Cost effectiveness of increasing the dose intensity of chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in small-cell lung cancer - Based on data from the Medical Research Council LU19 trial

被引:7
作者
Bojke, Laura [1 ]
Sculpher, Mark
Stephens, Richard
Qian, Wendi
Thatcher, Nick
Girling, David
机构
[1] Univ York, Ctr Hlth Econ, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[2] MRC, Clin Trials Unit, Canc Div, London, England
[3] Christie Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Med Oncol, Manchester M20 4BX, Lancs, England
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00019053-200624050-00003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Background: The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) can enable dose intensification of chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, given its acquisition cost, it is important to assess its cost effectiveness within a resource-constrained health service. Objective: To assess the cost effectiveness, from the UK NHS perspective, of G-CSF given in addition to doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and etoposide (ACE) versus ACE alone in the management of SCLC. Methods: Using data from a UK Medical Research Council trial (LU19) to assess chemotherapy dose intensification in patients with previously untreated SCLC of any disease extent, a retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis was undertaken. Resource use data, including hospitalisations and non-protocol cancer treatments, were collected during the first 6-month treatment phase of the trial. Mean costs (E, 2003 values) of managing patients in the two arms of the trial were calculated. Mean survival duration was calculated for the two groups using patient-specific follow-up data collected in the trial. Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis was undertaken, and uncertainty in cost effectiveness was expressed using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Results: The use of G-CSF in addition to ACE chemotherapy is more costly (4647) pound but results in longer mean survival duration (0.20 years; 0.18 years when discounted). This generates an incremental cost per additional life-year of 25 pound 816 for ACE + G-CSF therapy. The probability of the addition of G-CSF being cost effective, if decision makers are willing to pay 30 pound 000 for an additional life-year, is 0.57. Secondary analysis suggests that cost effectiveness is likely to be sensitive to assumptions about the health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) experienced by patients. Conclusion: Based on data collected in the LU19 trial, chemotherapy dose intensification using G-CSF in SCLC adds to health service costs but increases survival duration. Its overall cost effectiveness is likely to be finely balanced.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 452
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   THE CE PLANE - A GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS [J].
BLACK, WC .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1990, 10 (03) :212-214
[2]  
*CANC RES UK, LUNG CANC HIST
[3]   Routine use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor is not cost-effective and does not increase patient comfort in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer: An analysis using a Markov model [J].
Chouaid, C ;
Bassinet, L ;
Fuhrman, C ;
Monnet, I ;
Housset, B .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (08) :2700-2707
[4]   A rational framework for decision making by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) [J].
Claxton, K ;
Sculpher, M ;
Drummond, M .
LANCET, 2002, 360 (9334) :711-715
[5]   The irrelevance of inference: a decision-making approach to the stochastic evaluation of health care technologies [J].
Claxton, K .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1999, 18 (03) :341-364
[6]   MEASURING PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PHYSICAL DISTRESS IN CANCER-PATIENTS - STRUCTURE AND APPLICATION OF THE ROTTERDAM-SYMPTOM-CHECKLIST [J].
DEHAES, JCJM ;
VANKNIPPENBERG, FCE ;
NEIJT, JP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1990, 62 (06) :1034-1038
[7]   THE EMERGING GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENT FOR ECONOMIC-EVALUATION OF PHARMACEUTICALS [J].
DRUMMOND, M .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1994, 6 :42-50
[8]  
Efron B., 1994, INTRO BOOTSTRAP, DOI DOI 10.1201/9780429246593
[9]   Thoracic radiotherapy for limited-stage small cell lung cancer: Issues of timing, volumes, dose, and fractionation [J].
Erridge, SC ;
Murray, N .
SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2003, 30 (01) :26-37
[10]   Cost effectiveness analysis and the consistency of decision making - Evidence from pharmaceutical reimbursement in Australia (1991 to 1996) [J].
George, B ;
Harris, A ;
Mitchell, A .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2001, 19 (11) :1103-1109