The influence of cash and technical assistance on household-level outcomes in payments for hydrological services programs in Chiapas, Mexico

被引:23
作者
Jones, Kelly W. [1 ]
Brenes, Carlos L. Munoz [2 ]
Shinbrot, Xoco A. [3 ]
Lopez-Baez, Walter [4 ]
Rivera-Castaneda, Andromeda [5 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Human Dimens Nat Resources, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Univ Idaho, Dept Nat Resources & Soc, Moscow, ID 83843 USA
[3] Colorado State Univ, Grad Degree Program Ecol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[4] Inst Nacl Invest Forestales Agr & Pecuarias, Veracruz, Chiapas, Mexico
[5] Fondo Conservac El Triunfo, Tuxtla Gutierrez, Chiapas, Mexico
关键词
Common property; Ejido; Extrinsic motivators; Forest conservation; Impact evaluation; Payment for ecosystem services; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; FOREST CONSERVATION; AGROFORESTRY INNOVATIONS; PROTECTED AREAS; LATIN-AMERICA; SOCIAL EQUITY; PARTICIPATION; IMPACT; DEFORESTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.04.008
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This paper examines whether and how payments for hydrological services (PHS) programs implemented on communal lands in Mexico result in household-level conservation and human wellbeing outcomes. We first use evaluation methods to establish the impact of PHS by comparing outcomes across seven communities enrolled, and one community not enrolled, in PHS. Second, we exploit variations in PHS program design across the enrolled communities to test the role of cash and technical assistance on outcomes. Data come from a 2016 cross-sectional survey of 261 households around El Triunfo Biosphere Reserve, in Chiapas, Mexico. We find that households enrolled in PHS implement more conservation actions and that some own more assets than similar households not enrolled in PHS. We find that asset ownership is positively correlated with a household's payment amount and that conservation practices are related to amount of assistance received. We also measure perceived equity and benefits for households enrolled in PHS and find that perceptions are correlated with both payment and assistance, and strongly influenced by community organization. Our results provide evidence that common-property PHS contracts can change household-level conservation and human wellbeing outcomes, but that these changes are dependent on the type of external motivator and community organization. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 218
页数:11
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]   Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects [J].
Abadie, A ;
Imbens, GW .
ECONOMETRICA, 2006, 74 (01) :235-267
[2]   Only One Tree from Each Seed? Environmental Effectiveness and Poverty Alleviation in Mexico's Payments for Ecosystem Services Program [J].
Alix-Garcia, Jennifer M. ;
Sims, Katharine R. E. ;
Yanez-Pagans, Patricia .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2015, 7 (04) :1-40
[3]   Forest Conservation and Slippage: Evidence from Mexico's National Payments for Ecosystem Services Program [J].
Alix-Garcia, Jennifer M. ;
Shapiro, Elizabeth N. ;
Sims, Katharine R. E. .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2012, 88 (04) :613-638
[4]   Not the same for everyone: Community views of Mexico's payment for environmental services programmes [J].
Almeida-Lenero, Lucia ;
Revollo-Fernandez, Daniel ;
Caro-Borrero, Angela ;
Ruiz-Mallen, Isabel ;
Corbera, Esteve ;
Mazari-Hiriart, Marisa ;
Figueroa, Fernanda .
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2017, 44 (03) :201-211
[5]  
Angrist JD, 2009, MOSTLY HARMLESS ECONOMETRICS: AN EMPIRICISTS COMPANION, P1
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ECOL ECON, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.029
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2016, 46 3IE
[8]  
[Anonymous], EST IMP PROGR PAG SE
[9]  
[Anonymous], REGL OP 2015
[10]  
[Anonymous], PROP INT AD CAMB CLI