Prospective Evaluation of PI-RADS Version 2.1 for Prostate Cancer Detection

被引:30
作者
Walker, Stephanie M. [1 ]
Mehralivand, Sherif [1 ]
Harmon, Stephanie A. [1 ,2 ]
Sanford, Thomas [1 ]
Merino, Maria J. [3 ]
Wood, Bradford J. [4 ,5 ]
Shih, Joanna H. [6 ]
Pinto, Peter A. [7 ]
Choyke, Peter L. [1 ]
Turkbey, Baris [1 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Mol Imaging Program, NIH, 10 Ctr Dr,Rm B3B85, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Frederick Natl Lab Canc Res, Clin Res Directorate, Bethesda, MD USA
[3] NCI, Lab Pathol, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] NCI, Ctr Intervent Oncol, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[5] NIH, Radiol & Imaging Sci, Clin Ctr, Bldg 10, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[6] NCI, Biometr Res Branch, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[7] NCI, Urol Oncol Branch, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
early detection; multiparametric MRI; PI-RADS; prostate biopsy; prostate cancer; BIOPSY; MRI; DIAGNOSIS; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.19.22679
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data and System version 2.1 (PI-RADSv2.1), which was released in March 2019 to update version 2.0, for prostate cancer detection with transrectal ultrasound-MRI fusion biopsy and 12-core systematic biopsy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. This prospective study included 110 consecutively registered patients who underwent multiparametric MRI evaluated with PI-RADSv2.1 criteria followed by fusion biopsy and systematic biopsy between April and September 2019. Lesion-based cancer detection rates (CDRs) were calculated for prostate cancer (Gleason grade group, > 0) and clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason grade group, > 1). RESULTS. A total of 171 lesions (median size, 1.1 cm) in 110 patients were detected and evaluated with PI-RADSv2.1. In 16 patients no lesion was detected, and only systematic biopsy was performed. Lesions were categorized as follows: PI-RADS category 1, 1 lesion; PI-RADS category 2, 34 lesions; PI-RADS category 3, 54 lesions; PI-RADS category 4, 52 lesions; and PI-RADS category 5, 30 lesions. Histopathologic analysis revealed prostate cancer in 74 of 171 (43.3%) lesions and clinically significant prostate cancer in 57 of 171 (33.3%) lesions. The CDRs of prostate cancer for PI-RADS 2, 3, 4, and 5 lesions were 20.0%, 24.1%, 51.9%, and 90.0%. The CDRs of clinically significant prostate cancer for PI-RADS 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 lesions were 0%, 5.7%, 14.8%, 44.2%, and 80.0%. In 16 patients with normal multiparametric MRI findings ( PI-RADS 1), the CDRs were 50.0% for PCa and 18.8% for clinically significant prostate cancer. CONCLUSION. This investigation yielded CDRs assessed with prospectively assigned PI-RADSv2.1 scores. CDRs increased with higher PI-RADSv2.1 scores. These results can be compared with previously published outcomes derived with PI-RADS version 2.0.
引用
收藏
页码:1098 / 1103
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Bosaily, Ahmed El-Shater
    Brown, Louise C.
    Gabe, Rhian
    Kaplan, Richard
    Parmar, Mahesh K.
    Collaco-Moraes, Yolanda
    Ward, Katie
    Hindley, Richard G.
    Freeman, Alex
    Kirkham, Alex P.
    Oldroyd, Robert
    Parker, Chris
    Emberton, Mark
    [J]. LANCET, 2017, 389 (10071) : 815 - 822
  • [2] ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Richenberg, Jonathan
    Clements, Richard
    Choyke, Peter
    Verma, Sadhna
    Villeirs, Geert
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Logager, Vibeke
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) : 746 - 757
  • [3] Accuracy of Multiparametric MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection: A Meta-Analysis
    de Rooij, Maarten
    Hamoen, Esther H. J.
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Rovers, Maroeska M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 202 (02) : 343 - 351
  • [4] A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Zelefsky, Michael J.
    Sjoberg, Daniel D.
    Nelson, Joel B.
    Egevad, Lars
    Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Parwani, Anil V.
    Reuter, Victor E.
    Fine, Samson W.
    Eastham, James A.
    Wiklund, Peter
    Han, Misop
    Reddy, Chandana A.
    Ciezki, Jay P.
    Nyberg, Tommy
    Klein, Eric A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (03) : 428 - 435
  • [5] All over the map: An interobserver agreement study of tumor location based on the PI-RADSv2 sector map
    Greer, Matthew D.
    Shih, Joanna H.
    Barrett, Tristan
    Bednarova, Sandra
    Kabakus, Ismail
    Law, Yan Mee
    Shebel, Haytham
    Merino, Maria J.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Turkbey, Baris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2018, 48 (02) : 482 - 490
  • [6] MRI-Targeted Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis
    Vickers, Andrew
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 379 (06) : 589 - 589
  • [7] Prospective Evaluation of PI-RADS™ Version 2 Using the International Society of Urological Pathology Prostate Cancer Grade Group System
    Mehralivand, Sherif
    Bednarova, Sandra
    Shih, Joanna. H.
    Mertan, Francesca V.
    Gaur, Sonia
    Merino, Maria J.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Turkbey, Baris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 198 (03) : 583 - 589
  • [8] Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: Lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer
    Noguchi, M
    Stamey, TA
    McNeal, JE
    Yemoto, CM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (01) : 104 - 109
  • [9] Pearson's Chi-Square Test and Rank Correlation Inferences for Clustered Data
    Shih, Joanna H.
    Fay, Michael P.
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2017, 73 (03) : 822 - 834
  • [10] Comparison of MR/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Biopsy With Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
    Siddiqui, M. Minhaj
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    Turkbey, Baris
    George, Arvin K.
    Rothwax, Jason
    Shakir, Nabeel
    Okoro, Chinonyerem
    Raskolnikov, Dima
    Parnes, Howard L.
    Linehan, W. Marston
    Merino, Maria J.
    Simon, Richard M.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 313 (04): : 390 - 397