SERUM PSA LEVEL AND GLEASON SCORES OF NEEDLE BIOPSY SPECIMENS PREDICT THE POSTOPERATIVE PATHOLOGIC GRADE OF PROSTATE CANCER

被引:0
作者
Fang, You-Qiang [1 ]
Zhou, Xiang-Fu [1 ]
Qiu, Jian-Guang [1 ]
Wen, Xing-Qiao [1 ]
Wang, De-Juan [1 ]
Pang, Jun [1 ]
Liu, Xiao-Peng [1 ]
Su, Zu-Lan [2 ]
Gao, Xin [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Urol, Affiliated Hosp 3, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Pathol, Affiliated Hosp 3, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
ACTA MEDICA MEDITERRANEA | 2013年 / 29卷 / 02期
基金
高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金;
关键词
Prostate specific antigen; prostate cancer; gleason score; needle biopsy; radical prostatectomy; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; CARCINOMA; DISCREPANCIES; PROGRESSION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the correlation between postoperative pathologic grade of prostate cancer (PC) and preoperative serum PSA as well as grade of biopsy specimens. Methods: The serum PSA and preoperative and postoperative Gleason scores of PC were retrospectively analyzed in 75 patients. Correlation between serum PSA and postoperative Gleason score was evaluated, and the Gleason score before surgery was compared with that after surgery with Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: The PSA before operation was 4-230 ng/mL (mean: 33.5 ng/mL) and the Gleason score of biopsy specimen was 2-9 (mean: 4.4). The Gleason score of specimens following radical prostatectomy was 2 similar to 10 (mean: 4.8). Preoperative serum PSA was positively correlated with postoperative Gleason score (r(s)=0.279, P=0.015). Gleason score of biopsy specimens was significantly lower than that after radical prostatectomy (P=0.011). Conclusions: High PSA level is associated with high Gleason score of specimens after radical prostatectomy. Pre-operative pathological examination of biopsy specimens may under-grade the PC. Re-biopsy is recommended to avoid underestimation of PC if necessary.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 283
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Implementation of a map in radical prostatectomy specimen allows visual estimation of tumor volume [J].
Bettendorf, O. ;
Oberpenning, F. ;
Koepke, T. ;
Heinecke, A. ;
Hertle, L. ;
Boecker, W. ;
Semjonow, A. .
EJSO, 2007, 33 (03) :352-357
[2]   Molecular pathology of prostate cancer [J].
Cazares, L. H. ;
Drake, R. R. ;
Esquela-Kirscher, A. ;
Lance, R. S. ;
Semmes, O. J. ;
Troyer, D. A. .
CANCER BIOMARKERS, 2011, 9 (1-6) :441-459
[3]   The combined percentage of gleason patterns 4 and 5 is the best predictor of cancer progression after radical prostatectomy [J].
Cheng, L ;
Koch, MO ;
Juliar, BE ;
Daggy, JK ;
Foster, RS ;
Bihrle, R ;
Gardner, TA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (13) :2911-2917
[4]   Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of prostate cancer Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology [J].
Chun, FKH ;
Steuber, T ;
Erbersdobler, A ;
Currlin, E ;
Walz, J ;
Schlomm, T ;
Haese, A ;
Heinzer, H ;
McCormack, M ;
Huland, H ;
Graefen, M ;
Karakiewicz, PI .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 49 (05) :820-826
[5]   Current practice of Gleason grading among genitourinary pathologists [J].
Egevad, L ;
Allsbrook, WC ;
Epstein, JI .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2005, 36 (01) :5-9
[6]   The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma [J].
Epstein, JI ;
Allsbrook, WC ;
Amin, MB ;
Egevad, LL ;
Bastacky, S ;
Beltrán, AL ;
Berner, A ;
Billis, A ;
Boccon-Gibod, L ;
Cheng, L ;
Civantos, F ;
Cohen, C ;
Cohen, MB ;
Datta, M ;
Davis, C ;
Delahunt, B ;
Delprado, W ;
Eble, JN ;
Foster, CS ;
Furusato, M ;
Gaudin, PB ;
Grignon, DJ ;
Humphrey, PA ;
Iczkowski, KA ;
Jones, EC ;
Lucia, S ;
McCue, PA ;
Nazeer, T ;
Oliva, E ;
Pan, CC ;
Pizov, G ;
Reuter, V ;
Samaratunga, H ;
Sebo, T ;
Sesterhenn, I ;
Shevchuk, M ;
Srigley, JR ;
Suzigan, S ;
Takahashi, H ;
Tamboli, P ;
Tan, PH ;
Têtu, B ;
Tickoo, S ;
Tomaszewski, JE ;
Troncoso, P ;
Tsuzuki, T ;
True, LD ;
van der Kwast, T ;
Wheeler, TM ;
Wojno, KJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 29 (09) :1228-1242
[7]   An Update of the Gleason Grading System [J].
Epstein, Jonathan I. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (02) :433-440
[8]   The prostatic specific antigen era is alive and well: Prostatic specific antigen and biochemical progression following radical prostatectomy [J].
Freedland, SJ ;
Mangold, LA ;
Walsh, PC ;
Partin, AW .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 174 (04) :1276-1281
[9]   Expression of bFGF/FGFR-1 and vascular proliferation related to clinicopathologic features and tumor progress in localized prostate cancer [J].
Gravdal, K ;
Halvorsen, OK ;
Haukaas, SA ;
Akslen, LA .
VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2006, 448 (01) :68-74
[10]   Current practice of Gleason grading of prostate carcinoma [J].
Lopez-Beltran, A ;
Mikuz, G ;
Luque, R ;
Mazzucchelli, R ;
Montironi, R .
VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2006, 448 (02) :111-118