Pedicle Screw Insertion: Is O-Arm-Based Navigation Superior to the Conventional Freehand Technique? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:28
|
作者
Sun, Jun [1 ]
Wu, Dongying [1 ]
Wang, Qiuan [1 ]
Wei, Yangyang [1 ]
Yuan, Feng [1 ]
机构
[1] Xuzhou Med Univ, Dept Orthoped, Affiliated Hosp, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
C-arm; Freehand technique; Navigation; O-arm; Pedicle screw; Spinal surgery; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; PLACEMENT ACCURACY; RADIATION-EXPOSURE; FLUOROSCOPY; LUMBAR; COMPLICATIONS; FIXATION; SURGEON;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2020.07.205
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Although O-arm-based navigation (ON) has been considered a better choice than the conventional freehand (FH) technique for spine surgery, clinical evidence showing the accuracy of ON compared with the FH technique is limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion under ON compared with the FH technique. METHODS: The Cochrane Library, Ovid, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and CNKI online databases were searched up to January 2020. Because only a few randomized controlled trials were anticipated, prospective and retrospective comparative studies were also evaluated to compare the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion between ON and FH. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 16.0. The primary outcomes extracted from articles that met the selection criteria were expressed as odds ratios for dichotomous outcomes with a 95% confidence interval. A chi(2) test and I-2 statistics were used to evaluate heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 20 reviews were included in this meta-analysis without identifying additional studies from the references of published articles. These reviews included 1422 patients and 9982 screws. ON was used to insert 4797 pedicle screws and 5185 pedicle screws were inserted using the conventional FH technique with C-arm assistance. The meta-analysis showed that ON is significantly more accurate than FH pedicle screw insertion (odds ratio, 2.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.92-3.16; I-2 = 43.4%; P = 0.021). I-2 indicates that the studies have a moderate statistical heterogeneity; subgroup analysis decreased heterogeneity significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with conventional methods, navigation provides greater accuracy in the placement of pedicle screws, accelerates the insertion, and reduces the complications associated with screw insertion. However, it may increase exposure time to radiation, which may harm the patient's or surgeon's health.
引用
收藏
页码:E87 / E99
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Accuracy and Safety in Screw Placement in the High Cervical Spine Retrospective Analysis of O-arm-based Navigation-assisted C1 Lateral Mass and C2 Pedicle Screws
    Hur, Jung-Woo
    Kim, Jin-Sung
    Ryu, Kyeong-Sik
    Shin, Myeong-Hoon
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (04): : E193 - E199
  • [42] Comparison of pullout strength of the thoracic pedicle screw between intrapedicular and extrapedicular technique: a meta-analysis and literature review
    Wang, Hua
    Wang, Huafeng
    Sen Sribastav, Shilabant
    Ye, Fubiao
    Liang, Chunxiang
    Li, Zemin
    Wang, Jianru
    Liu, Hui
    Wang, Xin
    Zheng, Zhaomin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 8 (12): : 22237 - 22245
  • [43] Three-dimensional Printed Drill Guides Versus Fluoroscopic-guided Freehand Technique for Pedicle Screw Placement A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Radiographic Operative, and Clinical Outcomes
    Wallace, Nicholas
    Butt, Bilal B.
    Aleem, Ilyas
    Patel, Rakesh
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 33 (08): : 314 - 322
  • [44] Robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement accuracy compared with alternative guidance in lateral single-position surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Patel, Neal A.
    Kuo, Cathleen C.
    Pennington, Zach
    Brown, Nolan J.
    Gendreau, Julian
    Singh, Rohin
    Shahrestani, Shane
    Boyett, Candler
    Diaz-Aguilar, Luis Daniel
    Pham, Martin H.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2023, 39 (04) : 443 - 451
  • [45] Accuracies of various types of spinal robot in robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion: a Bayesian network meta-analysis
    Xie, Lin-Zhen
    Wang, Qi-Long
    Zhang, Qi
    He, Da
    Tian, Wei
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [46] Robotic-Assisted Versus Fluoroscopic-Guided Surgery on the Accuracy of Spine Pedicle Screw Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Jung, Bongseok
    Han, Justin
    Shahsavarani, Shaya
    Abbas, Anas M.
    Echevarria, Alexandra C.
    Carrier, Robert E.
    Ngan, Alex
    Katz, Austen D.
    Essig, David
    Verma, Rohit
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [47] Image-guided pedicle screw insertion accuracy: a meta-analysis
    Nai-Feng Tian
    Hua-Zi Xu
    International Orthopaedics, 2009, 33 : 895 - 903
  • [48] Computer navigation versus fluoroscopy-guided navigation for thoracic pedicle screw placement: a meta-analysis
    Meng, Xiao-tong
    Guan, Xiao-fei
    Zhang, Hai-long
    He, Shi-sheng
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2016, 39 (03) : 385 - 391
  • [49] Percutaneous versus open pedicle screw instrumentation in treatment of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tian, Feng
    Tu, Lai-Yong
    Gu, Wen-Fei
    Zhang, En-Feng
    Wang, Zhen-Bin
    Chu, Ge
    Ka, Haer
    Zhao, Jiang
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (41)
  • [50] Percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation for treatment of thoracolumbar fractures: Systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies
    Phan, Kevin
    Rao, Prashanth J.
    Mobbs, Ralph J.
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 135 : 85 - 92