Perceptual and Gaze Biases during Face Processing: Related or Not?

被引:7
作者
Samson, Helene [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fiori-Duharcourt, Nicole [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dore-Mazars, Karine [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Lemoine, Christelle [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Vergilino-Perez, Dorine [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris 05, Lab Vis Act Cognit, Inst Univ Paris Descartes Psychol, Inst Psychol, Boulogne Billancourt, France
[2] Univ Paris 05, INC, Boulogne Billancourt, France
[3] Sorbonne Paris Cite, Boulogne Billancourt, France
[4] Inst Univ France, Paris, France
关键词
VISUAL HEMISPACE BIAS; CHIMERIC FACES; SACCADIC LATENCY; ASYMMETRIES; RECOGNITION; TASK; DIFFICULTY; JUDGMENTS; PATTERNS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0085746
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Previous studies have demonstrated a left perceptual bias while looking at faces, due to the fact that observers mainly use information from the left side of a face (from the observer's point of view) to perform a judgment task. Such a bias is consistent with the right hemisphere dominance for face processing and has sometimes been linked to a left gaze bias, i.e. more and/or longer fixations on the left side of the face. Here, we recorded eye-movements, in two different experiments during a gender judgment task, using normal and chimeric faces which were presented above, below, right or left to the central fixation point or on it (central position). Participants performed the judgment task by remaining fixated on the fixation point or after executing several saccades (up to three). A left perceptual bias was not systematically found as it depended on the number of allowed saccades and face position. Moreover, the gaze bias clearly depended on the face position as the initial fixation was guided by face position and landed on the closest half-face, toward the center of gravity of the face. The analysis of the subsequent fixations revealed that observers move their eyes from one side to the other. More importantly, no apparent link between gaze and perceptual biases was found here. This implies that we do not look necessarily toward the side of the face that we use to make a gender judgment task. Despite the fact that these results may be limited by the absence of perceptual and gaze biases in some conditions, we emphasized the inter-individual differences observed in terms of perceptual bias, hinting at the importance of performing individual analysis and drawing attention to the influence of the method used to study this bias.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Start Position Strongly Influences Fixation Patterns during Face Processing: Difficulties with Eye Movements as a Measure of Information Use [J].
Arizpe, Joseph ;
Kravitz, Dwight J. ;
Yovel, Galit ;
Baker, Chris I. .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (02)
[2]   Gaze behavior in face comparison: The roles of sex, task, and symmetry [J].
Armann, Regine ;
Buelthoff, Isabelle .
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2009, 71 (05) :1107-1126
[3]   Perceptual asymmetry for chimeric stimuli in children with early unilateral brain damage [J].
Bava, S ;
Ballantyne, AO ;
May, SJ ;
Trauner, DA .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2005, 59 (01) :1-10
[4]  
Becker W., 1989, NEUROBIOLOGY SACCADI
[5]   Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans [J].
Bentin, S ;
Allison, T ;
Puce, A ;
Perez, E ;
McCarthy, G .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1996, 8 (06) :551-565
[6]   Viewpoint and center of gravity affect eye movements to human faces [J].
Bindemann, Markus ;
Scheepers, Christoph ;
Burton, A. Mike .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2009, 9 (02)
[7]   Culture Shapes How We Look at Faces [J].
Blais, Caroline ;
Jack, Rachael E. ;
Scheepers, Christoph ;
Fiset, Daniel ;
Caldara, Roberto .
PLOS ONE, 2008, 3 (08)
[8]   Perceptual asymmetries are preserved in memory for highly familiar faces of self and friend [J].
Brady, N ;
Campbell, M ;
Flaherty, M .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2005, 58 (03) :334-342
[9]   WHAT GIVES A FACE ITS GENDER [J].
BROWN, E ;
PERRETT, DI .
PERCEPTION, 1993, 22 (07) :829-840
[10]   UNDERSTANDING FACE RECOGNITION [J].
BRUCE, V ;
YOUNG, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 77 :305-327