Adapting Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Assessing the Quality of Software Products. Current Approaches and Future Perspectives

被引:4
|
作者
Trendowicz, Adam [1 ]
Kopczynska, Sylwia [2 ]
机构
[1] Fraunhofer Inst Expt Software Engn IESE, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
[2] Poznan Univ Tech, Fac Comp, Inst Comp Sci, PL-60965 Poznan, Poland
来源
ADVANCES IN COMPUTERS, VOL 93 | 2014年 / 93卷
关键词
INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; MODEL; FRAMEWORK; SELECTION; DESIGN; AHP;
D O I
10.1016/B978-0-12-800162-2.00004-X
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Our great reliance on software-based systems and services nowadays requires software products of the highest quality. An essential prerequisite for developing software of guaranteed quality in a predictable way is the ability to model and objectively assess its quality throughout the project lifecycle. A potential approach must handle the abstract and multi-dimensional character of quality. Analogies between software quality assessment (SQA) and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) motivated us to investigate how MCDA methods can support SQA. Thus we (1) identified the most relevant requirements for an SQA method, (2) reviewed existing SQA methods regarding potential benefits from using MCDA methods, and (3) assessed some popular MCDA methods regarding their applicability for SQA. We found that although a number of SQA methods proposed in recent years already adapt MCDA methods, the exact rationales for selecting a particular method are usually unclear or arbitrary. Usually, neither the goals nor the constraints of SQA are explicitly considered. Existing SQA methods do not meet the relevant requirements and mostly share the same weaknesses independent of whether they employ MCDA or not. In many cases, popular MCDA techniques are unsuitable for SQA because they do not meet its basic constraints, such as handling situations where data are scarce. We discuss the gaps identified in MCDA. The results led us to the conclusion that future research should focus on resolving the deficits of the existing SQA methods or of the most promising MCDA techniques rather than on inventing new methods from scratch.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 226
页数:74
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Sensitivity analysis approaches in multi-criteria decision analysis: A systematic review
    Wieckowski, Jakub
    Salabun, Wojciech
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2023, 148
  • [2] Assessing the Preferences for Criteria in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Treatments for Rare Diseases
    Schey, Carina
    Postma, Maarten Jacobus
    Krabbe, Paul F. M.
    Topachevskyi, Olekdandr
    Volovyk, Andrew
    Connolly, Mark
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 8
  • [3] Integration of multi-criteria decision-making approaches adapted for quality function deployment: an analytical literature review and future research agenda
    Hariri, Ahmad
    Domingues, Pedro
    Sampaio, Paulo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2023, 40 (10) : 2326 - 2350
  • [4] Assessing the accuracy of GIS-based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis approaches for mapping groundwater potential
    Singh, Laishram Kanta
    Jha, Madan K.
    Chowdary, V. M.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 91 : 24 - 37
  • [5] Systematic review of software engineering uses of multi-criteria decision-making methods: Trends, bibliographic analysis, challenges, recommendations, and future directions
    Magabaleh, Aws A.
    Ghraibeh, Lana L.
    Audeh, Afnan Y.
    Albahri, A. S.
    Deveci, Muhammet
    Antucheviciene, Jurgita
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2024, 163
  • [6] Assessing the sustainable development: A review of multi-criteria decision analysis for urban and architectural sustainability
    Mecca, Beatrice
    JOURNAL OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS, 2023, 30 (5-6) : 203 - 218
  • [7] Using multi-criteria decision analysis for assessing sustainability of agricultural systems
    Talukder, Byomkesh
    Hipel, Keith W.
    vanLoon, Gary W.
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 26 (06) : 781 - 799
  • [8] Sustainability assessment of products based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis
    Feng, Chunhua
    Mai, Yunfei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 85 (1-4) : 695 - 710
  • [9] Assessing Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Models for Predicting Groundwater Quality in a River Basin of South India
    Jenifer, M. Annie
    Jha, Madan Kumar
    Khatun, Amina
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (12)
  • [10] Assessing Private Investment in African Renewable Energy Infrastructure: A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Approach
    Baumli, Kenny
    Jamasb, Tooraj
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (22) : 1 - 19