Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering in the presence of massive neutrinos

被引:26
|
作者
Zennaro, M. [1 ,2 ]
Bel, J. [2 ,3 ]
Dossett, J. [2 ]
Carbone, C. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Guzzo, L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dipartimento Fis, Via Celoria 16, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] INAF, Osservatorio Astron Brera, Via Brera 28, I-20121 Milan, Italy
[3] Aix Marseille Univ, Univ Toulon, CNRS, CPT, F-13009 Marseille, France
[4] Ist Nazl Fis Nucl, Sez Milano, Via Celoria 16, I-20133 Milan, Italy
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
neutrinos; cosmological parameters; dark energy; large-scale structure of Universe; LARGE-SCALE STRUCTURE; DARK-MATTER HALOES; PERTURBATION-THEORY; BETA-DECAY; SIMULATIONS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1093/mnras/sty670
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The clustering ratio is defined as the ratio between the correlation function and the variance of the smoothed overdensity field. In A cold dark matter (ACDM) cosmologies without massive neutrinos, it has already been proven to be independent of bias and redshift space distortions on a range of linear scales. It therefore can provide us with a direct comparison of predictions (for matter in real space) against measurements (from galaxies in redshift space). In this paper we first extend the applicability of such properties to cosmologies that account for massive neutrinos, by performing tests against simulated data. We then investigate the constraining power of the clustering ratio on cosmological parameters such as the total neutrino mass and the equation of state of dark energy. We analyse the joint posterior distribution of the parameters that satisfy both measurements of the galaxy clustering ratio in the SDSS-DR12, and the angular power spectra of cosmic microwave background temperature and polarization anisotropies measured by the Planck satellite. We find the clustering ratio to be very sensitive to the CDM density parameter, but less sensitive to the total neutrino mass. We also forecast the constraining power the clustering ratio will achieve, predicting the amplitude of its errors with a Euclid-like galaxy survey. First we compute parameter forecasts using the Planck covariance matrix alone, then we add information from the clustering ratio. We find a significant improvement on the constraint of all considered parameters, and in particular an improvement of 40 per cent for the CDM density and 14 per cent for the total neutrino mass.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 506
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Constraints on the cosmological constant ΩΛ from faint galaxy counts
    Rocca-Volmerange, B
    CLUSTERING AT HIGH REDSHIFT, 1999, 200 : 163 - 167
  • [42] Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing
    Abbott, T. M. C.
    Abdalla, F. B.
    Alarcon, A.
    Aleksic, J.
    Allam, S.
    Allen, S.
    Amara, A.
    Annis, J.
    Asorey, J.
    Avila, S.
    Bacon, D.
    Balbinot, E.
    Banerji, M.
    Banik, N.
    Barkhouse, W.
    Baumer, M.
    Baxter, E.
    Bechtol, K.
    Becker, M. R.
    Benoit-Levy, A.
    Benson, B. A.
    Bernstein, G. M.
    Bertin, E.
    Blazek, J.
    Bridle, S. L.
    Brooks, D.
    Brout, D.
    Buckley-Geer, E.
    Burke, D. L.
    Busha, M. T.
    Campos, A.
    Capozzi, D.
    Rosell, A. Carnero
    Kind, M. Carrasco
    Carretero, J.
    Castander, F. J.
    Cawthon, R.
    Chang, C.
    Chen, N.
    Childress, M.
    Choi, A.
    Conselice, C.
    Crittenden, R.
    Crocce, M.
    Cunha, C. E.
    D'Andrea, C. B.
    da Costa, L. N.
    Das, R.
    Davis, T. M.
    Davis, C.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2018, 98 (04)
  • [43] Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing
    Abbott, T. M. C.
    Aguena, M.
    Alarcon, A.
    Allam, S.
    Alves, O.
    Amon, A.
    Andrade-Oliveira, F.
    Annis, J.
    Avila, S.
    Bacon, D.
    Baxter, E.
    Bechtol, K.
    Becker, M. R.
    Bernstein, G. M.
    Bhargava, S.
    Birrer, S.
    Blazek, J.
    Brandao-Souza, A.
    Bridle, S. L.
    Brooks, D.
    Buckley-Geer, E.
    Burke, D. L.
    Camacho, H.
    Campos, A.
    Carnero Rosell, A.
    Carrasco Kind, M.
    Carretero, J.
    Castander, F. J.
    Cawthon, R.
    Chang, C.
    Chen, A.
    Chen, R.
    Choi, A.
    Conselice, C.
    Cordero, J.
    Costanzi, M.
    Crocce, M.
    da Costa, L. N.
    Pereira, M. E. da Silva
    Davis, C.
    Davis, T. M.
    De Vicente, J.
    DeRose, J.
    Desai, S.
    Di Valentino, E.
    Diehl, H. T.
    Dietrich, J. P.
    Dodelson, S.
    Doel, P.
    Doux, C.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2022, 105 (02)
  • [44] No New Cosmological Concordance with Massive Sterile Neutrinos
    Leistedt, Boris
    Peiris, Hiranya V.
    Verde, Licia
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2014, 113 (04)
  • [45] Constraints on composite Dirac neutrinos from observations of galaxy clusters
    Hundi, R. S.
    Roy, Sourov
    PHYSICS LETTERS B, 2011, 702 (04) : 228 - 234
  • [46] A DIFFICULTY WITH EVASION OF A COSMOLOGICAL LIMIT ON MASSIVE NEUTRINOS
    GRONAU, M
    YAHALOM, R
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 1984, 30 (11): : 2422 - 2423
  • [47] Constraints on assembly bias from galaxy clustering
    Zentner, Andrew R.
    Hearin, Andrew
    van den Bosch, Frank C.
    Lange, Johannes U.
    Villarreal, Antonio
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 485 (01) : 1196 - 1209
  • [48] The observed growth of massive galaxy clusters - I. Statistical methods and cosmological constraints
    Mantz, A.
    Allen, S. W.
    Rapetti, D.
    Ebeling, H.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2010, 406 (03) : 1759 - 1772
  • [49] Cosmological Constraints on a Massive Neutrino
    Kawasaki, Masahiro
    Sato, Katsuhiko
    PROGRESS OF THEORETICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 122 (01): : 205 - 217
  • [50] Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing using the MAGLIM lens sample
    Porredon, A.
    Crocce, M.
    Elvin-Poole, J.
    Cawthon, R.
    Giannini, G.
    De Vicente, J.
    Rosell, A. Carnero
    Ferrero, I
    Krause, E.
    Fang, X.
    Prat, J.
    Rodriguez-Monroy, M.
    Pandey, S.
    Pocino, A.
    Castander, F. J.
    Choi, A.
    Amon, A.
    Tutusaus, I
    Dodelson, S.
    Sevilla-Noarbe, I
    Fosalba, P.
    Gaztanaga, E.
    Alarcon, A.
    Alves, O.
    Andrade-Oliveira, F.
    Baxter, E.
    Bechtol, K.
    Becker, M. R.
    Bernstein, G. M.
    Blazek, J.
    Camacho, H.
    Campos, A.
    Kind, M. Carrasco
    Chintalapati, P.
    Cordero, J.
    DeRose, J.
    Di Valentino, E.
    Doux, C.
    Eifler, T. F.
    Everett, S.
    Ferte, A.
    Friedrich, O.
    Gatti, M.
    Gruen, D.
    Harrison, I
    Hartley, W. G.
    Herner, K.
    Huff, E. M.
    Huterer, D.
    Jain, B.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2022, 106 (10)