mixtures at various compositions and temperatures [J].
Gagliardi, Leonardo G. ;
Castells, Cecilia B. ;
Rafols, Clara ;
Roses, Marti ;
Bosch, Elisabeth .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2007, 79 (08) :3180-3187
[5]  
Harris D.C.:., 2007, QUANTITATIVE CHEM AN, VSeventh
[6]   Hydrophilic interaction chromatography [J].
Hemstrom, Petrus ;
Irgum, Knut .
JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE, 2006, 29 (12) :1784-1821
[7]   Chromatographic characterization of hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography stationary phases: Hydrophilicity, charge effects, structural selectivity, and separation efficiency [J].
Kawachi, Yuusuke ;
Ikegami, Tohru ;
Takubo, Hirotaka ;
Ikegami, Yuka ;
Miyamoto, Masatoshi ;
Tanaka, Nobuo .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2011, 1218 (35) :5903-5919
[8]   Effect of eluent on the ionization process in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry [J].
Kostiainen, Risto ;
Kauppila, Tiina J. .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2009, 1216 (04) :685-699
[9]   Practical investigation of the factors that affect the selectivity in hydrophilic interaction chromatography [J].
Kumar, Abhinav ;
Heaton, James C. ;
McCalley, David V. .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2013, 1276 :33-46
[10]   Factors to consider in the development of generic bioanalytical high-performance liquid chromatographic-mass spectrometric methods to support drug discovery [J].
Law, B ;
Temesi, D .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B, 2000, 748 (01) :21-30