Internalization of Mastery Goals: The Differential Effect of Teachers' Autonomy Support and Control

被引:11
作者
Benita, Moti [1 ]
Matos, Lennia [2 ]
机构
[1] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Dept Educ, Beer Sheva, Israel
[2] Ponifical Catholic Univ Peru, Dept Psychol, Lima, Peru
关键词
mastery goals; goal-complex; autonomy supportive teaching; controlling teaching; engagement; behavioral engagement; SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY; ACHIEVEMENT GOALS; HIERARCHICAL MODEL; STUDENTS MOTIVATION; PERCEIVED AUTONOMY; SCHOOL TEACHERS; ENGAGEMENT; REASONS; PERFORMANCE; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2020.599303
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Two linked studies explored whether students' perceptions differentiate between teachers' autonomy support and control when presenting mastery goals, and the outcomes of these two practices, in terms of students' internalization of mastery goals and their behavioral engagement. In two phases, Study 1 (N = 317) sought to validate a new instrument assessing students' perceptions of teachers' autonomy support and control when presenting mastery goals. Study 2 (N = 1,331) demonstrated that at both within- and between-classroom levels, perceptions of teachers' autonomy support for mastery goals were related to students' mastery goals' endorsement and behavioral engagement. These relations were mediated by students' autonomous reasons to pursue learning activities. Perceptions of teachers' control predicted disengagement through controlled reasons for learning, but only at the within-classroom level. This research joins a growing body of work demonstrating that combining achievement goal theory with SDT can further our understanding of the underpinnings of achievement motivation. It suggests that if teachers want their students to endorse mastery goals (and be more engaged), they need to use more autonomy supportive practices and less controlling ones.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   Toward an Integrative and Fine-Grained Insight in Motivating and Demotivating Teaching Styles: The Merits of a Circumplex Approach [J].
Aelterman, Nathalie ;
Vansteenkiste, Maarten ;
Haerens, Leen ;
Soenens, Bart ;
Fontaine, Johnny R. J. ;
Reeve, Johnmarshall .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 111 (03) :497-521
[2]   CLASSROOMS - GOALS, STRUCTURES, AND STUDENT MOTIVATION [J].
AMES, C .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 84 (03) :261-271
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods
[4]   Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students' engagement in schoolwork [J].
Assor, A ;
Kaplan, H ;
Roth, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 72 :261-278
[5]   Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: The role of anger and anxiety [J].
Assor, A ;
Kaplan, H ;
Kanat-Maymon, Y ;
Roth, G .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2005, 15 (05) :397-413
[6]   Investigating the multidimensionality of engagement: Affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement across science activities and contexts [J].
Ben-Eliyahu, Adar ;
Moore, Debra ;
Dorph, Rena ;
Schunn, Christian D. .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 53 :87-105
[7]   The important role of the context in which achievement goals are adopted: an experimental test [J].
Benita, Moti ;
Shane, Noa ;
Elgali, Orit ;
Roth, Guy .
MOTIVATION AND EMOTION, 2017, 41 (02) :180-195
[8]   When Are Mastery Goals More Adaptive? It Depends on Experiences of Autonomy Support and Autonomy [J].
Benita, Moti ;
Roth, Guy ;
Deci, Edward L. .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 106 (01) :258-267
[9]   Goal-directed behavior and contextual factors in the classroom: An innovative approach to the study of multiple goals [J].
Boekaerts, M ;
de Koning, E ;
Vedder, P .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2006, 41 (01) :33-51
[10]   Achievement goals in social interactions: Learning with mastery vs. performance goals [J].
Darnon, Celine ;
Butera, Fabrizio ;
Harackiewicz, Judith M. .
MOTIVATION AND EMOTION, 2007, 31 (01) :61-70