Uptake of minimally invasive surgery for early stage colorectal cancer and its effect on survival: A population-based study

被引:7
作者
Akhtar-Danesh, Noori [1 ,2 ]
Logie, Kathleen [3 ]
Akhtar-Danesh, Gileh-Gol [3 ]
Finley, Christian [4 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Sch Nursing, 1280 Main St West,Room 2J21D, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Surg, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Div Thorac Surg, Dept Surg, Hamilton, ON, Canada
来源
SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD | 2020年 / 35卷
关键词
Minimally invasive surgery; Survival analysis; Colorectal cancer; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; OPEN COLECTOMY; COLON-CANCER; IMPLEMENTATION; DIAGNOSIS; RESECTION; PATIENT; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.suronc.2020.10.017
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The uptake of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for colorectal cancer (CRC) varies between jurisdictions. We aimed to identify the factors associated with the uptake of MIS for early-stage CRC and its oncologic outcomes in the Canadian province of Ontario. Methods: This study includes all patients with CRC in Ontario from 2007 to 2017. A logistic regression analysis was used to identify the predictors of MIS and a flexible parametric survival model to estimate survival rates based on MIS versus open surgery. Results: In total, 14,675 patients with CRC were identified of which 29.5% had MIS resections. The likelihood of undergoing MIS decreased with age, disease stage, and distance to the regional cancer center, and increased with year of diagnosis. The likelihood of mortality for MIS was significantly lower compared to open surgery (p < 0.001). In terms of survival, MIS was most beneficial to older patients with stage II disease, despite their lower likelihood of receiving MIS. Conclusions: Despite the lower uptake of MIS among older patients and patients with stage II disease, these patients had the greatest long-term survival benefit from MIS. This suggests further use of laparoscopy to patient populations that are often excluded.
引用
收藏
页码:540 / 546
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Understanding of regional variation in the use of surgery
    Birkmeyer, John D.
    Reames, Bradley N.
    McCulloch, Peter
    Carr, Andrew J.
    Campbell, W. Bruce
    Wennberg, John E.
    [J]. LANCET, 2013, 382 (9898) : 1121 - 1129
  • [2] Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer:: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial
    Bonjer, HJ
    Haglind, E
    Jeekel, I
    Kazemier, G
    Páhlman, L
    Hop, WCJ
    Veldkamp, R
    Kuhry, E
    Haglind, E
    Pahlman, L
    Cuesta, MA
    Msika, S
    Morino, M
    Lacy, A
    Jeekel, I
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2005, 6 (07) : 477 - 484
  • [3] The Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Stage of Cancer at Diagnosis and Survival A Population-Based Study in Ontario, Canada
    Booth, Christopher M.
    Li, Gavin
    Zhang-Salomons, Jina
    Mackillop, William J.
    [J]. CANCER, 2010, 116 (17) : 4160 - 4167
  • [4] Canadian Institute for Health Information, 2015, CAN CLASS HLTH INTER, V2015
  • [5] Controversies in Surgical Oncology: Does the Minimally Invasive Approach for Rectal Cancer Provide Equivalent Oncologic Outcomes Compared with the Open Approach?
    Cleary, Robert K.
    Morris, Arden M.
    Chang, George J.
    Halverson, Amy L.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (12) : 3587 - 3595
  • [6] Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases The OSLO-COMET Randomized Controlled Trial
    Fretland, Asmund Avdem
    Dagenborg, Vegar Johansen
    Bjornelv, Gudrun Maria Waaler
    Kazaryan, Airazat M.
    Kristiansen, Ronny
    Fagerland, Morten Wang
    Hausken, John
    Tonnessen, Tor Inge
    Abildgaard, Andreas
    Barkhatov, Leonid
    Yaqub, Sheraz
    Rosok, Bard I.
    Bjornbeth, Bjorn Atle
    Andersen, Marit Helen
    Flatmark, Kjersti
    Aas, Eline
    Edwin, Bjorn
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2018, 267 (02) : 199 - 207
  • [7] Transitional impact of short- and long-term outcomes of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer from Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0404
    Fujii, Shoichi
    Akagi, Tomonori
    Inomata, Masafumi
    Katayama, Hiroshi
    Mizusawa, Junki
    Ota, Mitsuyoshi
    Saito, Shuji
    Kinugasa, Yusuke
    Yamaguchi, Shigeki
    Sato, Takeo
    Kitano, Seigo
    [J]. ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2019, 3 (03): : 301 - 309
  • [8] A population-based study of ethnicity and breast cancer stage at diagnosis in Ontario
    Ginsburg, O. M.
    Fischer, H. D.
    Shah, B. R.
    Lipscombe, L.
    Fu, L.
    Anderson, G. M.
    Rochon, P. A.
    [J]. CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 (02) : 97 - 104
  • [9] Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer
    Green, B. L.
    Marshall, H. C.
    Collinson, F.
    Quirke, P.
    Guillou, P.
    Jayne, D. G.
    Brown, J. M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (01) : 75 - 82
  • [10] HEALD RJ, 1979, BRIT J HOSP MED, V22, P277