Internalization of Mastery Goals: The Differential Effect of Teachers' Autonomy Support and Control

被引:11
作者
Benita, Moti [1 ]
Matos, Lennia [2 ]
机构
[1] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Dept Educ, Beer Sheva, Israel
[2] Ponifical Catholic Univ Peru, Dept Psychol, Lima, Peru
关键词
mastery goals; goal-complex; autonomy supportive teaching; controlling teaching; engagement; behavioral engagement; SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY; ACHIEVEMENT GOALS; HIERARCHICAL MODEL; STUDENTS MOTIVATION; PERCEIVED AUTONOMY; SCHOOL TEACHERS; ENGAGEMENT; REASONS; PERFORMANCE; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2020.599303
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Two linked studies explored whether students' perceptions differentiate between teachers' autonomy support and control when presenting mastery goals, and the outcomes of these two practices, in terms of students' internalization of mastery goals and their behavioral engagement. In two phases, Study 1 (N = 317) sought to validate a new instrument assessing students' perceptions of teachers' autonomy support and control when presenting mastery goals. Study 2 (N = 1,331) demonstrated that at both within- and between-classroom levels, perceptions of teachers' autonomy support for mastery goals were related to students' mastery goals' endorsement and behavioral engagement. These relations were mediated by students' autonomous reasons to pursue learning activities. Perceptions of teachers' control predicted disengagement through controlled reasons for learning, but only at the within-classroom level. This research joins a growing body of work demonstrating that combining achievement goal theory with SDT can further our understanding of the underpinnings of achievement motivation. It suggests that if teachers want their students to endorse mastery goals (and be more engaged), they need to use more autonomy supportive practices and less controlling ones.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 77 条
[71]   Achievement Goals, Reasons for Goal Pursuit, and Achievement Goal Complexes as Predictors of Beneficial Outcomes: Is the Influence of Goals Reducible to Reasons? [J].
Sommet, Nicolas ;
Elliot, Andrew J. .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 109 (08) :1141-1162
[72]   Understanding motivation in sport: An experimental test of achievement goal and self determination theories [J].
Spray, Christopher M. ;
Wang, C. K. John ;
Biddle, Stuart J. H. ;
Chatzisarantis, Nikos L. D. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SPORT SCIENCE, 2006, 6 (01) :43-51
[73]   Achievement goal orientations and academic well-being across the transition to upper secondary education [J].
Tuominen-Soini, Heta ;
Salmela-Aro, Katariina ;
Niemivirta, Markku .
LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2012, 22 (03) :290-305
[74]   Moving the Achievement Goal Approach One Step Forward: Toward a Systematic Examination of the Autonomous and Controlled Reasons Underlying Achievement Goals [J].
Vansteenkiste, Maarten ;
Lens, Willy ;
Elliot, Andrew J. ;
Soenens, Bart ;
Mouratidis, Athanasios .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2014, 49 (03) :153-174
[75]   Autonomous and controlled regulation of performance-approach goals: Their relations to perfectionism and educational outcomes [J].
Vansteenkiste, Maarten ;
Smeets, Stijn ;
Soenens, Bart ;
Lens, Willy ;
Matos, Lennia ;
Deci, Edward L. .
MOTIVATION AND EMOTION, 2010, 34 (04) :333-353
[76]   Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: A test of self-determination theory [J].
Williams, GC ;
Deci, EL .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 70 (04) :767-779
[77]   Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students' motivation, cognition, and achievement [J].
Wolters, CA .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 96 (02) :236-250